(07-21-2019 01:47 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  This is how the issue is correctly handled:

Quote:“I don’t believe the four Congresswomen are capable of loving our Country. They should apologize to America (and Israel) for the horrible (hateful) things they have said​."

Quote: “They are destroying the Democrat Party, but are weak & insecure people who can never destroy our great Nation!​”

President Trump would do well to have a 24-hour delay governor installed on his Twitter app.

LOL. 24 hours? That's not nearly long enough. Try 10 years. Some of the same things he's accusing the Squad members of saying are the same things he was saying when he was tweeting out criticism of Obama. But love it or leave it, right?

(07-21-2019 04:33 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  

(07-21-2019 01:47 PM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  This is how the issue is correctly handled:

Quote:“I don’t believe the four Congresswomen are capable of loving our Country. They should apologize to America (and Israel) for the horrible (hateful) things they have said​."

Quote: “They are destroying the Democrat Party, but are weak & insecure people who can never destroy our great Nation!​”

President Trump would do well to have a 24-hour delay governor installed on his Twitter app.

LOL. 24 hours? That's not nearly long enough. Try 10 years. Some of the same things he's accusing the Squad members of saying are the same things he was saying when he was tweeting out criticism of Obama. But love it or leave it, right?

Got an example of that?

Last time I tried providing an example (examples) of something from someone on the right, I was later downvoted by another person for the post. It takes a pretty petty individual to downvote you for responding to them to begin with and then being negatively rated for your post. If you don't like the post, be a man (or woman) and respond with your points in person and not try to hide behind a rating system.

But anyway, here's a story in The Guardian that goes into that in detail. I realize there are some fundamental differences in the Trump quotes and that from the Squad, but it all stems down to what Trump said at the rally before love it or leave it. That's why I said 'some of the things' and not a majority or all, etc.

“They’re always telling us how to run it, how to do this, how to do that. You know what? If they don’t love it, tell ’em to leave it.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019...m-to-leave

(07-21-2019 05:45 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  Last time I tried providing an example (examples) of something from someone on the right, I was later downvoted by another person for the post. It takes a pretty petty individual to downvote you for responding to them to begin with and then being negatively rated for your post. If you don't like the post, be a man (or woman) and respond with your points in person and not try to hide behind a rating system.

But anyway, here's a story in The Guardian that goes into that in detail. I realize there are some fundamental differences in the Trump quotes and that from the Squad, but it all stems down to what Trump said at the rally before love it or leave it. That's why I said 'some of the things' and not a majority or all, etc.

“They’re always telling us how to run it, how to do this, how to do that. You know what? If they don’t love it, tell ’em to leave it.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019...m-to-leave

-3 you don't intimidate anyone Mr. Anti America

(07-21-2019 05:45 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  Last time I tried providing an example (examples) of something from someone on the right, I was later downvoted by another person for the post. It takes a pretty petty individual to downvote you for responding to them to begin with and then being negatively rated for your post. If you don't like the post, be a man (or woman) and respond with your points in person and not try to hide behind a rating system.

But anyway, here's a story in The Guardian that goes into that in detail. I realize there are some fundamental differences in the Trump quotes and that from the Squad, but it all stems down to what Trump said at the rally before love it or leave it. That's why I said 'some of the things' and not a majority or all, etc.

“They’re always telling us how to run it, how to do this, how to do that. You know what? If they don’t love it, tell ’em to leave it.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019...m-to-leave

The guardian?

Is this seriously still a topic?

(07-22-2019 08:14 AM)VA49er Wrote:  Is this seriously still a topic?

Until something else comes up I guess

(07-22-2019 08:16 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(07-22-2019 08:14 AM)VA49er Wrote:  Is this seriously still a topic?

Until something else comes up I guess

I guess some left talking points are in the hopper and the usual suspects will be on shortly. Seems like they could come up with something substantial to discuss but it'll probably be more of the same silly nonsense.

(07-21-2019 05:45 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  Last time I tried providing an example (examples) of something from someone on the right, I was later downvoted by another person for the post. It takes a pretty petty individual to downvote you for responding to them to begin with and then being negatively rated for your post. If you don't like the post, be a man (or woman) and respond with your points in person and not try to hide behind a rating system.

But anyway, here's a story in The Guardian that goes into that in detail. I realize there are some fundamental differences in the Trump quotes and that from the Squad, but it all stems down to what Trump said at the rally before love it or leave it. That's why I said 'some of the things' and not a majority or all, etc.

“They’re always telling us how to run it, how to do this, how to do that. You know what? If they don’t love it, tell ’em to leave it.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019...m-to-leave

These are criticizing things that are wrong in America, not its very foundation as many Democrats do. Michelle's-"first time I've ever been pround of America." Its totally different making America Great Again as opposed to "America was never great."

America is the greatest country in the world. Its been a shining beacon on a hill. It was never perfect, but has been the best there is since 1776. The Europeans got rid of slavery and criticized us for being slow in getting rid of it, but they had a near enslavement of vast territories around the world. We badly mistreated the Indians, but we settled our country the same way the Angles ("English") and Saxons settled England and the Russians settled Russia. For that matter, the same as the Germans, the Celts and the Cro-Magnons.

(07-22-2019 07:49 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(07-21-2019 05:45 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  Last time I tried providing an example (examples) of something from someone on the right, I was later downvoted by another person for the post. It takes a pretty petty individual to downvote you for responding to them to begin with and then being negatively rated for your post. If you don't like the post, be a man (or woman) and respond with your points in person and not try to hide behind a rating system.

But anyway, here's a story in The Guardian that goes into that in detail. I realize there are some fundamental differences in the Trump quotes and that from the Squad, but it all stems down to what Trump said at the rally before love it or leave it. That's why I said 'some of the things' and not a majority or all, etc.

“They’re always telling us how to run it, how to do this, how to do that. You know what? If they don’t love it, tell ’em to leave it.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019...m-to-leave

The guardian?

Its a leftist paper. Its actually a lot more readable than Slate, Vox, Huff Post and even the fake News York Times.

(07-21-2019 05:45 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  I realize there are some fundamental differences in the Trump quotes and that from the Squad...

You do? Really?

Trump has done it, yet again. He really has.

I just watched a round-table discussion on Fox, and one of the dems' better spin doctors (Mary Anne Marsh) was stuck defending absolute nonsense, because of the corner the dems' have painted themselves into by defending the squad.

She hit all the classics, muh racism, muh dark heart, kids of color in cages, etc., which was all shut down by the fact that dems have come out as pro-open borders and pro-free health care for illegals and anyone in the world that can manage to get here.

Then it turned to what actually matters to American voters (the economy), and she tried -- with a straight face -- to say that Trump is killing jobs and inflation is out of control because of tariffs. Yikes.

The 2 other people on the panel could barely hold back their laughter. 1 pointed out the obvious, that the economy is roaring, unemployment is at an all-time low, and inflation is low and stable. Everyone agreed. Marsh sank in her chair.

All the dems had to do was not be crazy.

(07-22-2019 09:30 AM)Kronke Wrote:  Trump has done it, yet again. He really has.

I just watched a round-table discussion on Fox, and one of the dems' better spin doctors (Mary Anne Marsh) was stuck defending absolute nonsense, because of the corner the dems' have painted themselves into by defending the squad.

She hit all the classics, muh racism, muh dark heart, kids of color in cages, etc., which was all shut down by the fact that dems have come out as pro-open borders and pro-free health care for illegals.

Then it turned to what actually matters to American voters (the economy), she tried -- with a straight face -- to say that Trump is killing jobs and inflation is out of control because of tariffs. Yikes.

The 2 other people on the panel could barely hold back their laughter. 1 pointed out the obvious, that the economy is roaring, unemployment is at an all-time low, and inflation is low and stable. Everyone agreed. Marsh sank in her chair.

All the dems had to do was not be crazy.

Crazy right?

Who'd thought a successful business man could run the country better than career politicians?

(07-21-2019 05:45 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  Last time I tried providing an example (examples) of something from someone on the right, I was later downvoted by another person for the post. It takes a pretty petty individual to downvote you for responding to them to begin with and then being negatively rated for your post. If you don't like the post, be a man (or woman) and respond with your points in person and not try to hide behind a rating system.

But anyway, here's a story in The Guardian that goes into that in detail. I realize there are some fundamental differences in the Trump quotes and that from the Squad, but it all stems down to what Trump said at the rally before love it or leave it. That's why I said 'some of the things' and not a majority or all, etc.

“They’re always telling us how to run it, how to do this, how to do that. You know what? If they don’t love it, tell ’em to leave it.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019...m-to-leave

You're essentially admitting here (and the article certainly is) that 'what he's quoted as saying' isn't what he said. So whom is stirring the pot/inciting discord? The person who is lying about what was said (not you, the 4 and others) or the person being misquoted?

If it's 'close enough' to what he said, then why can't they just say what he said without 'that implies' or 'meaning' or taking part of one conversation and part of another and acting as if they were the same conversation? You guys act as if this is so clear, but then you have to piece together some timeline and make some inferences in order to demonstrate that.

Absolutely, if you don't love this country, nobody is keeping anyone here. Why do you think 'the four' have been so quick to claim that they DO love this country? I think it a fair criticism of people who do almost nothing but complain... 'then why are you here?'

If I said to you based on something that you said... if you're unhappy in your job, then get a new job... would you consider that telling you that you're a bad employee or good therapeutic advice?

I ask that because that is exactly how tens of millions (maybe 100mm+?) of people in this country feel. You can push for improvements without acting like we're 'deplorable' just because we have a different view.

https://amgreatness.com/2019/07/22/cant-...get-along/
Talks about Dems "civility."

"...We now forget that half the country was quite upset by the 2008 election of Barack Obama, not because of his race, but out of concern that he had been the most partisan voting senator of the era in the entire U.S. Senate.

Opponents were taken aback when he boasted, shortly before his victory, about fundamentally “transforming” the country. During the campaign he had urged his supporters to take a gun to a knife fight and to “get in their faces” (which targets did he signify by “their”?), as well as writing off the Pennsylvania working class as backward gun and bible clingers, and his own grandmother as a “typical white person” (what did he mean by “typical” and did it apply to 230 million Americans?). The idea of Obama as a healer was a myth and analogous to the fable of a Noble Peace Prize winning global activist.

Obama mocked charges that Trinity Unity Church of Christ of Chicago was fueled by racism, by swearing he could no more disown Rev. Jerimiah Wright—his anti-Semitic, racist, and anti-American personal pastor, whose kindergarten banal sermons on the “audacity of hope” became the inspiration for Obama’s second book—than the grandmother who raised and nurtured him.

What did Obama mean when he weighed in during the Trayvon Martin affair by remarking that Martin might have resembled the son he never had? Did he need to slander the police in the Skip Gates affair or demagogue the Ferguson melodrama?

What exactly were Obama’s own injunctions about knowing when to quit making lots of money, or to acknowledge that one does not build his own business, or to realize that it is not a time to profit ever to apply to his post-presidential, lucrative self—or was all that just transitory boilerplate demagoguery aimed at a particular class of which he had not quite yet joined?

Congressional Republicans and conservative media announced they wanted no part of Obama’s promised radical progressive “transformation,” especially his plan to nationalize health care. They nonstop promised that they would do their best to stop him...."

(07-22-2019 10:37 AM)bullet Wrote:  https://amgreatness.com/2019/07/22/cant-...get-along/
Talks about Dems "civility."

"...We now forget that half the country was quite upset by the 2008 election of Barack Obama, not because of his race, but out of concern that he had been the most partisan voting senator of the era in the entire U.S. Senate.

Opponents were taken aback when he boasted, shortly before his victory, about fundamentally “transforming” the country. During the campaign he had urged his supporters to take a gun to a knife fight and to “get in their faces” (which targets did he signify by “their”?), as well as writing off the Pennsylvania working class as backward gun and bible clingers, and his own grandmother as a “typical white person” (what did he mean by “typical” and did it apply to 230 million Americans?). The idea of Obama as a healer was a myth and analogous to the fable of a Noble Peace Prize winning global activist.

Obama mocked charges that Trinity Unity Church of Christ of Chicago was fueled by racism, by swearing he could no more disown Rev. Jerimiah Wright—his anti-Semitic, racist, and anti-American personal pastor, whose kindergarten banal sermons on the “audacity of hope” became the inspiration for Obama’s second book—than the grandmother who raised and nurtured him.

What did Obama mean when he weighed in during the Trayvon Martin affair by remarking that Martin might have resembled the son he never had? Did he need to slander the police in the Skip Gates affair or demagogue the Ferguson melodrama?

What exactly were Obama’s own injunctions about knowing when to quit making lots of money, or to acknowledge that one does not build his own business, or to realize that it is not a time to profit ever to apply to his post-presidential, lucrative self—or was all that just transitory boilerplate demagoguery aimed at a particular class of which he had not quite yet joined?

Congressional Republicans and conservative media announced they wanted no part of Obama’s promised radical progressive “transformation,” especially his plan to nationalize health care. They nonstop promised that they would do their best to stop him...."

How dare you.. That was the best 8 years that ever was..