(10-23-2019 12:55 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 12:52 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 12:48 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  Holy ****, just saw the pics that were posted. Woah. It's creepier than I imagined it in my head. College chic fully clothed looking on her phone ... Congresswoman butt naked brushing her hair like a mother would brush her daughter's hair.

How do you know that's a college chic?

College-aged.

There's no debating from anybody the staffer in question pictured is 22. Currently. Still young enough to be on mommy and daddy's health insurance. Very much college-aged.

The congresswoman says it's not the staffer in the photo though.

(10-23-2019 08:59 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-22-2019 04:53 PM)q5sys Wrote:  

(10-22-2019 03:17 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Hill is fighting back. Claims this is a smear attempt by her husband who she is currently divorcing and also political opponents. I guess she's saying the girl in the photo is not the staffer.

That doesn't invalidate that she used her position of power as employer over a young female staffer her own sexual pleasure.

Nor does it validate it. She's claiming she did nothing inappropriate with a staffer. Prove it, and I'll cheerfully call for her resignation. Until then, we still presume innocence in America, right?

Well, some of us do...

Correction, she did run as openly bisexual, though her sexuality has been diligently left out of her Wikipedia profile and other places you'd think it would be prominent given the vox populi.

Regardless .... not a good look. Irresponsible. The sort of behavior that gets you leveraged and turned into a puppet in DC. I looked up who she's running against .... sheesh ... she's running against the California GOP's equivalent of Bob Jones ... a person that has made banning gay marriage their entire political career. Well that explains how Katie Hill entered the public political sphere quite nicely. A shame they can't both lose that contest. Sounds like voters in that district get to choose between Rick Santorum and this mess.

(10-23-2019 01:01 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 12:55 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 12:52 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 12:48 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  Holy ****, just saw the pics that were posted. Woah. It's creepier than I imagined it in my head. College chic fully clothed looking on her phone ... Congresswoman butt naked brushing her hair like a mother would brush her daughter's hair.

How do you know that's a college chic?

College-aged.

There's no debating from anybody the staffer in question pictured is 22. Currently. Still young enough to be on mommy and daddy's health insurance. Very much college-aged.

The congresswoman says it's not the staffer in the photo though.

I agree. But that means its even creepier.

The staffer she is kissing does not appear to be the same person shes with when she's butt naked. Its another young girl altogether.

Which means its even more rampant than we were led to believe.

(10-23-2019 01:01 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  The congresswoman says it's not the staffer in the photo though.

She also says her ex-husband is in a grand conspiracy to bring her down. It's on Politico right now. And Bill also said he did not have sexual relations with that woman.

(10-23-2019 01:06 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:01 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  The congresswoman says it's not the staffer in the photo though.

She also says her ex-husband is in a grand conspiracy to bring her down. It's on Politico right now. And Bill also said he did not have sexual relations with that woman.

Of course she could be lying, but we at least need to wait to see some real evidence before running her out of town, especially since the only sources for this are dubious at best.

(10-23-2019 01:05 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:01 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 12:55 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 12:52 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 12:48 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  Holy ****, just saw the pics that were posted. Woah. It's creepier than I imagined it in my head. College chic fully clothed looking on her phone ... Congresswoman butt naked brushing her hair like a mother would brush her daughter's hair.

How do you know that's a college chic?

College-aged.

There's no debating from anybody the staffer in question pictured is 22. Currently. Still young enough to be on mommy and daddy's health insurance. Very much college-aged.

The congresswoman says it's not the staffer in the photo though.

I agree. But that means its even creepier.

The staffer she is kissing does not appear to be the same person shes with when she's butt naked. Its another young girl altogether.

Which means its even more rampant than we were led to believe.

The disturbing part is that apparently morals and ethics only matter for everyone who is not a Democratic women or a homosexual Democratic male (see Barney Frank). Let any male in Congress pull this stunt with leaked photos of him sitting naked grooming a younger woman with rumors of sexual encounters with staffers and it would be all over for their term in Congress.

Let a left coast liberal wench pull the stunt and we are urged to look away instead of applying appropriate reciprocity.

(10-23-2019 01:11 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:05 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:01 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 12:55 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 12:52 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  How do you know that's a college chic?

College-aged.

There's no debating from anybody the staffer in question pictured is 22. Currently. Still young enough to be on mommy and daddy's health insurance. Very much college-aged.

The congresswoman says it's not the staffer in the photo though.

I agree. But that means its even creepier.

The staffer she is kissing does not appear to be the same person shes with when she's butt naked. Its another young girl altogether.

Which means its even more rampant than we were led to believe.

The disturbing part is that apparently morals and ethics only matter for everyone who is not Democrat women and homosexual Democratic males (see Barney Frank). Let any male in Congress pull this stunt with leaked photos of him sitting naked grooming a younger woman with rumors of sexual encounters with staffers and it would be all over for their term in Congress.

Let a left coast liberal wench pull the stunt and we are urged to look away instead of applying appropriate reciprocity.

A G A I N, we don't know for a fact yet that these reports are true!

Can't we just wait until the investigation is done before jumping on our collective soap boxes?

That wasn't Governor Blackface in the photo on his yearbook page either.

That seems to have worked for him.

(10-23-2019 01:13 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:11 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:05 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:01 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 12:55 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  College-aged.

There's no debating from anybody the staffer in question pictured is 22. Currently. Still young enough to be on mommy and daddy's health insurance. Very much college-aged.

The congresswoman says it's not the staffer in the photo though.

I agree. But that means its even creepier.

The staffer she is kissing does not appear to be the same person shes with when she's butt naked. Its another young girl altogether.

Which means its even more rampant than we were led to believe.

The disturbing part is that apparently morals and ethics only matter for everyone who is not Democrat women and homosexual Democratic males (see Barney Frank). Let any male in Congress pull this stunt with leaked photos of him sitting naked grooming a younger woman with rumors of sexual encounters with staffers and it would be all over for their term in Congress.

Let a left coast liberal wench pull the stunt and we are urged to look away instead of applying appropriate reciprocity.

A G A I N, we don't know for a fact yet that these reports are true!

Can't we just wait until the investigation is done before jumping on our collective soap boxes?

Really? We have the f'ing photos. We can see that it happened.

Katie Hill DID NOT DENY the affair and relationship with the intern. She spoke Clintonese. She denied an IMPROPER relationship.

(10-23-2019 01:13 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:11 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:05 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:01 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 12:55 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  College-aged.

There's no debating from anybody the staffer in question pictured is 22. Currently. Still young enough to be on mommy and daddy's health insurance. Very much college-aged.

The congresswoman says it's not the staffer in the photo though.

I agree. But that means its even creepier.

The staffer she is kissing does not appear to be the same person shes with when she's butt naked. Its another young girl altogether.

Which means its even more rampant than we were led to believe.

The disturbing part is that apparently morals and ethics only matter for everyone who is not Democrat women and homosexual Democratic males (see Barney Frank). Let any male in Congress pull this stunt with leaked photos of him sitting naked grooming a younger woman with rumors of sexual encounters with staffers and it would be all over for their term in Congress.

Let a left coast liberal wench pull the stunt and we are urged to look away instead of applying appropriate reciprocity.

A G A I N, we don't know for a fact yet that these reports are true!

Can't we just wait until the investigation is done before jumping on our collective soap boxes?

Oh! So we are supposed to be blind now as well? Go whiz on yourself and claim it's raining. None of us were born yesterday, and thank God most of us were educated before the bizarre nonsense of the left was being taught in the place of courses needed to be effective in life.

(10-23-2019 01:13 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:11 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:05 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:01 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 12:55 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  College-aged.

There's no debating from anybody the staffer in question pictured is 22. Currently. Still young enough to be on mommy and daddy's health insurance. Very much college-aged.

The congresswoman says it's not the staffer in the photo though.

I agree. But that means its even creepier.

The staffer she is kissing does not appear to be the same person shes with when she's butt naked. Its another young girl altogether.

Which means its even more rampant than we were led to believe.

The disturbing part is that apparently morals and ethics only matter for everyone who is not Democrat women and homosexual Democratic males (see Barney Frank). Let any male in Congress pull this stunt with leaked photos of him sitting naked grooming a younger woman with rumors of sexual encounters with staffers and it would be all over for their term in Congress.

Let a left coast liberal wench pull the stunt and we are urged to look away instead of applying appropriate reciprocity.

A G A I N, we don't know for a fact yet that these reports are true!

Can't we just wait until the investigation is done before jumping on our collective soap boxes?

LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL

that's just too rich.

(10-23-2019 01:16 PM)zyxwvutsru Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:13 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:11 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:05 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:01 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  The congresswoman says it's not the staffer in the photo though.

I agree. But that means its even creepier.

The staffer she is kissing does not appear to be the same person shes with when she's butt naked. Its another young girl altogether.

Which means its even more rampant than we were led to believe.

The disturbing part is that apparently morals and ethics only matter for everyone who is not Democrat women and homosexual Democratic males (see Barney Frank). Let any male in Congress pull this stunt with leaked photos of him sitting naked grooming a younger woman with rumors of sexual encounters with staffers and it would be all over for their term in Congress.

Let a left coast liberal wench pull the stunt and we are urged to look away instead of applying appropriate reciprocity.

A G A I N, we don't know for a fact yet that these reports are true!

Can't we just wait until the investigation is done before jumping on our collective soap boxes?

LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL

that's just too rich.

His head is literally so far up his ass now that he can visually inspect his small intestine.

(10-23-2019 01:13 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:11 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:05 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:01 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 12:55 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  College-aged.

There's no debating from anybody the staffer in question pictured is 22. Currently. Still young enough to be on mommy and daddy's health insurance. Very much college-aged.

The congresswoman says it's not the staffer in the photo though.

I agree. But that means its even creepier.

The staffer she is kissing does not appear to be the same person shes with when she's butt naked. Its another young girl altogether.

Which means its even more rampant than we were led to believe.

The disturbing part is that apparently morals and ethics only matter for everyone who is not Democrat women and homosexual Democratic males (see Barney Frank). Let any male in Congress pull this stunt with leaked photos of him sitting naked grooming a younger woman with rumors of sexual encounters with staffers and it would be all over for their term in Congress.

Let a left coast liberal wench pull the stunt and we are urged to look away instead of applying appropriate reciprocity.

A G A I N, we don't know for a fact yet that these reports are true!

Can't we just wait until the investigation is done before jumping on our collective soap boxes?

Your ability to defend anything is admirable. And why the phuck would this be investigated? While sick, homosexual affairs with 22 year old staffers isn't illegal.

(10-23-2019 01:17 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:16 PM)zyxwvutsru Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:13 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:11 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:05 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  I agree. But that means its even creepier.

The staffer she is kissing does not appear to be the same person shes with when she's butt naked. Its another young girl altogether.

Which means its even more rampant than we were led to believe.

The disturbing part is that apparently morals and ethics only matter for everyone who is not Democrat women and homosexual Democratic males (see Barney Frank). Let any male in Congress pull this stunt with leaked photos of him sitting naked grooming a younger woman with rumors of sexual encounters with staffers and it would be all over for their term in Congress.

Let a left coast liberal wench pull the stunt and we are urged to look away instead of applying appropriate reciprocity.

A G A I N, we don't know for a fact yet that these reports are true!

Can't we just wait until the investigation is done before jumping on our collective soap boxes?

LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL

that's just too rich.

His head is literally so far up his ass now that he can visually inspect his small intestine.

That's only if he can see past those massive hemorrhoids that were created from years of straining to keep the truth from outing.

(10-23-2019 01:18 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:13 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:11 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:05 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:01 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  The congresswoman says it's not the staffer in the photo though.

I agree. But that means its even creepier.

The staffer she is kissing does not appear to be the same person shes with when she's butt naked. Its another young girl altogether.

Which means its even more rampant than we were led to believe.

The disturbing part is that apparently morals and ethics only matter for everyone who is not Democrat women and homosexual Democratic males (see Barney Frank). Let any male in Congress pull this stunt with leaked photos of him sitting naked grooming a younger woman with rumors of sexual encounters with staffers and it would be all over for their term in Congress.

Let a left coast liberal wench pull the stunt and we are urged to look away instead of applying appropriate reciprocity.

A G A I N, we don't know for a fact yet that these reports are true!

Can't we just wait until the investigation is done before jumping on our collective soap boxes?

Your ability to defend anything is admirable. And why the phuck would this be investigated? While sick, homosexual affairs with 22 year old staffers isn't illegal.

It would need to be investigated because it would have put her in a position of being blackmailed. The Russians literally have a pee tape of her. She's vice-chair of the house's armed forces committee.

(10-23-2019 01:16 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:13 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:11 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:05 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:01 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  The congresswoman says it's not the staffer in the photo though.

I agree. But that means its even creepier.

The staffer she is kissing does not appear to be the same person shes with when she's butt naked. Its another young girl altogether.

Which means its even more rampant than we were led to believe.

The disturbing part is that apparently morals and ethics only matter for everyone who is not Democrat women and homosexual Democratic males (see Barney Frank). Let any male in Congress pull this stunt with leaked photos of him sitting naked grooming a younger woman with rumors of sexual encounters with staffers and it would be all over for their term in Congress.

Let a left coast liberal wench pull the stunt and we are urged to look away instead of applying appropriate reciprocity.

A G A I N, we don't know for a fact yet that these reports are true!

Can't we just wait until the investigation is done before jumping on our collective soap boxes?

Oh! So we are supposed to be blind now as well? Go whiz on yourself and claim it's raining. None of us were born yesterday, and thank God most of us were educated before the bizarre nonsense of the left was being taught in the place of courses needed to be effective in life.

Since we're not blind...you then agree that trump should be removed from office?

(10-23-2019 01:24 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:16 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:13 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:11 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:05 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  I agree. But that means its even creepier.

The staffer she is kissing does not appear to be the same person shes with when she's butt naked. Its another young girl altogether.

Which means its even more rampant than we were led to believe.

The disturbing part is that apparently morals and ethics only matter for everyone who is not Democrat women and homosexual Democratic males (see Barney Frank). Let any male in Congress pull this stunt with leaked photos of him sitting naked grooming a younger woman with rumors of sexual encounters with staffers and it would be all over for their term in Congress.

Let a left coast liberal wench pull the stunt and we are urged to look away instead of applying appropriate reciprocity.

A G A I N, we don't know for a fact yet that these reports are true!

Can't we just wait until the investigation is done before jumping on our collective soap boxes?

Oh! So we are supposed to be blind now as well? Go whiz on yourself and claim it's raining. None of us were born yesterday, and thank God most of us were educated before the bizarre nonsense of the left was being taught in the place of courses needed to be effective in life.

Since we're not blind...you then agree that trump should be removed from office?

No. The crimes in D.C. reside in the House, not the White House.

(10-23-2019 01:18 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:13 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:11 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:05 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:01 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  The congresswoman says it's not the staffer in the photo though.

I agree. But that means its even creepier.

The staffer she is kissing does not appear to be the same person shes with when she's butt naked. Its another young girl altogether.

Which means its even more rampant than we were led to believe.

The disturbing part is that apparently morals and ethics only matter for everyone who is not Democrat women and homosexual Democratic males (see Barney Frank). Let any male in Congress pull this stunt with leaked photos of him sitting naked grooming a younger woman with rumors of sexual encounters with staffers and it would be all over for their term in Congress.

Let a left coast liberal wench pull the stunt and we are urged to look away instead of applying appropriate reciprocity.

A G A I N, we don't know for a fact yet that these reports are true!

Can't we just wait until the investigation is done before jumping on our collective soap boxes?

Your ability to defend anything is admirable. And why the phuck would this be investigated? While sick, homosexual affairs with 22 year old staffers isn't illegal.

I will defend our Constitution and our rule of law all day long skippy. If you have a problem with that it's on you, not me.

(10-23-2019 01:26 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:24 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:16 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:13 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:11 PM)JRsec Wrote:  The disturbing part is that apparently morals and ethics only matter for everyone who is not Democrat women and homosexual Democratic males (see Barney Frank). Let any male in Congress pull this stunt with leaked photos of him sitting naked grooming a younger woman with rumors of sexual encounters with staffers and it would be all over for their term in Congress.

Let a left coast liberal wench pull the stunt and we are urged to look away instead of applying appropriate reciprocity.

A G A I N, we don't know for a fact yet that these reports are true!

Can't we just wait until the investigation is done before jumping on our collective soap boxes?

Oh! So we are supposed to be blind now as well? Go whiz on yourself and claim it's raining. None of us were born yesterday, and thank God most of us were educated before the bizarre nonsense of the left was being taught in the place of courses needed to be effective in life.

Since we're not blind...you then agree that trump should be removed from office?

No. The crimes in D.C. reside in the House, not the White House.

So you ARE blind.