(03-25-2022 07:22 AM)Milwaukee Pilot Wrote: I'm going to venture a guess that NIU comes in a distant third this time, unless as the interview states, they end up with alternating sites as they did with the previous contract. For those who didn't hear the interview Craig Anderson indicated that the goal was a "permanent" site last contract but the Big Ten could not commit to keeping the U of I schedule open that weekend for an extended period of time.
I'm going to put a bet down that Illinois State gets it this go around. The IHSA is headquartered there and the school has made improvements. U of I has been their bread and butter for years, so I think we are third in the pecking order.
Yes, we are closer and most teams are north of I-80 but in reality both those other schools are very accessible for a one day turnaround, especially on that weekend.
The interesting takeaway was the very soon upcoming eight on eight football bracket and playoff, per Anderson, 16 teams within a year or so, probably ending on the weekend before. Didn't get into what size schools would field eight player teams.
Don't see the rationale behind your guess.
The IHSA being headquartered there has no bearing on whether an event is run successfully at that location or not. Their criteria starts with being a facility able to host and staff the event followed by ease of access to translate into good attendance. Highest possible attendance isn't even a criteria when you look at the 27 various IHSA championship events, a third of which are hosted by high schools.
No. 1, why should the Big Ten and Illinois handcuff their football scheduling by reserving their facility for the IHSA. That reason hasn't changed, if anything, the ILL-ness has the notion they need flexibility to possibly squeeze in a non-conference cupcake between the B1G finale and a B1G championship or bowl appearance. That may be crazy thinking to us but the ILL-ness are a smug and arrogant outfit.
No. 2, NIU being closer to the majority of qualifying teams coming from north of I-80 makes attendance easier and has been proven, higher for the larger classes. IHSA officials have not expressed any disappointment or displeasure with the championships contested at Huskie Stadium.
No. 3, regardless of improvements made at ISU, there is no Yordon Center and what makes you think the Redbirds are willing to give up hosting FCS playoff games? ISU has a greater chance of needing their field than the ILL-ness. Last but not least, why start over trying to master logistics of bringing teams and their fans in to place before and after their games in contrast to the ease and improvement shown with every visit to DeKalb?
No. 4, the 8-on-8 football pretty much excluding Chicago and the suburbs would be a more logical reason to host that at ISU or possibly EIU which has also proven itself for decades when it comes to boys and girls track and field. An 8-on-8 event would make the same kind of sense being geographically located for more schools.