Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
House Intel Committee: 'No Evidence' of Trump-Russia Collusion
Author Message
Machiavelli Offline
Back to Reality. Oh there goes Gravity

Posts: 25,357
Joined: Apr 2006
I Root For: BGSU
Location:
Post: #21
RE: House Intel Committee: 'No Evidence' of Trump-Russia Collusion
Holy **** it’s linked!!!1!1

Read the executive branch paragraph. Those are Gowdy’s words. Some of you can be incredibly frustrating. WKUYG....... READ!!!! Comprehend!11111
04-27-2018 08:55 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WKUYG Away
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,194
Joined: Oct 2012
Reputation: 1653
I Root For: WKU
Location:
Post: #22
RE: House Intel Committee: 'No Evidence' of Trump-Russia Collusion
(04-27-2018 08:52 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Do you think Trey Gowdy is on the left? He could not be more crystal clear. Trust nothing that comes from him. He’s running interference not an investigation. Of that I am sure.

I don't care if he's so far right he cant turn left what you posted had nothing to do with what was asked of you. The question was very clear...clear enough a school teacher could even understand.

show a like to the following statement you made


"Trey Gowdy even said don’t trust anything out of the house"
04-27-2018 08:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Machiavelli Offline
Back to Reality. Oh there goes Gravity

Posts: 25,357
Joined: Apr 2006
I Root For: BGSU
Location:
Post: #23
RE: House Intel Committee: 'No Evidence' of Trump-Russia Collusion
(04-27-2018 08:51 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  
(04-27-2018 08:37 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Tech, this took me about 30 minutes to find this. I do appreciate when people provide links and I also went out of my way to find a source you would trust. Without further ado.... I give you Fox News.....

But executive branch investigations have more credibility, they have more tools, and that's what I think my fellow citizens ought to be waiting for and have confidence in, not congressional investigations that are run by guys running for the Senate in California who has never met a camera that they didn't fall in love with. That's what you should not have confidence in.



I thought this was pretty damning evidence that Nunes is full of ****.


http://www.foxnews.com/transcript/2018/0...-down.html

Maybe you didn't understand the question asked of you so let me give it to you again...

When did Trey Gowdy even said don’t trust anything out of the house?

The link had nothing to do with the question. NO WHERE in that piece did Trey Gowdy said don’t trust anything out of the house.

NOTHING...nothing close.
04-27-2018 08:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Machiavelli Offline
Back to Reality. Oh there goes Gravity

Posts: 25,357
Joined: Apr 2006
I Root For: BGSU
Location:
Post: #24
RE: House Intel Committee: 'No Evidence' of Trump-Russia Collusion
I am actually trying...........

Lord knows I am trying.........
04-27-2018 08:58 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WKUYG Away
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,194
Joined: Oct 2012
Reputation: 1653
I Root For: WKU
Location:
Post: #25
RE: House Intel Committee: 'No Evidence' of Trump-Russia Collusion
(04-27-2018 08:55 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Holy **** it’s linked!!!1!1

Read the executive branch paragraph. Those are Gowdy’s words. Some of you can be incredibly frustrating. WKUYG....... READ!!!! Comprehend!11111

No this time you try reading and comprehending what was asked of you.

below is the post..let me help you since you cant comprehend this. He's asking for a link that shows where Gowdy said the part in bold. You link never comes close to answering that question,. It was nothing about that.

(04-27-2018 05:41 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  
(04-27-2018 04:35 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  For me things changed when Mueller said a lot of what we read in the news is not true. That’s a game changer on both sides I would think. Maybe not. It does for me.

Trey Gowdy even said don’t trust anything out of the house but to each his own.

Linky please. And no, I'm not Michael Cohen so don't ask me to find support for your assertion.
(This post was last modified: 04-27-2018 09:02 PM by WKUYG.)
04-27-2018 08:58 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Machiavelli Offline
Back to Reality. Oh there goes Gravity

Posts: 25,357
Joined: Apr 2006
I Root For: BGSU
Location:
Post: #26
RE: House Intel Committee: 'No Evidence' of Trump-Russia Collusion
WKUYG


Are you trolling or just failing to comprehend. Go back into my link read the surrounding. Paragraphs around what I highlighted. That’s exactly what a Gowdy is saying.
04-27-2018 09:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Machiavelli Offline
Back to Reality. Oh there goes Gravity

Posts: 25,357
Joined: Apr 2006
I Root For: BGSU
Location:
Post: #27
RE: House Intel Committee: 'No Evidence' of Trump-Russia Collusion
Wait for the executive branch investigation.... not the congressional.

I paraphrased yes. I actually remembered hearing this live on tv. It was especially damaging I thought. Can someone on the right clarify this..... WKUYG obviously doesn’t take this from me. You can’t possibly interpret his words any other way.
(This post was last modified: 04-27-2018 09:04 PM by Machiavelli.)
04-27-2018 09:03 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Machiavelli Offline
Back to Reality. Oh there goes Gravity

Posts: 25,357
Joined: Apr 2006
I Root For: BGSU
Location:
Post: #28
RE: House Intel Committee: 'No Evidence' of Trump-Russia Collusion
That’s what you should not have confidence in..........

Tell me WKUYG..... what is your interpretation of that sentence.

I’ll hang up and wait for a response.
04-27-2018 09:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WKUYG Away
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,194
Joined: Oct 2012
Reputation: 1653
I Root For: WKU
Location:
Post: #29
RE: House Intel Committee: 'No Evidence' of Trump-Russia Collusion
(04-27-2018 09:00 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  WKUYG


Are you trolling or just failing to comprehend. Go back into my link read the surrounding. Paragraphs around what I highlighted. That’s exactly what a Gowdy is saying.

Honestly are you really teaching children at school? If so I'm really worried for them.


NO ONE ASKED YOU ABOUT THE executive branch. That was not the question. Do you not see or understand the question that was asked of you to give a link to?

That interview had nothing to do with that question. Hell it wasn't even in the same neighborhood .

I'm finished with you on this because I can't believe a teacher does not understand a simple question
04-27-2018 09:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Machiavelli Offline
Back to Reality. Oh there goes Gravity

Posts: 25,357
Joined: Apr 2006
I Root For: BGSU
Location:
Post: #30
RE: House Intel Committee: 'No Evidence' of Trump-Russia Collusion
That’s exactly what Gowdy is saying. Do not have faith in congressional investigations.

You sir are the perfect Trump voter.

MAGA
04-27-2018 09:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WKUYG Away
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,194
Joined: Oct 2012
Reputation: 1653
I Root For: WKU
Location:
Post: #31
RE: House Intel Committee: 'No Evidence' of Trump-Russia Collusion
(04-27-2018 09:03 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Wait for the executive branch investigation.... not the congressional.

I paraphrased yes. I actually remembered hearing this live on tv. It was especially damaging I thought. Can someone on the right clarify this..... WKUYG obviously doesn’t take this from me. You can’t possibly interpret his words any other way.



That is the point you want to make......

it wasn't the question Tech asked you for a link to. You just went off in left field on something no one asked you about.

I really am finished this time because you're driving me crazy to think about a person that can't understand a question asked of them.

I understand you want to make a totally different point of view.
04-27-2018 09:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Machiavelli Offline
Back to Reality. Oh there goes Gravity

Posts: 25,357
Joined: Apr 2006
I Root For: BGSU
Location:
Post: #32
RE: House Intel Committee: 'No Evidence' of Trump-Russia Collusion
Tech asked me for the link where Gowdy said not to trust anything out of the house.

I gave you the exact paragraph I paraphrased. Instead of trust he used do not have confidence in. My sentence was from memory. I gave the actual quote. I paraphrased of course but any rational human being in my opinion would agree with my assertion.
(This post was last modified: 04-27-2018 09:15 PM by Machiavelli.)
04-27-2018 09:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WKUYG Away
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,194
Joined: Oct 2012
Reputation: 1653
I Root For: WKU
Location:
Post: #33
RE: House Intel Committee: 'No Evidence' of Trump-Russia Collusion
Below is every word Gowdy said

Now point out where he said..... DONT TRUST ANYTHING COMING FROM THE HOUSE. If you can't do that point out what you believe your memory saw?

GOWDY: Well, I hope that's not what's happening. This is the same Bob Mueller that just indicted a dozen Russians for interfering with our election in 2016. My advice to the president is the same thing I just told his lawyer. Give Bob Mueller the time, the independence, and the resources to do the very job -- keep in mind, Chris, he didn't volunteer for this.

He didn't start waving his hand and say pick me. A Trump nominated Rod Rosenstein is who picked Bob Mueller. So, give him the time, the resources to do his job. When you are innocent, if the allegations of collusion with the Russians and there's no evidence of that and you are innocent of that, act like it.


GOWDY: Well, I’m not sure the House can do a lot. We don't have advice and consent. I think the president is going to have a really difficult time nominating and having approved another attorney general. It's going to be -- I would just counsel the president, it's going to be very, very long bad 2018. And it's going to be distracting from other things that he wants to do and was elected to do.

Let it play out its course. If you've done nothing wrong, you should want the investigation to be as wholesome and thorough as possible


GOWDY: Oh, Andy McCabe has undercut his credibility all by himself. He didn't need any help doing that. And I find it richly ironic that he is lamenting that those are attacking the FBI when he himself does the exact same thing.

It was the FBI who said he made an unauthorized disclosure and then lied about it. That wasn't President Trump. It wasn't me. It wasn't a crazy House Republicans. It was his own fell FBI agents that said he leaked and then lied about it. So, if he's got credibility issues, he needs look no further than himself.

GOWDY: Yes, that's right. I mean, if you look at his statement, he was really upset that he is being blamed for ending something. And the interesting part of his statement, which I’ve heard a lot of people talk about is that he was really blaming DOJ, the Department of Justice who shut down the investigation.

But you know what, Chris? We don't live in a relativistic world and you don't get to pick and choose which rules to abide by and you don't get to decide when to tell the truth and what not to. I’m going to withhold judgment until Horowitz’s report comes out.
GOWDY: Right. Who, you know, two weeks ago, the president was criticizing and now, all of a sudden, McCabe is criticizing. So, he is probably doing his job because everyone is criticizing him.

Let's wait and see what he found. Let's wait and see what that lack of candor was. And then we can judge the fact pattern and the proportionality of the penalty of his losing his pension. We can judge all that once we understand exactly what he is alleged to have done.

But make no mistake, the FBI who recommended that he’d be fired. It wasn’t crazy House Republicans and it wasn't the Trump administration. It was one of his own fellow bureau agents.

GOWDY: Well, the basis for the conclusion, case closed on no evidence of collusion is that we interviewed north of 70 witnesses. And, Chris, I personally have as every one of them, give me any bit of evidence you have, regardless of whether you believe it and regardless of the source, that President Trump colluded, conspired, coordinated with the Russians. And not a single witness from Susan Rice, to Ben Rhodes to Donald Trump Jr., to Jared Kushner, no one has any evidence, I mean, folks who were sympathetic to the president and folks who are antagonistic to the president, not one scintilla of evidence, of coordination, collusion, conspiracy between Trump and his campaign and the Russians.

So, I can't tell you what I don't know. I can just tell you I asked every single witness, and every single witness, including former Obama administration officials, had no evidence of collusion.

GOWDY: Well, we can't talk to them. They are all under indictment or pled guilty, which is why I say there is no evidence. I can't tell you what four people I haven't talked to are going to say, but, Chris, I can't talk to them. They have a Fifth Amendment right not to talk to Congress. I mean, Steve Bannon is not under indictment and he didn't talk to Congress.

So, there’s lots of things to blame Congress for, but us not knowing what people who won't talk to us or say should not be one of them. I don't know what Mueller has found. I’ve been really very clear, leave him alone (ph). Let him do his job.

I can tell you with the universe of folks that we’ve interviewed, there is no evidence of collusion. That's the best I can do. I can't tell you what people I haven't talked to would say.


GOWDY: Well, that's why I always say, based on the evidence. You don't know what you don't know, and you don't know what witnesses you haven't talked to or documents you haven't seen you. Look, I’m disappointed that Steven Bannon would sit there and be interviewed by a salacious book author but he wouldn’t answer our questions. I’m frustrated by that.

But executive branch investigations have more credibility, they have more tools, and that's what I think my fellow citizens ought to be waiting for and have confidence in, not congressional investigations that are run by guys running for the Senate in California who has never met a camera that they didn't fall in love with. That's what you should not have confidence in.

Have confidence in the executive branch investigations. And if Mueller find stuff, more power to him, but the best I can do is interview the people in front of me and ask all relevant questions and no one has said there was -- no one has said that there was collusion.


GOWDY: I think he's done a hell of a lot better job than President Obama did. It wasn't Donald Trump who laughed when that Romney said Russia was our number one geopolitical enemy. It wasn't President Trump who handed that awkward reset button to the Russians. And it wasn't President Trump who said on a hot mike, I’ll have more flexibility in the second term.

All of that was President Obama. So, this country can't be tough enough on Russia. They tried to interfere with the fundamentals of our democracy. I mean, their war is not against Democrats or Republicans, it's against Americans. So, you cannot be tough enough against Russia.

In my judgment, I hope he does more, but he did a hell of a lot more than his predecessor did.
(This post was last modified: 04-27-2018 09:31 PM by WKUYG.)
04-27-2018 09:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Machiavelli Offline
Back to Reality. Oh there goes Gravity

Posts: 25,357
Joined: Apr 2006
I Root For: BGSU
Location:
Post: #34
RE: House Intel Committee: 'No Evidence' of Trump-Russia Collusion
Five paragraphs up........ this isn’t rocket science
04-27-2018 09:24 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Owl 69/70/75 Online
Just an old rugby coach
*

Posts: 80,843
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3211
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

DonatorsNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #35
RE: House Intel Committee: 'No Evidence' of Trump-Russia Collusion
(04-27-2018 09:24 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Five paragraphs up........ this isn’t rocket science

I would presume you mean the paragraph that starts, "But executive branch investigations..."

That paragraph doesn't say what you mischaracterized it as saying.
04-27-2018 09:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WKUYG Away
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,194
Joined: Oct 2012
Reputation: 1653
I Root For: WKU
Location:
Post: #36
RE: House Intel Committee: 'No Evidence' of Trump-Russia Collusion
(04-27-2018 09:24 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Five paragraphs up........ this isn’t rocket science

What he's saying is to have more confidence in the branch that has the power of law on its side over congress in a investigation

That doesn't say believe NOTHING coming from the house. But I do understand in "your mind" how you would mistake the two.

For I believe what is the fourth (and finial) time I'm done
(This post was last modified: 04-27-2018 09:39 PM by WKUYG.)
04-27-2018 09:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ODUsmitty Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,161
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 1657
I Root For: Old Dominion
Location:
Post: #37
RE: House Intel Committee: 'No Evidence' of Trump-Russia Collusion
I will apologize in advance, but Mach, you are an absolute partisan imbecile. The twisted logic you use to infer the meaning you desire is not valid nor auditable. I used to think you were a poster with whom I disagreed that i felt would be interesting with which to share a beer and debate politics, but you have consistently proven yourself to be nothing but a liberal partisan hack of no value to this board. Good riddance.
04-27-2018 09:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Machiavelli Offline
Back to Reality. Oh there goes Gravity

Posts: 25,357
Joined: Apr 2006
I Root For: BGSU
Location:
Post: #38
RE: House Intel Committee: 'No Evidence' of Trump-Russia Collusion
Wow. He is protecting Mueller’s investigation and telling you not to have confidence in congressional investigations.........

It doesn’t get clearer than that boys......it doesn’t........
04-27-2018 09:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Machiavelli Offline
Back to Reality. Oh there goes Gravity

Posts: 25,357
Joined: Apr 2006
I Root For: BGSU
Location:
Post: #39
RE: House Intel Committee: 'No Evidence' of Trump-Russia Collusion
(04-27-2018 09:42 PM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  I will apologize in advance, but Mach, you are an absolute partisan imbecile. The twisted logic you use to infer the meaning you desire is not valid nor auditable. I used to think you were a poster with whom I disagreed that i felt would be interesting with which to share a beer and debate politics, but you have consistently proven yourself to be nothing but a liberal partisan hack of no value to this board. Good riddance.

This is TRULY a bizzaro world. I watched this interview live on tv. I know exactly how it was meant and how it was taken.

I am honestly shocked that there is any other interpretation. Shocked.


It’s in black and white.... what do you think he is saying?
04-27-2018 09:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Owl 69/70/75 Online
Just an old rugby coach
*

Posts: 80,843
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3211
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

DonatorsNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #40
RE: House Intel Committee: 'No Evidence' of Trump-Russia Collusion
(04-27-2018 09:42 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Wow. He is protecting Mueller’s investigation and telling you not to have confidence in congressional investigations.........
It doesn’t get clearer than that boys......it doesn’t........

Actually, he is expressing a thought that I have long felt and have expressed a few times on here--congressional hearings are more dog and pony show than evidentiary proceedings. To leap from there to you can't trust anything coming out of the house is a bit beyond the pale, however.

Why don't you just focus on what he actually said?
04-27-2018 09:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.