https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1...1673174016

ROPE-A-DOPE

(07-17-2018 11:24 AM)green Wrote:  

https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1...1673174016

ROPE-A-DOPE

I can't read minds, but I think the answer is "no" to her question of whether or not the DNC servers have been made avaiable to the FBI.

LOL, of course they never turned it over.

They had copies..... exact same thing.

(07-17-2018 12:17 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  They had copies..... exact same thing.

But how do they PROVE that the copies are the exact same thing?

I get that it is certainly possible to prove that they COULD HAVE made a true and faithful and exact copy. But that doesn't prove that they DID do so. How do you prove that they DID do so?

He specifically said this was "an act of war."

Does anybody on here agree that this qualifies as an act of war?

Anybody?


1:20 mark

Quote:And they did this so they could attempt to swing our elections. That is an act of war. And if we had a Democrat in the White House right now we would have a cabinet that's dealing with this.
- Tom Perez, Chairman, DNC

(07-17-2018 12:17 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  They had copies..... exact same thing.

yet, the dnc chair, who ought to know, stumbled, fumbled, mumbled ...

POINT-BLANK

(07-17-2018 12:29 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  He specifically said this was "an act of war."

Does anybody on here agree that this qualifies as an act of war?

Anybody?

H wants the USA to declare war on Russia? First target futbol stadiums?

(07-17-2018 12:18 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(07-17-2018 12:17 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  They had copies..... exact same thing.

But how do they PROVE that the copies are the exact same thing?

I get that it is certainly possible to prove that they COULD HAVE made a true and faithful and exact copy. But that doesn't prove that they DID do so. How do you prove that they DID do so?

One would think that if they were true and exact copies there wouldn't be any earthly reason not to turn them over to the FBI to look at again..................now, if there were some things on there that weren't part of the copy - well, I guess they wouldn't want that to come to light or maybe it's the hidden info they don't want getting out............

Just thinking logically here.....

(07-17-2018 12:29 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  He specifically said this was "an act of war."

Does anybody on here agree that this qualifies as an act of war?

Anybody?

WHO DIED AND MADE YOU BOSS

(07-17-2018 12:29 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  He specifically said this was "an act of war."

Does anybody on here agree that this qualifies as an act of war?

Anybody?

Nope. Wasn't even hacking of a government owned server - just hacking of a private entity server that hackers do all the time - unless hackers world wide are committing acts of war every day..

But 140 of them. The size of aardvarks. How can we deal with it?

(07-17-2018 12:29 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  He specifically said this was "an act of war."

Does anybody on here agree that this qualifies as an act of war?

Anybody?

I guess hacking Chase Bank (another private group) would also be an act of war in his mind.

Interesting how these folks seem to conflate hacking 'private servers of the Democratic Party' with an attack on 'the United States'.

Hmmm.... I also guess if some wetback trespasses on a ranch I have an interest in in South Texas, that would *also* be an equivalent act of war in that worldview.

(07-17-2018 12:17 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  They had copies..... exact same thing.

If a copy is the exact same thing, then why not just hand over the original and remove all doubt?

(07-17-2018 12:38 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(07-17-2018 12:17 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  They had copies..... exact same thing.

If a copy is the exact same thing, then why not just hand over the original and remove all doubt?

Glad to know all my $100 bill copies are the 'exact same thing.' Im rich!!!!

(07-17-2018 12:35 PM)Crebman Wrote:  

(07-17-2018 12:29 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  He specifically said this was "an act of war."

Does anybody on here agree that this qualifies as an act of war?

Anybody?

Nope. Wasn't even hacking of a government owned server - just hacking of a private entity server that hackers do all the time - unless hackers world wide are committing acts of war every day..

And by logical extension... if he thinks the hacking is an act of war and Democrats think it's an act of war, why did they take federal mandate security policies so lightly? Doesn't that increase their level of culpability?

They're trying to tell us this is a REALLY BIG DEAL. Then why didn't THEY treat is as such?

(07-17-2018 12:36 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(07-17-2018 12:29 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  He specifically said this was "an act of war."

Does anybody on here agree that this qualifies as an act of war?

Anybody?

I guess hacking Chase Bank (another private group) would also be an act of war in his mind.

Interesting how these folks seem to conflate hacking 'private servers of the Democratic Party' with an attack on 'the United States'.

Hmmm.... I also guess if some wetback trespasses on a ranch I have an interest in in South Texas, that would *also* be an equivalent act of war in that worldview.

Pearls before swine. I've said it over and over.

What a slimy weasel.

Ask (fired) Director Comey!

AGAIN, ASK DIRECTOR COMEY!!!

Aaaaaaaauuuugggghhhhhhh!!!!

What a tool

(07-17-2018 12:36 PM)shere khan Wrote:  But 140 of them. The size of aardvarks. How can we deal with it?

(07-17-2018 12:29 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  He specifically said this was "an act of war."

Does anybody on here agree that this qualifies as an act of war?

Anybody?


1:20 mark

Quote:And they did this so they could attempt to swing our elections. That is an act of war. And if we had a Democrat in the White House right now we would have a cabinet that's dealing with this.
- Tom Perez, Chairman, DNC

1. Democrat claims act of war
2. President attacks Russia
3. Democrats deride President as a warmonger