epasnoopy
Diehard Huskie
Posts: 25,972
Joined: May 2005
Reputation: 106
I Root For: NIU Huskies
Location: Huskie Stadium
|
MAC Football returning production for 2022 season
https://www.espn.com/college-football/in...022-season
Quote:TEAM RET. PROD. OFF. (RK) DEF. (RK)
1. Bowling Green 92% 95% (1) 88% (4)
8. Northern Illinois. 83% 84% (15) 81% (16)
38. Toledo 73% 68% (60) 78% (29)
48. Ohio 70% 65% (64) 75% (36)
56. Akron 67% 53% (100) 81% (19)
60. E. Michigan 65% 66% (63) 65% (72)
61. C. Michigan 65% 73% (44) 58% (100)
81. Miami (Ohio) 62% 76% (34) 47% (120)
106. Buffalo 57% 51% (110) 63% (83)
117. Kent St 53% 44% (119) 62% (84)
124. W. Michigan 49% 27% (130) 70% (50)
127. Ball St. 42% 46% (118) 37% (127)
Non-conference opponents:
Quote:110. Tulsa 56% 57% (93) 55% (108)
63. Kentucky 65% 59% (86) 72% (43)
52. Vanderbilt 69% 70% (54) 67% (67)
(This post was last modified: 02-08-2022 05:46 PM by epasnoopy.)
|
|
02-08-2022 05:45 PM |
|
Schaefer Beer
1st String
Posts: 2,069
Joined: Feb 2020
Reputation: 36
I Root For: NIU
Location: Chicago area
|
RE: MAC Football returning production for 2022 season
(02-08-2022 05:45 PM)epasnoopy Wrote: https://www.espn.com/college-football/in...022-season
Quote:TEAM RET. PROD. OFF. (RK) DEF. (RK)
1. Bowling Green 92% 95% (1) 88% (4)
8. Northern Illinois. 83% 84% (15) 81% (16)
38. Toledo 73% 68% (60) 78% (29)
48. Ohio 70% 65% (64) 75% (36)
56. Akron 67% 53% (100) 81% (19)
60. E. Michigan 65% 66% (63) 65% (72)
61. C. Michigan 65% 73% (44) 58% (100)
81. Miami (Ohio) 62% 76% (34) 47% (120)
106. Buffalo 57% 51% (110) 63% (83)
117. Kent St 53% 44% (119) 62% (84)
124. W. Michigan 49% 27% (130) 70% (50)
127. Ball St. 42% 46% (118) 37% (127)
Non-conference opponents:
Quote:110. Tulsa 56% 57% (93) 55% (108)
63. Kentucky 65% 59% (86) 72% (43)
52. Vanderbilt 69% 70% (54) 67% (67)
EPA, is this the percentage of your starters returning and the rank of the percentage of your offense coming back?
If this is not right, can you explain it a little since it is an ESPN + paywall.
(This post was last modified: 02-08-2022 06:18 PM by Schaefer Beer.)
|
|
02-08-2022 06:17 PM |
|
epasnoopy
Diehard Huskie
Posts: 25,972
Joined: May 2005
Reputation: 106
I Root For: NIU Huskies
Location: Huskie Stadium
|
RE: MAC Football returning production for 2022 season
(02-08-2022 06:17 PM)Schaefer Beer Wrote: EPA, is this the percentage of your starters returning and the rank of the percentage of your offense coming back?
Offense:
Quote:Percent of returning WR/TE receiving yards: 37% of the overall number
Percent of returning QB passing yards: 29%
Percent of returning OL snaps: 28%
Percent of returning RB rushing yards: 6%
Broken out by position/player, you're looking at approximately 29% for the quarterback, 9% for each of four wide receivers and/or tight ends and 6% for the running back and each offensive lineman.
Defense:
Quote:Percent of returning tackles: 59%
Percent of returning passes defensed: 28%
Percent of returning tackles for loss: 8%
Percent of returning sacks: 5%
|
|
02-08-2022 06:21 PM |
|
Schaefer Beer
1st String
Posts: 2,069
Joined: Feb 2020
Reputation: 36
I Root For: NIU
Location: Chicago area
|
RE: MAC Football returning production for 2022 season
(02-08-2022 06:21 PM)epasnoopy Wrote: (02-08-2022 06:17 PM)Schaefer Beer Wrote: EPA, is this the percentage of your starters returning and the rank of the percentage of your offense coming back?
Offense:
Quote:Percent of returning WR/TE receiving yards: 37% of the overall number
Percent of returning QB passing yards: 29%
Percent of returning OL snaps: 28%
Percent of returning RB rushing yards: 6%
Broken out by position/player, you're looking at approximately 29% for the quarterback, 9% for each of four wide receivers and/or tight ends and 6% for the running back and each offensive lineman.
Defense:
Quote:Percent of returning tackles: 59%
Percent of returning passes defensed: 28%
Percent of returning tackles for loss: 8%
Percent of returning sacks: 5%
Got it, thank you!
|
|
02-08-2022 06:51 PM |
|