(08-13-2021 12:34 PM)b2b Wrote: So the left is relentlessly attacking this guy who is essentially harmless. Yet they completely ignore the CLEAR cognitive decline of a sitting President. What gives? Why the hell do you care about Mike Lindell so much?
Harmless millionaires spamming conspiracy theories carrying real life public health implications with giant media megaphones aren’t harmless.
It gives credence to Qanon supporters like Bartlett to continue spamming their propaganda.
I like how you completely whiffed on the other part of the post. Own it already. You've got us dead to rights on Mike Lindell.
(08-13-2021 12:34 PM)b2b Wrote: So the left is relentlessly attacking this guy who is essentially harmless. Yet they completely ignore the CLEAR cognitive decline of a sitting President. What gives? Why the hell do you care about Mike Lindell so much?
Harmless millionaires spamming conspiracy theories carrying real life public health implications with giant media megaphones aren’t harmless.
It gives credence to Qanon supporters like Bartlett to continue spamming their propaganda.
Which leftist actors do constantly. Just seems harmful when someone on the right does what the lefts been doing for years. The hypocrisy is amazing.
Call them out then. No ones stopping you. Can’t spell bipartisan without bias
(08-13-2021 09:49 AM)BobcatEngineer Wrote: Isn't today the day that Lindell and the QAnon folks claimed Trump would be reinstated? Let's see how that plays out for them.
Which means maybe the left should finally QUIT trying to attach QAnon as some serious source of data.
I don't know anyone on the right that gives QAnon the time of day. In fact the only people i've seen push Qanon as a serious source are the news networks, and they only do it because "it makes right-leaning folks look bad if we pretend everyone on the right gives them serious consideration".
Someone on this thread literally quoted CodeMonkeyZ, who was one of the guys posting as QAnon on 4chan, 8 chan, and on and on. But yeah - no one bought into that around here. You bet.
You might be talking about me. I quoted CodemonkeyZ because he knows the internal workings of a computer system and from what I can see he knows what he's talking about. But you, like the Left will attack anyone's character when you don't like the message. As far as Q, what ever, I've heard about them but know nothing about them. Also can you tell me where you got your information about him posting as Qanon? From what I've heard he said this was false.
I'm not aware of ANYONE here chastising Lindell for creating a successful business. What he overcame and achieved was remarkable.
None of that means he is not available for criticism and lambasting for all his election nonsense. In that, yes, he's a complete loon. And this week forever cemented that.
(08-13-2021 12:34 PM)b2b Wrote: So the left is relentlessly attacking this guy who is essentially harmless. Yet they completely ignore the CLEAR cognitive decline of a sitting President. What gives? Why the hell do you care about Mike Lindell so much?
Harmless millionaires spamming conspiracy theories carrying real life public health implications with giant media megaphones aren’t harmless.
It gives credence to Qanon supporters like Bartlett to continue spamming their propaganda.
Which leftist actors do constantly. Just seems harmful when someone on the right does what the lefts been doing for years. The hypocrisy is amazing.
Call them out then. No ones stopping you. Can’t spell bipartisan without bias
They don't bother me but I am not as easily swayed as you seem to be. Just pointing out your hypocrisy.
(08-13-2021 09:49 AM)BobcatEngineer Wrote: Isn't today the day that Lindell and the QAnon folks claimed Trump would be reinstated? Let's see how that plays out for them.
Which means maybe the left should finally QUIT trying to attach QAnon as some serious source of data.
I don't know anyone on the right that gives QAnon the time of day. In fact the only people i've seen push Qanon as a serious source are the news networks, and they only do it because "it makes right-leaning folks look bad if we pretend everyone on the right gives them serious consideration".
Someone on this thread literally quoted CodeMonkeyZ, who was one of the guys posting as QAnon on 4chan, 8 chan, and on and on. But yeah - no one bought into that around here. You bet.
You might be talking about me. I quoted CodemonkeyZ because he knows the internal workings of a computer system and from what I can see he knows what he's talking about. But you, like the Left will attack anyone's character when you don't like the message. As far as Q, what ever, I've heard about them but know nothing about them. Also can you tell me where you got your information about him posting as Qanon? From what I've heard he said this was false.
But let me guess: "Librul media. Fake news. Can't believe anyone watched that doc."
Whether or not he absolutely is the "Q" person (or one of the people who posted under that moniker), he is involved in promoting the qanon narrative of lies that has allowed morons like Lindell to keep right-wingers hanging on for an ounce of hope that the BS that they banked on for months will come to fruition.
(This post was last modified: 08-13-2021 02:57 PM by tigergreen.)
(08-13-2021 10:47 AM)DaSaintFan Wrote: Which means maybe the left should finally QUIT trying to attach QAnon as some serious source of data.
I don't know anyone on the right that gives QAnon the time of day. In fact the only people i've seen push Qanon as a serious source are the news networks, and they only do it because "it makes right-leaning folks look bad if we pretend everyone on the right gives them serious consideration".
Someone on this thread literally quoted CodeMonkeyZ, who was one of the guys posting as QAnon on 4chan, 8 chan, and on and on. But yeah - no one bought into that around here. You bet.
You might be talking about me. I quoted CodemonkeyZ because he knows the internal workings of a computer system and from what I can see he knows what he's talking about. But you, like the Left will attack anyone's character when you don't like the message. As far as Q, what ever, I've heard about them but know nothing about them. Also can you tell me where you got your information about him posting as Qanon? From what I've heard he said this was false.
But let me guess: "Librul media. Fake news. Can't believe anyone watched that doc."
Whether or not he absolutely is the "Q" person (or one of the people who posted under that moniker), he is involved in promoting the qanon narrative of lies that has allowed morons like Lindell to keep right-wingers hanging on for an ounce of hope that the BS that they banked on for months will come to fruition.
Thanks for the Links but just as I suspected, you have no facts. This is from the Links you posted.
Ron Watkins seems to admit he's Q, in the dumbest possible ending to QAnon.
Seems *** give the impression or sensation of being something or having a particular quality.
Ron Watkins, the founder of 8chan who is one of several people suspected of being the anonymous poster “Q”
Suspected*** have an idea or impression of the existence, presence, or truth of (something) without certain proof.
That first Link, I have no idea what that's about. Thanks for playing.
(This post was last modified: 08-13-2021 06:23 PM by Redbanksdog.)
(08-13-2021 12:34 PM)b2b Wrote: So the left is relentlessly attacking this guy who is essentially harmless. Yet they completely ignore the CLEAR cognitive decline of a sitting President. What gives? Why the hell do you care about Mike Lindell so much?
Harmless millionaires spamming conspiracy theories carrying real life public health implications with giant media megaphones aren’t harmless.
It gives credence to Qanon supporters like Bartlett to continue spamming their propaganda.
I like how you completely whiffed on the other part of the post. Own it already. You've got us dead to rights on Mike Lindell.
I think the painting of Biden as a demented Alz addled walking zombie to be partisan in nature. I thought the same when people called DJT demented and syph brained.
I think Biden is a 78 year old and high functioning given that but why tf are we electing 78 year olds for POTUS? Def bothers me. FTR. Also, I never read the 2nd half of the post.
(This post was last modified: 08-13-2021 04:04 PM by JDTulane.)
(08-13-2021 12:34 PM)b2b Wrote: So the left is relentlessly attacking this guy who is essentially harmless. Yet they completely ignore the CLEAR cognitive decline of a sitting President. What gives? Why the hell do you care about Mike Lindell so much?
Harmless millionaires spamming conspiracy theories carrying real life public health implications with giant media megaphones aren’t harmless.
It gives credence to Qanon supporters like Bartlett to continue spamming their propaganda.
I like how you completely whiffed on the other part of the post. Own it already. You've got us dead to rights on Mike Lindell.
I think the painting of Biden as a demented Alz addled walking zombie to be partisan in nature. I thought the same when people called DJT demented and syph brained.
I think Biden is a 78 year old and high functioning given that but why tf are we electing 78 year olds for POTUS? Def bothers me. FTR. Also, I never read the 2nd half of the post.
My man.... there is absolutely no way you can watch Biden in even a limited capacity and call him "high capacity"
I’ve asked the idiot Tulane before to quote a post of mine showing me to be a “qanon supporter”. He can’t because the closest thing to that would be where I said “I didn’t even know what qanon was till a few months ago”.
He’s learned his lessons from his masters well. Pick a lie, repeat it over and over and over hoping it sticks. You are truely a lapdog pos Tulane. Congrats.
(08-14-2021 09:02 AM)Mav Wrote: I for one am shocked that a pillow merchant and the 8chan guy came up empty when asked to present election fraud. Truly stunned.
It’s as if being a millionaire pillow expert with a drug problem (allegedly )does NOT make you an expert on election fraud not election security.
/
Mike Lindell's Cyber Symposium is Live
![[Image: E8vw-giWQAAS6OO?format=jpg&name=900x900]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E8vw-giWQAAS6OO?format=jpg&name=900x900)
![[Image: d9d2734d4fc1c50a81c58e22c000d677cf-18-gr...e.w700.jpg]](https://pyxis.nymag.com/v1/imgs/eb8/ea4/d9d2734d4fc1c50a81c58e22c000d677cf-18-great-pumpkin-charlie-brown.2x.rsquare.w700.jpg)