Quote:Controversial and compromised Congressman Eric Swalwell presented evidence in the impeachment “trial” of President Trump that was clearly and provably modified on Wednesday. A tweet presented by Swalwell from the verified Twitter account @JenLawrence21 retweeted by President Trump on January 3rd. The only problem is that Jennifer Lawrence, (the awesome one; one not the actress) doesn’t have a verified Twitter account and never has. I can vouch, she is my Fiancee.

The modification might seem like a small error but it’s not. Considering the motive and that it was presented by someone who has been recently exposed as being compromised by a sexual relationship with a CCP intelligence agent.

It’s been a rough time for Swalwell. After a disastrous run for President that failed to materialize whose most memorable moment was Swalwell’s massive fart in a media interview. It didn’t get better when it was revealed that he had been sleeping with a CCP intelligence agent compromising national security. Despite these humiliations, Swalwell was selected as one of the House impeachment managers.

Swalwell shouldn’t be presenting evidence on anything, he has no credibility and his motives are suspect. That he so clearly presented altered evidence to the United States Senate sure seems like perjury. At least it would be if any of us did what Swalwell did to Jen.

Similarly altered video montages have been used regularly by the Democrats prosecuting the case. These montages splice together thousands of hours of video to make it seem like events that happened often weeks and months apart actually happened together. It’s what they have always falsely accused James O’Keefe and Project Veritas of doing with their legendary undercover videos.

WHERE ARE THE WITNESSES?
The media is calling for me to testify in the impeachment trial including the Washington Post and IJR. Based on what I’ve seen about the legitimacy of this ridiculous “trial” but I don’t expect that to happen. The Senate doesn’t want the truth to get in the way of their divisive story.

Link

(02-10-2021 08:03 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

Quote:Controversial and compromised Congressman Eric Swalwell presented evidence in the impeachment “trial” of President Trump that was clearly and provably modified on Wednesday. A tweet presented by Swalwell from the verified Twitter account @JenLawrence21 retweeted by President Trump on January 3rd. The only problem is that Jennifer Lawrence, (the awesome one; one not the actress) doesn’t have a verified Twitter account and never has. I can vouch, she is my Fiancee.

The modification might seem like a small error but it’s not. Considering the motive and that it was presented by someone who has been recently exposed as being compromised by a sexual relationship with a CCP intelligence agent.

It’s been a rough time for Swalwell. After a disastrous run for President that failed to materialize whose most memorable moment was Swalwell’s massive fart in a media interview. It didn’t get better when it was revealed that he had been sleeping with a CCP intelligence agent compromising national security. Despite these humiliations, Swalwell was selected as one of the House impeachment managers.

Swalwell shouldn’t be presenting evidence on anything, he has no credibility and his motives are suspect. That he so clearly presented altered evidence to the United States Senate sure seems like perjury. At least it would be if any of us did what Swalwell did to Jen.

Similarly altered video montages have been used regularly by the Democrats prosecuting the case. These montages splice together thousands of hours of video to make it seem like events that happened often weeks and months apart actually happened together. It’s what they have always falsely accused James O’Keefe and Project Veritas of doing with their legendary undercover videos.

WHERE ARE THE WITNESSES?
The media is calling for me to testify in the impeachment trial including the Washington Post and IJR. Based on what I’ve seen about the legitimacy of this ridiculous “trial” but I don’t expect that to happen. The Senate doesn’t want the truth to get in the way of their divisive story.

Link

I was looking at some of the videos the news (don't remember if it was ABC or NBC) was playing and thinking, there's no way some of that stuff would get admitted in a court of law. It was irrelevant and inflammatory.

Edited videos as the article describes are clearly unacceptable.