Quote:“Given the Department’s ongoing delays in producing these documents, I am left with no choice but to issue the enclosed subpoena to compel production of these documents,” Goodlatte wrote in a letter to DOJ.

The new subpoena from Goodlatte encompasses thousands of records gathered by Inspector General Michael Horowitz in his investigation of the FBI's handling of the 2016 investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server. But Goodlatte said he views the recent firing of McCabe as an extension of the initial request, since McCabe's firing was connected to his role in the Clinton probe.

“I cannot think of a good plausible explanation for why we would have received so few documents over a five-month period, even given the importance and scrutiny to which all the documents should receive for redaction of sensitive potential national security information,” said Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas).

New York Rep. Jerry Nadler, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, blasted Goodlatte’s move as an attempt to “pivot the discussion back to Hillary Clinton and divert attention from the chaos surrounding the Trump Administration and allegations involving the Trump campaign.”

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/03/2...ing-481505

Buckle up?

(03-22-2018 06:26 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

Quote:“Given the Department’s ongoing delays in producing these documents, I am left with no choice but to issue the enclosed subpoena to compel production of these documents,” Goodlatte wrote in a letter to DOJ.

The new subpoena from Goodlatte encompasses thousands of records gathered by Inspector General Michael Horowitz in his investigation of the FBI's handling of the 2016 investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server. But Goodlatte said he views the recent firing of McCabe as an extension of the initial request, since McCabe's firing was connected to his role in the Clinton probe.

“I cannot think of a good plausible explanation for why we would have received so few documents over a five-month period, even given the importance and scrutiny to which all the documents should receive for redaction of sensitive potential national security information,” said Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas).

New York Rep. Jerry Nadler, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, blasted Goodlatte’s move as an attempt to “pivot the discussion back to Hillary Clinton and divert attention from the chaos surrounding the Trump Administration and allegations involving the Trump campaign.”

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/03/2...ing-481505

Buckle up?

I'm more of a sit back, relax and enjoy the show kind of guy.

be careful what you ask for dumocrats

(03-22-2018 06:26 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

Quote:“Given the Department’s ongoing delays in producing these documents, I am left with no choice but to issue the enclosed subpoena to compel production of these documents,” Goodlatte wrote in a letter to DOJ.

The new subpoena from Goodlatte encompasses thousands of records gathered by Inspector General Michael Horowitz in his investigation of the FBI's handling of the 2016 investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server. But Goodlatte said he views the recent firing of McCabe as an extension of the initial request, since McCabe's firing was connected to his role in the Clinton probe.

“I cannot think of a good plausible explanation for why we would have received so few documents over a five-month period, even given the importance and scrutiny to which all the documents should receive for redaction of sensitive potential national security information,” said Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas).

New York Rep. Jerry Nadler, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, blasted Goodlatte’s move as an attempt to “pivot the discussion back to Hillary Clinton and divert attention from the chaos surrounding the Trump Administration and allegations involving the Trump campaign.”

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/03/2...ing-481505

Buckle up?

"New York Rep. Jerry Nadler, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, blasted Goodlatte’s move as an attempt to “pivot the discussion back to Hillary Clinton and divert attention from the chaos surrounding the Trump Administration and allegations involving the Trump campaign.”


...and that is the straw that will break the camels back. Is it any wonder that the Demons are acutely against this move? I can't wait. But, I have no choice.