RE: Details on that "other conference"'s new media deal
The blue bloods rule their conferences and intermittent conference championships by "football" first schools is not a sign of doom for these programs. Is there more parity? Yes. Does it mean these programs have something to fear? Don't think so. Let's give FSU the 2020 championship. ND won in 2015, Miami in 2013, FSU in 2012. You have to go back to 2004 (Maryland) where a champion wasn't won by UNC, Duke and UVa (2018, 2014). 95 and 96 Wake and 93 by GaTech.
SEC Tourney Champ: 2019 Auburn, 2015-2018 UK, 2014 UF, 2013 Ole Miss, 2012 Vandy, 2011-2012 UK, 2009 MissSt, 2008 UGa, 2005 - 2007 UF, 2003-2004 UK, 2002 Miss St, 2001 UK, 2000 Ark, 97-98 UK, 96 Miss St, 92-95 UK, 91 Bama.
Big 12 Tourney Champ: 2019 ISU, 2018 KU, 2017 ISU, 2016 KU, 2014-2015 ISU, 2013 KU, 2012 Mizzou, 2010-2011 KU,
2009 Mizzou, 2006-2008 KU, 2004-2005 OSU, 2001-2003 OU, 2000 ISU, 97-99 KU
Pac Tourney Champ: 2019 Ore, 2018-2019 Zona, 2016 Ore, 2015 Zona, 2014 UCLA, 2013 Ore, 2012 Colo, 2010-2011 UW, 2009 USC, 2008 UCLA, 2007 Ore, 2006 UCLA, 2005 UW, 2004 Stanford, 2003 Ore, 88-90 Zona, 87 UCLA
Big Tourney Champ: 2019 MSU, 2017-2018 UM, 2016 MSU, 2015 Wis, 2014 MSU, 2013 OSU, 2012 MSU, 2010-2011 OSU, 2009 PU, 2008 Wis, 2007 OSU, 2006 Iowa, 2005 Ill, 2004 Wis, 2003 Ill, 2002 OSU, 2001 Iowa, 1999 - 2000 MSU, 1998 UM
Not really seeing a trend where "football first" schools are challenging for conference and national championships versus the elites of each conference. I guess a case can be made for Oregon versus Zona and UCLA. The Big is the exception. The SEC, aside from UF, UK has dominated the majority of the time and the championship still runs through them. KU rules over Big 12 bball. UNC and Duke for the ACC. Maybe I am not seeing what you are seeing.
|