If verifiable, this is an absolute game changer.

I saw that. One problem is apparently the states print the ballots, outsourced to printing companies.

This is far right even for Alex Jones. It's over just have to fight for senate control.

SMH.

This guy doesn't have a good track record so I would not put any faith in what he is saying that there was some deep state OP going on.

It is possible to plant a tiny tracking code during or after the printing on any paper ballot. It can be as small as a pixel or two.

For watermarking in the paper on the paper ballot, all paper would have to be source from the Feds as watermarking is part of the papermaking process. A true watermark is actually IN the paper. Since each state prints their own ballots I doubt all paper is sourced from the feds or government approved sources.

If it was a printed watermark placed by the feds then all ballots would have to be printed by government
printers or government approved print sources. Since each state prints their own ballots I doubt all printing is sourced from the feds or government approved sources.

If there is any truth to this the only way this appears possible would be for the feds to have created coded ballots that exactly match the state ballots and then seed them into certain areas of the country to catch areas they thought might cheat and then catch then as counted ballots on the back end.

Is what the guy says possible...i guess it could be as outlined above but again the guy lack any credibility.

AND if the was a deep state op to do this...why would this guy be out talking about it?

So the claim is all 50 states had to use DHS supplied paper to print ballots and the paper has a watermark or code? That doesn't stop corrupt state or county employees printing up pallets of ballots and mailing them or taking them where to they want to fill them out then submit them. There is a TikTok video out there of a guy filling out 7 ballots for Joe, and he didn't check any boxes down ballot for Congress/Senate...came out in mid October. All you need is corrupt poll counters you know the people who have the registration books.

Well, I guess the point is that any ballot printed on non supplied paper would be an indication of a fraudulent ballot.

State elections are state elections and should be handled however the states want. Federal elections should have federally designed safeguards for trust and transparency.

for any of what that guy said to possibly be true the feds have some control over the states in a federal election.

the only other way this could work would be if there were coded fake ballots with fake names dropped into the mail to see if they were returned and/or counted. they would look identical to the state's ballots but carry an identifier.

But again...the guy in the video lacks credibility and if there was an OP going on this guy would not be out talking about it. Loose lips sink ships.

It was over as soon as SCOTUS ruled ballot counting could go on for weeks. It was a done deal.

(11-06-2020 12:07 PM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  This guy doesn't have a good track record so I would not put any faith in what he is saying that there was some deep state OP going on.

It is possible to plant a tiny tracking code during or after the printing on any paper ballot. It can be as small as a pixel or two.

For watermarking in the paper on the paper ballot, all paper would have to be source from the Feds as watermarking is part of the papermaking process. A true watermark is actually IN the paper. Since each state prints their own ballots I doubt all paper is sourced from the feds or government approved sources.

If it was a printed watermark placed by the feds then all ballots would have to be printed by government
printers or government approved print sources. Since each state prints their own ballots I doubt all printing is sourced from the feds or government approved sources.

If there is any truth to this the only way this appears possible would be for the feds to have created coded ballots that exactly match the state ballots and then seed them into certain areas of the country to catch areas they thought might cheat and then catch then as counted ballots on the back end.

Is what the guy says possible...i guess it could be as outlined above but again the guy lack any credibility.

AND if the was a deep state op to do this...why would this guy be out talking about it?

I was sent a link to a guy claiming this watermark stuff and some of the questions you raised came to mind. Then, I discovered that this was from Qanon. I smelled B.S. immediately. Just another Q drop that is totally false. Anybody who believes in anything coming from Q is an idiot. But there are people that are so fed up they will believe anything that gives them hope that this election fraud will be exposed.

I'm from Missouri...street, I'll believe it when I see it. But, for now I think this guy is full of Schiff.

!SHOW ME AND STOP SCREWING AROUND!...then I'll believe it.

Still seeing some people writing about this.

Quote:President Trump has a great case and will win this election based on the Constitution per retired Intel Operative Tony Shaffer.

Tony Shaffer is a retired Intelligence Operative and current President of the London Center for Policy Research and a member of President Trump’s 2020 Advisory Board. He believes the President won the election and has a great case in the courts to prove it.

Shaffer created a fire on Twitter yesterday when he questioned whether the President may have marked all the ballots in this year’s election which would indicate if a ballot counted was legitimate or not.

Shaffer tweeted this:

A hypothetical question for all the Democrat trolls following my feed…
What if DHS anticipated DNC counting fraud.
What if they “tagged” each legitimate ballot.
What would happen if DHS does an audit of all counted ballots and find ballots without the tag – what happens then?

One tweeter asked, "Isn't ballot production done locally?"

Quote:Next Shaffer made some comments and asked another question:

It’s done in known contracted sights…you do understand law enforcement asks for cooperation all the time from companies, right?

A third tweet from Shaffer indicated that there are numerous ways to mark documents without the markings clearly identifiable:

(One tweeter said Watermarks - My comment)

Oh, there is more than that now...
People don't understand how light works...and what they don't see can be seen in infrared and ultraviolet...we had a whole block of instruction at "the Farm" on secret writing...it is amazing...

This caused an uproar on Twitter and liberals freaked out thinking they might have gotten caught in their attempt to steal this year’s election.

Shaffer has a credible record and one of the first to confirm that President Trump was being spied on back in March 2017. We covered this in prior posts

Despite this, I'm still very skeptical of this story but hope and pray it is true.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11...y-shaffer/

We can't even get the states to agree that every voter needs to show a valid ID to vote...

(11-06-2020 06:19 PM)TexanMark Wrote:  We can't even get the states to agree that every voter needs to show a valid ID to vote...

I agree about the crazy varying standards between the States.

But I think the gist of what is in both the video and gateway pundit story is that the States would not the marking was being done.

But until proof is produced it's just theories.