(10-14-2018 08:57 AM)7 Wrote: (10-14-2018 07:58 AM)bikechuck Wrote: [quote='7' pid='15579041' dateline='1539488723']
My god you people are idiots
7, I always enjoy your analysis though I do not always agree with all of it. Why do you feel that Carey should not have been aggressive closing out the first half? Given the field position, time remaining and favorable wind conditions it seemed like a no brainer to me to try to score in that situation.
I openly questioned the move on twitter. He should have called a timeout. They then proceeded to go 3 and out anyways. It didn't matter.
7, thanks for the response and more, thanks for somewhat agreeing as you questioned the move on twitter.
But---it did matter. Getting the ball at midfield with 1:05 AND two timeouts, you have much more at your disposal from your playbook than you have with 27 seconds left. Ok, it didn't matter, we won we are 4-0....with that I might as well take my wife to mall on a Saturday afternoon (or Wednesday night) and come home and look at the bottom line on ESPN to see the final score.
We all have the right to question coaches and that is why I posted the thread to begin with---I don't know as much as they do---and was (am still) searching for a sound football reason not to call time out in that situation.
If we were receiving the ball in the second half instead of kicking---good answer, but that wasn't the case.
If someone says that our punt returner hasn't dropped a punt all season and is due to drop one and have Ohio recover and you don't want them to have time----not a good answer.
Don't want to beat the dead horse as we won and you did question the call....I just don't get it. (and at some point we won't win a game like this)