(10-29-2019 04:51 PM)goliath74 Wrote: These rankings are totally unbiased, yet absolutely not based in logic:
Code:
# Team 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1. UAB 44 82 62 7 8 11 214 35.67
2. LaTech 22 52 22 102 46 46 290 48.33
3. WKU 59 119 108 18 28 17 349 58.17
4. FAU 26 100 40 94 58 57 375 62.50
5. Marshall 82 26 81 103 38 56 386 64.33
6. USM 10 116 65 104 21 76 392 65.33
7. FIU 100 39 70 8 118 59 394 65.67
8. UNT 19 74 40 91 96 109 429 71.50
9. Charlotte 91 28 49 63 106 128 465 77.50
10.UTSA 122 50 116 19 116 100 523 87.17
11.MTSU 70 51 90 111 112 93 527 87.83
12.ODU 121 124 128 65 37 82 557 92.83
13.Rice 115 121 124 83 59 81 583 97.17
14.UTEP 117 99 119 82 90 115 622 103.67
1 = Pass Offense, 2 = Run Offense, 3 = Scoring Offense,
4 = Pass Defense, 5 = Run Defense, 6 = Scoring Defense,
7 = Rating Points, 8 = Ratings.
Three pretty clear tiers.
Some CUSA-Power Rankings, including in-state schools and non-UTA OOC,
AVERAGE of USA Today (Paul Myerberg), SP+ (Bill Connelly), and Massey Composite (parenthesis has them in order).
Increase or decrease in CUSA standing shown by +/- (In/De in composite ranking in parentheses); # indicates no change
FYI (Massey Composite Includes ESPN's FPI, but not Paul Myerberg or Bill Connelly's)
Tier 1
1. Tech (36, 54, 82) 57.33 # (+0.67)
2. UAB (43, 75, 71) 63 # (-2.67)
3. FAU (70, 67, 55) 64 +1 (+10)
4. Marshall (62, 90, 60) 72.67 +2 (+10)
5. SoMiss (64, 89, 76) 75.33 # (+3)
6. WKU (69, 87, 77) 77.67 -3 (-6)
Tier 2
7. UNT (100, 92, 111) 101 # (-11.33)
8. FIU (102, 96, 108) 102 # (-10.33)
9. MTSU (106, 107, 99) 104 # (+10.33)
10. UNCC (104, 110, 115) 109.67 # (+5)
Tier 3
11. UTSA (118, 126, 120) 121.33 # (-1)
12a. Rice (125, 123, 124) 124 +1 (-1)
12b. ODU (122, 124, 126) 124 # (-1.67)
14. UTEP (126, 129, 128) 127.67 # (#)
https://www.espn.com/college-football/st...te-alabama
https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nc...478357001/
https://www.masseyratings.com/cf/compare.htm
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
*** Power Rankings - Week 9 *** 
