(05-06-2019 12:51 PM)TripleA Wrote:  a professional IT programmer/analyst

Yes... but are you c/c++ MasterRace or a user of one of those newer hipster languages like ruby/clojure/crystal?

(05-06-2019 12:52 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  lol...When your posts are 1000% hard left 1000% of time---you aren't a "independent". I mean, if you really believe what you post---why run away from it?

Because he doesn't believe in anything other than what he's told to believe at the current point in time. He doesn't want to be held to account for what he's said because he knows the narrative can change at any point in time.

This is why they can NEVER stand by any issue. They shift positions as soon as its convenient or necessary.

(05-06-2019 12:44 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(05-06-2019 12:36 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  And I have no love or affiliation for/with the democratic party whatsoever, so you can take off all the gloves as far as I'm concerned and let the chips fall where they may.

We need to add that tactic to "whataboutism" since "You're one too" has been around as long if not longer than "whataboutism". It's a fight for survival and the current ideology of the Left is anti-American, injurious to the health of my children and grandchildren, erosive of our Republic, and openly opposed to various aspects of our Bill of Rights. I am fully aware. My gloves have been off for decades. It's just that I've seen the face of my enemy long enough to recognize it, to be familiar with its tactics, and ever suspicious of its adherents. And RWT if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, and acts like Daffy, it's a damn duck. Sorry if that makes you feel labeled there Ducky!

Did you miss his confession there? He's not a Democrat... he just admitted he's a far leftist who's not a member of the mainstream party.
We know good and well he's not a republican, and he's sure as hell not a Libertarian.

He's an extremist, through and through. He's the very thing he projects that he hates. I guess that's why he hates them so much... they are a mirror that he sees himself in.

(05-06-2019 01:14 PM)q5sys Wrote:  

(05-06-2019 12:44 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(05-06-2019 12:36 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  And I have no love or affiliation for/with the democratic party whatsoever, so you can take off all the gloves as far as I'm concerned and let the chips fall where they may.

We need to add that tactic to "whataboutism" since "You're one too" has been around as long if not longer than "whataboutism". It's a fight for survival and the current ideology of the Left is anti-American, injurious to the health of my children and grandchildren, erosive of our Republic, and openly opposed to various aspects of our Bill of Rights. I am fully aware. My gloves have been off for decades. It's just that I've seen the face of my enemy long enough to recognize it, to be familiar with its tactics, and ever suspicious of its adherents. And RWT if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, and acts like Daffy, it's a damn duck. Sorry if that makes you feel labeled there Ducky!

Did you miss his confession there? He's not a Democrat... he just admitted he's a far leftist who's not a member of the mainstream party.
We know good and well he's not a republican, and he's sure as hell not a Libertarian.

He's an extremist, through and through. He's the very thing he projects that he hates. I guess that's why he hates them so much... they are a mirror that he sees himself in.

I didn't miss his confession. Did you understand what I meant by the enemy? I'm an old cold warrior. I know a Red when I see one. Hence the old if it walks like a duck reference. It was before your time but oft used in the 50's to describe one. My only levity was the Daffy reference because he's just not as good at being a Red as some of those who teach in higher education. They disguise their motives now by wrapping themselves in their stated, though not acted upon, empathy for any seemingly disenfranchised group. But it's the same old politics of division when it was the proletariat against the privileged garbage.

If you want to understand the immigration issue then you need only look at the politics of division. We never had enough fully disturbed minorities for them to leverage major change. So now the Reds hook up with corporate America who wants more consumers (since the government will put money in their pockets) but which will not hire many of the immigrants. That creates the gap between finding a better life and wanting free stuff from a government you never culturally understood or supported. So they are growing their base for rebellion. But with the Boomers exiting the stage and the Corporations concerned about domestic consumption the log jam in Washington is keeping us from nipping this threat in the bud.

I may be old, and not as tech savvy as you, but I've been in this game a long long time, and am disgusted at what I see every day, and I totally got what this dupe is spouting both in his actual words, and in his usage of words that belies his position.

Pumpkin Papers and Tennessee Warblers baby!

RWT is a perfect example of why Russian Facebook adds had little to absolutely no effect on the election. His attempts to change a single view of anyone here are complete and epic failure.

(05-06-2019 12:36 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-06-2019 12:29 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(05-03-2019 06:32 PM)appst89 Wrote:  

(05-03-2019 04:17 PM)q5sys Wrote:  I was going to respond to this post with a well thought out explanation about how TDB and Redwingtom are perfect examples of the lefts failure to be objective about information and how they intake all information through their narrative, and lock onto details that fit that narrative and ignore everything else...
But after writing it... I realized... what's the point in that. I've tried that before and I end up wasting my time. Redwingtom is incapable of having a nuanced view of anything, he's never objective about anything, and the moment he's called out or proven wrong with facts he'll just change the subject to be something else so he can still 'appear' to be correct.
If I want to have a discussion like that, I might as well call my 8 yo niece.

But to everyone else, dont waste your time on the TDB article or what Redwingtom quoted. The article is about Blackwater and Blackwaters actions... it's not about O'keefe, he's simply a narrative element and an example to explain the story of Blackwater.

Spot on.

Well for the sake of argument let's take it a step beyond. Let's assume a former intelligence operative did train the group. So what! Does RWT not want to own the fact that every DNC political action group has been schooled in Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals", that some of them receive PAC money that has been washed to hide the fact that it comes from our potential adversaries from beyond our borders. And that indeed many of the corporations that give to the PAC do the washing of that money because they operate in said nations of concern.

I doubt there is any substance to RWT's assertions, but it just makes me wonder if the left really wants the right to take off the blinders, take off the gloves, and fight the same way that the left does? Perhaps it is not only appropriate that the intelligence community should be concerned about these matters, but actually should make it a point of emphasis to be involved in the education of the right!

The only assertion I made is that O'Keefe is ignorant. Is that really a stretch? And I have no love or affiliation for/with the democratic party whatsoever, so you can take off all the gloves as far as I'm concerned and let the chips fall where they may. I'm fairly confident the right is just as bad as the left in this arena...and if you don't also, you're fooling yourself.

The dumb a s s article, that you probably wrote, does not even mention O'Keefe going through the training. It mentioned another guy that quit the program. What is wrong with being ignorant BTW. I am ignorant on the topic of Sit Coms, I don't watch them, so what. What an epic fail of a thread.

(05-06-2019 01:59 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(05-06-2019 12:36 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-06-2019 12:29 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(05-03-2019 06:32 PM)appst89 Wrote:  

(05-03-2019 04:17 PM)q5sys Wrote:  I was going to respond to this post with a well thought out explanation about how TDB and Redwingtom are perfect examples of the lefts failure to be objective about information and how they intake all information through their narrative, and lock onto details that fit that narrative and ignore everything else...
But after writing it... I realized... what's the point in that. I've tried that before and I end up wasting my time. Redwingtom is incapable of having a nuanced view of anything, he's never objective about anything, and the moment he's called out or proven wrong with facts he'll just change the subject to be something else so he can still 'appear' to be correct.
If I want to have a discussion like that, I might as well call my 8 yo niece.

But to everyone else, dont waste your time on the TDB article or what Redwingtom quoted. The article is about Blackwater and Blackwaters actions... it's not about O'keefe, he's simply a narrative element and an example to explain the story of Blackwater.

Spot on.

Well for the sake of argument let's take it a step beyond. Let's assume a former intelligence operative did train the group. So what! Does RWT not want to own the fact that every DNC political action group has been schooled in Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals", that some of them receive PAC money that has been washed to hide the fact that it comes from our potential adversaries from beyond our borders. And that indeed many of the corporations that give to the PAC do the washing of that money because they operate in said nations of concern.

I doubt there is any substance to RWT's assertions, but it just makes me wonder if the left really wants the right to take off the blinders, take off the gloves, and fight the same way that the left does? Perhaps it is not only appropriate that the intelligence community should be concerned about these matters, but actually should make it a point of emphasis to be involved in the education of the right!

The only assertion I made is that O'Keefe is ignorant. Is that really a stretch? And I have no love or affiliation for/with the democratic party whatsoever, so you can take off all the gloves as far as I'm concerned and let the chips fall where they may. I'm fairly confident the right is just as bad as the left in this arena...and if you don't also, you're fooling yourself.

The dumb a s s article, that you probably wrote, does not even mention O'Keefe going through the training. It mentioned another guy that quit the program. What is wrong with being ignorant BTW. I am ignorant on the topic of Sit Coms, I don't watch them, so what. What an epic fail of a thread.

Correct.

Being ignorant is completely ok. Like being ignorant of what an insurance deductible is.

Now, a FOOL is someone who's ignorant but who pretends he knows what he's talking about. For instance, if you pretended to understand health insurance in order to lecture us, but in your lecture its clear that you have no idea what an insurance deductible is, then you are a FOOL.

Note: The above post is legal according to the RedWingTom AUP version, which he published today in another thread.

(05-06-2019 01:59 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(05-06-2019 12:36 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-06-2019 12:29 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(05-03-2019 06:32 PM)appst89 Wrote:  

(05-03-2019 04:17 PM)q5sys Wrote:  I was going to respond to this post with a well thought out explanation about how TDB and Redwingtom are perfect examples of the lefts failure to be objective about information and how they intake all information through their narrative, and lock onto details that fit that narrative and ignore everything else...
But after writing it... I realized... what's the point in that. I've tried that before and I end up wasting my time. Redwingtom is incapable of having a nuanced view of anything, he's never objective about anything, and the moment he's called out or proven wrong with facts he'll just change the subject to be something else so he can still 'appear' to be correct.
If I want to have a discussion like that, I might as well call my 8 yo niece.

But to everyone else, dont waste your time on the TDB article or what Redwingtom quoted. The article is about Blackwater and Blackwaters actions... it's not about O'keefe, he's simply a narrative element and an example to explain the story of Blackwater.

Spot on.

Well for the sake of argument let's take it a step beyond. Let's assume a former intelligence operative did train the group. So what! Does RWT not want to own the fact that every DNC political action group has been schooled in Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals", that some of them receive PAC money that has been washed to hide the fact that it comes from our potential adversaries from beyond our borders. And that indeed many of the corporations that give to the PAC do the washing of that money because they operate in said nations of concern.

I doubt there is any substance to RWT's assertions, but it just makes me wonder if the left really wants the right to take off the blinders, take off the gloves, and fight the same way that the left does? Perhaps it is not only appropriate that the intelligence community should be concerned about these matters, but actually should make it a point of emphasis to be involved in the education of the right!

The only assertion I made is that O'Keefe is ignorant. Is that really a stretch? And I have no love or affiliation for/with the democratic party whatsoever, so you can take off all the gloves as far as I'm concerned and let the chips fall where they may. I'm fairly confident the right is just as bad as the left in this arena...and if you don't also, you're fooling yourself.

The dumb a s s article, that you probably wrote, does not even mention O'Keefe going through the training. It mentioned another guy that quit the program. What is wrong with being ignorant BTW. I am ignorant on the topic of Sit Coms, I don't watch them, so what. What an epic fail of a thread.

Did you read the intercept article linked in the Daily Beast story from my original post? It contains this link to a social media post of O'Keefe talking about taking the training. Sorry.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BQYxRGxByZa/

O'Keefe must be really getting under Commie Tom's skin lol.

(05-06-2019 02:14 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-06-2019 01:59 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(05-06-2019 12:36 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-06-2019 12:29 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(05-03-2019 06:32 PM)appst89 Wrote:  Spot on.

Well for the sake of argument let's take it a step beyond. Let's assume a former intelligence operative did train the group. So what! Does RWT not want to own the fact that every DNC political action group has been schooled in Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals", that some of them receive PAC money that has been washed to hide the fact that it comes from our potential adversaries from beyond our borders. And that indeed many of the corporations that give to the PAC do the washing of that money because they operate in said nations of concern.

I doubt there is any substance to RWT's assertions, but it just makes me wonder if the left really wants the right to take off the blinders, take off the gloves, and fight the same way that the left does? Perhaps it is not only appropriate that the intelligence community should be concerned about these matters, but actually should make it a point of emphasis to be involved in the education of the right!

The only assertion I made is that O'Keefe is ignorant. Is that really a stretch? And I have no love or affiliation for/with the democratic party whatsoever, so you can take off all the gloves as far as I'm concerned and let the chips fall where they may. I'm fairly confident the right is just as bad as the left in this arena...and if you don't also, you're fooling yourself.

The dumb a s s article, that you probably wrote, does not even mention O'Keefe going through the training. It mentioned another guy that quit the program. What is wrong with being ignorant BTW. I am ignorant on the topic of Sit Coms, I don't watch them, so what. What an epic fail of a thread.

Did you read the intercept article linked in the Daily Beast story from my original post?It contains this link to a social media post of O'Keefe talking about taking the training. Sorry.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BQYxRGxByZa/

And the question is; Name three sources in which a intelligent sane person would immediately become stupid if they read them.

(05-06-2019 02:16 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  O'Keefe must be really getting under Commie Tom's skin lol.

Nice deflection attempt. Well, actually...a horrible one. O'keefe is a complete ******* that does nothing but provide me with the opportunity to laugh at him and those who continue to defend him.

So by all means...keep me laughing!

(05-06-2019 02:14 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-06-2019 01:59 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(05-06-2019 12:36 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-06-2019 12:29 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(05-03-2019 06:32 PM)appst89 Wrote:  Spot on.

Well for the sake of argument let's take it a step beyond. Let's assume a former intelligence operative did train the group. So what! Does RWT not want to own the fact that every DNC political action group has been schooled in Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals", that some of them receive PAC money that has been washed to hide the fact that it comes from our potential adversaries from beyond our borders. And that indeed many of the corporations that give to the PAC do the washing of that money because they operate in said nations of concern.

I doubt there is any substance to RWT's assertions, but it just makes me wonder if the left really wants the right to take off the blinders, take off the gloves, and fight the same way that the left does? Perhaps it is not only appropriate that the intelligence community should be concerned about these matters, but actually should make it a point of emphasis to be involved in the education of the right!

The only assertion I made is that O'Keefe is ignorant. Is that really a stretch? And I have no love or affiliation for/with the democratic party whatsoever, so you can take off all the gloves as far as I'm concerned and let the chips fall where they may. I'm fairly confident the right is just as bad as the left in this arena...and if you don't also, you're fooling yourself.

The dumb a s s article, that you probably wrote, does not even mention O'Keefe going through the training. It mentioned another guy that quit the program. What is wrong with being ignorant BTW. I am ignorant on the topic of Sit Coms, I don't watch them, so what. What an epic fail of a thread.

Did you read the intercept article linked in the Daily Beast story from my original post? It contains this link to a social media post of O'Keefe talking about taking the training. Sorry.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BQYxRGxByZa/

So what?

These are likely a bunch of trust-fund young-uns that went to Northwestern school of journalism or an Ivy or something. Now they're supposed to adapt/adopt being a psy-op warrior or whatever?

guess what? I tried for a while and really couldn't dribble a ball worth a damn. I could try, I understood the game and rules, still couldn't pull it off. just like a lot of people can't learn to cook, or ride a motorcycle or an infinite number of other things.

Means bumpass about their "ignorance" or intelligence.

Dumb article. Even worse thread.

(05-06-2019 02:14 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-06-2019 01:59 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(05-06-2019 12:36 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-06-2019 12:29 PM)JRsec Wrote:  

(05-03-2019 06:32 PM)appst89 Wrote:  Spot on.

Well for the sake of argument let's take it a step beyond. Let's assume a former intelligence operative did train the group. So what! Does RWT not want to own the fact that every DNC political action group has been schooled in Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals", that some of them receive PAC money that has been washed to hide the fact that it comes from our potential adversaries from beyond our borders. And that indeed many of the corporations that give to the PAC do the washing of that money because they operate in said nations of concern.

I doubt there is any substance to RWT's assertions, but it just makes me wonder if the left really wants the right to take off the blinders, take off the gloves, and fight the same way that the left does? Perhaps it is not only appropriate that the intelligence community should be concerned about these matters, but actually should make it a point of emphasis to be involved in the education of the right!

The only assertion I made is that O'Keefe is ignorant. Is that really a stretch? And I have no love or affiliation for/with the democratic party whatsoever, so you can take off all the gloves as far as I'm concerned and let the chips fall where they may. I'm fairly confident the right is just as bad as the left in this arena...and if you don't also, you're fooling yourself.

The dumb a s s article, that you probably wrote, does not even mention O'Keefe going through the training. It mentioned another guy that quit the program. What is wrong with being ignorant BTW. I am ignorant on the topic of Sit Coms, I don't watch them, so what. What an epic fail of a thread.

Did you read the intercept article linked in the Daily Beast story from my original post? It contains this link to a social media post of O'Keefe talking about taking the training. Sorry.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BQYxRGxByZa/

Maybe you should have posted the Intercept article instead of your propaganda site.

(05-06-2019 01:08 PM)q5sys Wrote:  

(05-06-2019 12:51 PM)TripleA Wrote:  a professional IT programmer/analyst

Yes... but are you c/c++ MasterRace or a user of one of those newer hipster languages like ruby/clojure/crystal?

Not me. The one he was calling an internet imbecile works in IT for a living, lol.

(05-06-2019 12:51 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(05-06-2019 12:24 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  If you don't know you can hover over a link and see where it takes you, you just might be an imbecile. It's not name calling when it's factual. Sorry.

If you don't know that different web browsers are programmed differently, and that the link doesn't show in every one, then maybe you are the imbecile.

I'm using Chrome OS. Doesn't show there, genius.

Btw, you're telling a professional IT programmer/analyst that he doesn't know how to use the internet.

Two strikes...

Ah, TripleA providing one of the best beat downs we've seen on this board since the late tigerbluesky got his azz handed to him on a daily basis around here.

(05-06-2019 02:21 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(05-06-2019 02:16 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  O'Keefe must be really getting under Commie Tom's skin lol.

Nice deflection attempt. Well, actually...a horrible one. O'keefe is a complete ******* that does nothing but provide me with the opportunity to laugh at him and those who continue to defend him.

So by all means...keep me laughing!

We are laughing at you imbecile. What a dork.