(06-24-2019 12:04 PM)SMUfan Wrote: I don't believe that the AAC is surprised by this. I believe they have been prepared to replace UConn for quite a while.
UConn's attendance was hovering around 10k. The state put up $90m for their stadium, but they're still on the hook for I dunno, 20, 30, 40m. Their pulling the plug on football isn't much of a shock, and the AAC wasn't going to allow them to stay without it, so I agree with you on this.
I'm sure that their decision makers and power brokers already had a short list. I don't know that we were on it, but once the various schools started the lobbying, UAB clearly rises to somewhere around the top. They may grab Buffalo or Akron, or Boise/BYU/Army may decide to go for it, or they may just leave it open for a bit, I have no way to know.
What I do know is that we are in a far, far better position to be considered then we ever have been. Once the new stadium opens we'll look even better.
We need our fans to rise to the challenge, to talk it up, to be positive, to buy season tickets. That sort of thing is all that we, as fans, can do to help things out.