Cue commie Tom


Not a shread of evidence

Reeeeeeeee

(01-21-2022 07:39 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  

(01-21-2022 01:08 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  Voter GA Confirms Over 100,000 Ballots in Georgia 2020 Election Missing Valid Chain of Custody Documentation, Additionally Drop Box Videos Have Been Destroyed

Quote:Today Voter GA provided evidence that 100,000 ballots lack the proper chain of custody documentation in Georgia which is required by law. Voter GA also reported that the video coverage of the ballot drop boxes inserted into the 2020 Election has either been deleted or is of such poor quality that they would never be able to be used to determine the content of nighttime drop-offs.

Before we all get into a tizzy here ..... they must know which those 100K ballots those are? Who did all those ballots vote for?

While I ‘m sure they can’t verify who those ballots voted for individually, I’m betting they know which precincts they came from and the vote totals from those precincts.

Who wants to bet that the majority come from those Democrat run shitholes That always seem to have issues in every election………often enough that the coincidences don’t wash.

Places like Fulton county or Broward Co. in Florida have histories of somehow being unable to run an election without shenanigans happening almost every time.

……..not a coincidence.

(01-21-2022 11:17 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(01-21-2022 09:55 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(01-21-2022 09:05 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  But the evidence we've seen -- elections commission &/or courts from multiple states making illegal decisions to conduct the 2020 election with drop boxes and mail-in ballots; vote counting suspended late night only to find massive swings from Trump to Biden; election workers being denied lawful & required access to monitor the counting process; dozens/hundreds of affidavits from election workers telling under penalties of perjury of irregularities they witnessed; video evidence of people illegally stuffing drop boxes with multiple ballots; self-confession of ballot harvesting and drop box stuffing person who received over $40,000 in payment; election commissions refusing to comply with lawful subpoenas; the list goes on.

But that confirms my point. When these things come to light after the election, there really isn't much that can be done. We need to have detection and prevention controls in place and operating effectively before and during the election. And that is what we did not have in 2020.

There may not be anything that can be done. But then again, that which can be done can't be done with a snap of the fingers. It takes dedicated effort, fights, and time.

And, yes, many times that fight is against people in your own party.

For example, based on WI and GA evidence TODAY, those states could decertify. But getting that done will take more fights i.e. legal action and law suits.

Twenty-six electoral votes (10 WI + 16 GA) won't change the outcome,

2020 Results
306 Biden
232 Trump
270 to Win

2020 with WI, GA Decertification
280 Biden
232 Trump
270 to Win

There is still an effort in AZ. While neither the governor nor the SOS have been willing to act on the evidence, that could change with the 2022 election. The GOP candidate for governor and two of the GOP primary SOS have vowed they will decertify.

Two of the four GOP candidates, Shawnna Bolick and Mark Finchem, have publicly stated they support efforts to decertify the 2020 AZ presidential election. Finchem currently serves in the AZ House for district 11 and took the lead in organizing the election hearings shortly after the 2020 results were announced. He is also associated with the Oath Keepers. Bolick serves in the AZ House, district 20.

One candidate, Michelle Ugenti-Rita, who is currently an AZ state senator has opposed election changes. Because of this she was booed offstage at a Trump rally last July. I don't know the position of the other candidate.

If AZ were to decertify its 11 electoral votes we then would run into a problem with the 2020 presidential electoral college results.

2020 with WI, GA, AZ Decertification
269 Biden
232 Trump
270 to Win

What would the courts do if these three states decertified? Would they even have a say? What would trigger the House to act?

It seems there's a process to address the lack of 270 votes prior to inauguration day, but what about after?

Quote:National Archives - Electoral College - FAQ

What happens if no presidential candidate gets 270 electoral votes?

If no candidate receives a majority of electoral votes, the Presidential election leaves the Electoral College process and moves to Congress.

The House of Representatives elects the President from the 3 Presidential candidates who received the most electoral votes. Each State delegation has one vote and it is up to the individual States to determine how to vote. (Since the District of Columbia is not a State, it has no State delegation in the House and cannot vote). A candidate must receive at least 26 votes (a majority of the States) to be elected.

The Senate elects the Vice President from the 2 Vice Presidential candidates with the most electoral votes. Each Senator casts one vote for Vice President. (Since the District of Columbia is has no Senators and is not represented in the vote). A candidate must receive at least 51 votes (a majority of Senators) to be elected.

If the House of Representatives fails to elect a President by Inauguration Day, the Vice-President Elect serves as acting President until the deadlock is resolved in the House.

Would states be required to eliminate invalid ballots (if possible) and perform a count of valid ballots?

These possible results don't include PA with 20 electoral votes and what might happen there.

Decertification after the inauguration is meaningless it’s just like virtue signaling