This is the stuff democrats are wasting time on. Meanwhile, we are still short 8million bottles worth of formula per day in this country,prices are sky high, and we are days away from finding out we have been in a recession this year.

But yea, gay marriage is what americans are worried about.

(07-22-2022 09:46 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  This is the stuff democrats are wasting time on. Meanwhile, we are still short 8million bottles worth of formula per day in this country,prices are sky high, and we are days away from finding out we have been in a recession this year.

But yea, gay marriage is what americans are worried about.

yep

and it aint gonna work

Desperation by the Dems

bwahahahahahaha, now they are trying to say that even with 2 quarters of negative gdp, that doesnt mean we are in a recession.


The July 28 Announcement Of Q2 GDP Will Not Mean Recession

Summary
The US economy has clearly slowed from its rapid 2021 growth and there are plenty of reasons to fear a recession some time in the next year or two. Even if reported GDP shows two negative quarters in the first half of 2022, the NBER committee is very unlikely to conclude that a recession started in the first quarter. We could have a situation on July 28 where the public and the markets, responding to media headlines, think they have been told that a US recession began in the first half of the year, only to be told the opposite two months later.


That is some #HoodWinkedTaintedTom level of spin right there.

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4525052...-recession

Good. First semi smart thing the Dems have done since the leak of the abortion ruling. They should also put forward a just simple abortion law codifying nationwide access in the cases of rape, incest, and health of the mother, but instead they'd rather hope for national stories regarding one of those issues to score political points. Make the GOP either have to codify these things or publicly vote against super majority positions of the American public.

(07-22-2022 08:50 AM)miko33 Wrote:  This is a common tactic that is employed by both parties. Draft a bill that on the surface is popular and/or obvious, put a poison pill or several attachments to the bill in order to force your opposition to vote "no" for a bill so that your side can claim whatever the goal you have. This was designed - intentionally - to get no votes on record for campaigning purposes...

Which part of that bill is the "poison pill"?

(07-22-2022 12:42 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  Good. First semi smart thing the Dems have done since the leak of the abortion ruling. They should also put forward a just simple abortion law codifying nationwide access in the cases of rape, incest, and health of the mother, but instead they'd rather hope for national stories regarding one of those issues to score political points. Make the GOP either have to codify these things or publicly vote against super majority positions of the American public.

you still miss the whole point.

we dont need the federal govt telling us who we can marry. period. for or against.

(07-22-2022 12:44 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(07-22-2022 12:42 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  Good. First semi smart thing the Dems have done since the leak of the abortion ruling. They should also put forward a just simple abortion law codifying nationwide access in the cases of rape, incest, and health of the mother, but instead they'd rather hope for national stories regarding one of those issues to score political points. Make the GOP either have to codify these things or publicly vote against super majority positions of the American public.

you still miss the whole point.

we dont need the federal govt telling us who we can marry. period. for or against.

But we need the state government telling us who we can marry?

(07-22-2022 12:48 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(07-22-2022 12:44 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(07-22-2022 12:42 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  Good. First semi smart thing the Dems have done since the leak of the abortion ruling. They should also put forward a just simple abortion law codifying nationwide access in the cases of rape, incest, and health of the mother, but instead they'd rather hope for national stories regarding one of those issues to score political points. Make the GOP either have to codify these things or publicly vote against super majority positions of the American public.

you still miss the whole point.

we dont need the federal govt telling us who we can marry. period. for or against.

But we need the state government telling us who we can marry?

No, the people of the state get to decide.

Take a freaking civics class for Gods sake.

(07-22-2022 12:48 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  

(07-22-2022 12:44 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(07-22-2022 12:42 PM)b0ndsj0ns Wrote:  Good. First semi smart thing the Dems have done since the leak of the abortion ruling. They should also put forward a just simple abortion law codifying nationwide access in the cases of rape, incest, and health of the mother, but instead they'd rather hope for national stories regarding one of those issues to score political points. Make the GOP either have to codify these things or publicly vote against super majority positions of the American public.

you still miss the whole point.

we dont need the federal govt telling us who we can marry. period. for or against.

But we need the state government telling us who we can marry?

That's called Federalism.

How would you like the GOP responding in 3 years by banning it on the federal level?