(05-15-2019 03:17 PM)ODU BBALL Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 03:06 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 01:05 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 12:52 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 12:28 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  So you think the response (that for some reason you cant state explicitly) of 'well.... *only* about 60% of them are Democratic donors, and the rest non-donors, and of the donations made, the donations were 30 to fing one for the Democratic side' somehow helps your position?

Again.... lolololololololol.

As for your extraordinarily dated 'proof' -- perhaps facts change in the intervening two years.... eh?

Try this one on sparky:



and


https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/05/r...ate-staff/

My "position" is that there were not 16 democratic donors on Mueller's team. And there weren't. Do you have other facts?

*Just* 14.... Yep. That is one huge mfing difference you are pushing there tom.

*Completely* changes the thrust of the issue..... *completely* I tell ya.....

This is like the **** for brains dude my client sued for stealing approximately $10k from them. His defense was that it was only 8900...... That idiot thought it was dispositive for the overall issue, much like we are seeing here.

Not 14, 12. Again, to me, facts matter. But good to know that I no longer have to present facts...just as long as my lies are trivial. #ETTD

Well Leftwing ... the FACT is that Mueller's investigation team was heavily weighted to the Liberal persuasion as evidenced by their donations to the Democrat cause. Taking all of that bias into account, they still came up with nothing against the Trump campaign per the final report.

His leading investigator/lawyer was freaking at Canks inevitable victory party.

Wonder if he cried too, then grabbed a vase of unused flowers and sulked on home. Nah, no potential bias there.

And another was a lawyer for the Clinton Foundation. You can’t make this chit up.

The left, as evidenced on these pages, is already calling this investigation into the investigators a partisan witch hunt. The absurdity is beyond belief......

More proof that Barr is a serious badass:

Quote:Today at a law enforcement ceremony at Capitol:

AG Barr approached Pelosi, shook her hand: "Madam Speaker, did you bring your handcuffs?"

Pelosi smiled and, per a bystander, told Barr the House Sergeant at Arms was there should an arrest be needed. Barr laughed; walked away

I double dog dare you to arrest me...... lolz......

https://twitter.com/npfandos/status/1128729515365216257

It was reported tonite that a grand jury has been convened.

buckle up

(05-15-2019 09:10 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  It was reported tonite that a grand jury has been convened.

buckle up

They must be about to indict Trump.......





Sarcasm

What happens when Barr's second 4 page summary contradicts the investigation that has already been completed?

(05-15-2019 11:27 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  What happens when Barr's second 4 page summary contradicts the investigation that has already been completed?

How stupid are you? The report is public. Are you suggesting he will simply lie straight faced to the American public like Clinton did?

(05-15-2019 11:40 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 11:27 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  What happens when Barr's second 4 page summary contradicts the investigation that has already been completed?

How stupid are you? The report is public. Are you suggesting he will simply lie straight faced to the American public like Clinton did?

That's what trump fixers do.

(05-15-2019 11:27 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  What happens when Barr's second 4 page summary contradicts the investigation that has already been completed?

Well, first there would have to be a 4 page summary that contradicts the results of an investigation.

(05-16-2019 06:50 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 11:27 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  What happens when Barr's second 4 page summary contradicts the investigation that has already been completed?

Well, first there would have to be a 4 page summary that contradicts the results of an investigation.

Math is hard for someone from Alabama.

(05-16-2019 07:10 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(05-16-2019 06:50 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 11:27 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  What happens when Barr's second 4 page summary contradicts the investigation that has already been completed?

Well, first there would have to be a 4 page summary that contradicts the results of an investigation.

Math is hard for someone from Alabama.

Hey! I'm from Alabama. Of course I moved to Texas, so I'm from Alabama and not in Alabama. But I am headed to the OBA for a week this summer.

(05-16-2019 07:14 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-16-2019 07:10 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(05-16-2019 06:50 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 11:27 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  What happens when Barr's second 4 page summary contradicts the investigation that has already been completed?

Well, first there would have to be a 4 page summary that contradicts the results of an investigation.

Math is hard for someone from Alabama.

Hey! I'm from Alabama. Of course I moved to Texas, so I'm from Alabama and not in Alabama. But I am headed to the OBA for a week this summer.

Just left Alabama.. I know now why we always made fun of them when I was growing up in Mississippi..

(05-16-2019 07:17 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(05-16-2019 07:14 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-16-2019 07:10 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(05-16-2019 06:50 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 11:27 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  What happens when Barr's second 4 page summary contradicts the investigation that has already been completed?

Well, first there would have to be a 4 page summary that contradicts the results of an investigation.

Math is hard for someone from Alabama.

Hey! I'm from Alabama. Of course I moved to Texas, so I'm from Alabama and not in Alabama. But I am headed to the OBA for a week this summer.

Just left Alabama.. I know now why we always made fun of them when I was growing up in Mississippi..

Yeah, in Alabama they used to say, thank God for Mississippi. Not sure they can say that anymore.

(05-16-2019 07:23 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(05-16-2019 07:17 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(05-16-2019 07:14 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-16-2019 07:10 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(05-16-2019 06:50 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  Well, first there would have to be a 4 page summary that contradicts the results of an investigation.

Math is hard for someone from Alabama.

Hey! I'm from Alabama. Of course I moved to Texas, so I'm from Alabama and not in Alabama. But I am headed to the OBA for a week this summer.

Just left Alabama.. I know now why we always made fun of them when I was growing up in Mississippi..

Yeah, in Alabama they used to say, thank God for Mississippi. Not sure they can say that anymore.

Alabama.. Mississippi's ugly twin.

https://amgreatness.com/2019/05/15/the-f...hoaxsters/

Rosenstein, along with McCabe and Baker at risk.

For those that see this in time and are able to get to a TV, William Barr is being interviewed this morning on Fox News in the 9 AM (EST)hour. This is an - up to this point in time - exclusive interview of the AG since his appointment of Prosecutor Durham.

(05-17-2019 07:55 AM)ODU BBALL Wrote:  For those that see this in time and are able to get to a TV, William Barr is being interviewed this morning on Fox News in the 9 AM (EST)hour. This is an - up to this point in time - exclusive interview of the AG since his appointment of Prosecutor Durham.

Should be very interesting. In an early outtake Barr says he’s not getting answers and some of the answers he is getting don’t align.

It’s gone to deep to be swept under the rug now. The next couple of years are going to be an incredible point in American history.

Some will not watch FOX. The MSM will probably not even mention his appearance. Many in this country and on this MB will remain ignorant.

(05-17-2019 08:30 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  Some will not watch FOX. The MSM will probably not even mention his appearance. Many in this country and on this MB will remain ignorant.

How true. Fox is quite possibly the only news organization that got the story right. At the very least they appear to have gotten a lot more of the story right than the main stream media did. Most likely that is because the main stream media had liberal political bias driving their own coverage to the extent that they could not be factual.

(05-17-2019 09:36 AM)ODU BBALL Wrote:  

(05-17-2019 08:30 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  Some will not watch FOX. The MSM will probably not even mention his appearance. Many in this country and on this MB will remain ignorant.

How true. Fox is quite possibly the only news organization that got the story right. At the very least they appear to have gotten a lot more of the story right than the main stream media did. Most likely that is because the main stream media had liberal political bias driving their own coverage to the extent that they could not be factual.

The MSM is the reason for the Russian investigation. The FBI and CIA leaked info to them and used the MSM reports as the reason for the investigation. Why would they report an investigation the will include them?