(03-20-2018 03:05 PM)SadderBudweiser Wrote:  

(03-20-2018 02:58 PM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  ECU is a bit of an unknown for next year. A lot depends on the coach that we hire. I am still hoping it is going to be Joe Dooley. If we are able to land him, I think anything is possible.

A lot also hinges on whether or not the new coach allows Kentrell Barkley to rejoin the team - or if he even WANTS to.

We have some good talent on the roster, but not enough to contend for a top-half finish in the American, in my opinion.

Our backcourt has the potential to be a top 2-3 backcourt in the American next year. Hear me out... don't laugh too hard yet. Our starting duo at Guard will be:

PG - Jeremy Sheppard: Sat out last season due to violation of team rules.
However, as a true freshman a year earlier, he made the AAC All-Rookie team. He led the AAC in Assists per Game & Assist/Turnover Ratio. Averaged almost 10 points per game in 26 minutes.

SG - Shawn Williams: 2017-2018 AAC Rookie of the Year.

That is an awesome 1-2 punch, in my opinion. The best PG/SG combo we have seen in a long time in Greenville.

Outside of that, on the roster today, it is a crapshoot.

SF/PF - Seth LeDay (brother of former VT star Zach LeDay) will be eligible after transferring from Virginia Tech. He's 6'7", athletic as hell, and we're excited to see what he can bring to the table.

We are bringing in 4 freshmen... 2 of which I am excited about.

Jayden Gardner - 6'7" 235lbs Put up HUGE numbers for his HS team in 4-A (Highest level in NC). Double double machine. He's a banger we haven't had in a long time.


Mike Wynn - 6'7" 200lbs A scoring machine in HS. 6'7" swingman with range and the ability to get to the basket.


We're also bringing in a SG from Charlottesville, VA and a 7-footer from Tennessee. Don't know much about those 2.

We could finish last... but I don't see it, honestly.

Well you’re definitely a pre-season pick for Best Hair.

Haha... that's not even all of it...

(03-20-2018 03:19 PM)SadderBudweiser Wrote:  

(03-20-2018 03:08 PM)JFlight21 Wrote:  

(03-20-2018 10:16 AM)SadderBudweiser Wrote:  

(03-20-2018 08:44 AM)Billy Bob Bearcat Wrote:  

(03-20-2018 07:36 AM)Newton card Wrote:  Cane broom is awful at point!!

You must be related to Justin Jennifer.

He stinks too. Your best performance times against Nevada were with BOTH f them on the bench. Cumberland and Evans ran things just fine.

Broome was by far UC's best player @ Xavier, against Florida and home against Wichita State. I think Mick handled him terribly this year but hopefully he knows that without Evans (likely), Clark and Washington that he'll need Broome's offensive punch.

Your team went 31-5 and Broome was your best player in three of the losses? That’s it? Thanks but pass.

I literally have no idea what point you are trying to make here....

Broome was clearly UC's best offensive player in 3 of UC's toughest games this season. He flashed great scoring potential multiple times while also being wildly inconsistent, which can happen as the 5th option on a great team while adjusting to a new level of competition. With all of UC's departures he would be the guy I would expect to make the leap. Not sure how difficult that is to comprehend...

(03-20-2018 03:38 PM)JFlight21 Wrote:  

(03-20-2018 03:21 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(03-20-2018 02:42 PM)JFlight21 Wrote:  It really depends on which guys stay and leave to state the obvious. At this time last year the SMU guys were confident Semi would be back. Right now UC fans think Evans is gone. If Evans returns, I think UC is the favorite again. I would argue that Cumberland is the best returning player outside of the NBA possibilities (Evans, Shamet, Shake), so returning Evans as well would give UC a great duo to work with.

lets not be homer
jalen adams??? bj taylor??? quinton rose?? everyone is taking those 3 over cumberland...

Maybe. I certainly wouldn't take Adams or Rose over Cumberland. I think Taylor has definitely has an argument though.

Cumberland didn't get as much exposure as those three as he was often the 3rd or 4th option offensively. But I think it was pretty clear by the end of the year (and this has been echoed by many on the UC boards) that Cumberland was UC's most talented offensive player. Cronin also compares him to Kilpatrick. It's not like Cumberland was some scrub out of high school, he was a consensus top 50 guy. I think he'll be a monster next year as the offensive focus.

its not even close to me..cumberland is slower and not as agile or shifty
jalen adams is special..every single game we played this year we shutdown every single guard we played when it was one on one..except jalen adams

even shamet, shamet was only scoring on houston with picks to get him open, or trying to lose the defender by scrambling around when the ball wasnt in his hands...the only player to step toe to toe with our guards, one on one and get the shots he wanted wanted was adams

if a defense specifically always put there best defender on cumberland and he had to carry a team, do you still see him scoring on the good defensive teams? i dont

adams would have been a lottery pick had he gone to any other powerhouse a year or 2 ago....he is faster, quicker longer, longer ..

quinton rose is a 6'8 point guard..a 6'8 point guard

(03-20-2018 04:15 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(03-20-2018 03:38 PM)JFlight21 Wrote:  

(03-20-2018 03:21 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(03-20-2018 02:42 PM)JFlight21 Wrote:  It really depends on which guys stay and leave to state the obvious. At this time last year the SMU guys were confident Semi would be back. Right now UC fans think Evans is gone. If Evans returns, I think UC is the favorite again. I would argue that Cumberland is the best returning player outside of the NBA possibilities (Evans, Shamet, Shake), so returning Evans as well would give UC a great duo to work with.

lets not be homer
jalen adams??? bj taylor??? quinton rose?? everyone is taking those 3 over cumberland...

Maybe. I certainly wouldn't take Adams or Rose over Cumberland. I think Taylor has definitely has an argument though.

Cumberland didn't get as much exposure as those three as he was often the 3rd or 4th option offensively. But I think it was pretty clear by the end of the year (and this has been echoed by many on the UC boards) that Cumberland was UC's most talented offensive player. Cronin also compares him to Kilpatrick. It's not like Cumberland was some scrub out of high school, he was a consensus top 50 guy. I think he'll be a monster next year as the offensive focus.

its not even close to me..cumberland is slower and not as agile or shifty
jalen adams is special..every single game we played this year we shutdown every single guard we played when it was one on one..except jalen adams

even shamet, shamet was only scoring on houston with picks to get him open, or trying to lose the defender by scrambling around when the ball wasnt in his hands...the only player to step toe to toe with our guards, one on one and get the shots he wanted wanted was adams

if a defense specifically always put there best defender on cumberland and he had to carry a team, do you still see him scoring on the good defensive teams? i dont

adams would have been a lottery pick had he gone to any other powerhouse a year or 2 ago....he is faster, quicker longer, longer ..

quinton rose is a 6'8 point guard..a 6'8 point guard

While I do like Cumberland and think he could very likely be a top 8-10 player in AAC next season, I think the recency bias of him having 1&1/2 REAL good tourney games is creating a little bias. We are saying a guy who averaged 11.5PPG 4RPG 2.5APG on only 40% from field and 34% from 3 (both low and not efficent) is the best returner in the conference? Dont think that is a strong take.

I would take Rose, Adams, or BJ Taylor any day. Those guys have proven it. I am a big Quinton Rose fan, kid could be a real good pro. Pesik and I would have just as good of an argument saying Jarrey Foster or Corey Davis are as good as Cumberland. Check the stats, impact, defense, potential etc. Cumberland is a nice player and will likely have a breakout year next year, but we need to see more to believe/discuss him best player in the conference.

(03-20-2018 04:15 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(03-20-2018 03:38 PM)JFlight21 Wrote:  

(03-20-2018 03:21 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(03-20-2018 02:42 PM)JFlight21 Wrote:  It really depends on which guys stay and leave to state the obvious. At this time last year the SMU guys were confident Semi would be back. Right now UC fans think Evans is gone. If Evans returns, I think UC is the favorite again. I would argue that Cumberland is the best returning player outside of the NBA possibilities (Evans, Shamet, Shake), so returning Evans as well would give UC a great duo to work with.

lets not be homer
jalen adams??? bj taylor??? quinton rose?? everyone is taking those 3 over cumberland...

Maybe. I certainly wouldn't take Adams or Rose over Cumberland. I think Taylor has definitely has an argument though.

Cumberland didn't get as much exposure as those three as he was often the 3rd or 4th option offensively. But I think it was pretty clear by the end of the year (and this has been echoed by many on the UC boards) that Cumberland was UC's most talented offensive player. Cronin also compares him to Kilpatrick. It's not like Cumberland was some scrub out of high school, he was a consensus top 50 guy. I think he'll be a monster next year as the offensive focus.

its not even close to me..cumberland is slower and not as agile or shifty
jalen adams is special..every single game we played this year we shutdown every single guard we played when it was one on one..except jalen adams

even shamet, shamet was only scoring on houston with picks to get him open, or trying to lose the defender by scrambling around when the ball wasnt in his hands...the only player to step toe to toe with our guards, one on one and get the shots he wanted wanted was adams

if a defense specifically always put there best defender on cumberland and he had to carry a team, do you still see him scoring on the good defensive teams? i dont

adams would have been a lottery pick had he gone to any other powerhouse a year or 2 ago....he is faster, quicker longer, longer ..

quinton rose is a 6'8 point guard..a 6'8 point guard

I've said for two years now that Jalen Adams is the most talented player in the league but also the most maddening. I don't disagree with really any of your points about his skill and athleticism, but the fact is his efficiency stinks and he is an atrocious defender. Maybe things would be different if Kelvin Sampson or Mick Cronin was his coach, but I think Cumberland will be a better overall player next year and I'm not just taking scoring ability into account.

Q isn't a PG. He's a 2.

(03-20-2018 05:23 PM)PonyHoopsFan85 Wrote:  

(03-20-2018 04:15 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(03-20-2018 03:38 PM)JFlight21 Wrote:  

(03-20-2018 03:21 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(03-20-2018 02:42 PM)JFlight21 Wrote:  It really depends on which guys stay and leave to state the obvious. At this time last year the SMU guys were confident Semi would be back. Right now UC fans think Evans is gone. If Evans returns, I think UC is the favorite again. I would argue that Cumberland is the best returning player outside of the NBA possibilities (Evans, Shamet, Shake), so returning Evans as well would give UC a great duo to work with.

lets not be homer
jalen adams??? bj taylor??? quinton rose?? everyone is taking those 3 over cumberland...

Maybe. I certainly wouldn't take Adams or Rose over Cumberland. I think Taylor has definitely has an argument though.

Cumberland didn't get as much exposure as those three as he was often the 3rd or 4th option offensively. But I think it was pretty clear by the end of the year (and this has been echoed by many on the UC boards) that Cumberland was UC's most talented offensive player. Cronin also compares him to Kilpatrick. It's not like Cumberland was some scrub out of high school, he was a consensus top 50 guy. I think he'll be a monster next year as the offensive focus.

its not even close to me..cumberland is slower and not as agile or shifty
jalen adams is special..every single game we played this year we shutdown every single guard we played when it was one on one..except jalen adams

even shamet, shamet was only scoring on houston with picks to get him open, or trying to lose the defender by scrambling around when the ball wasnt in his hands...the only player to step toe to toe with our guards, one on one and get the shots he wanted wanted was adams

if a defense specifically always put there best defender on cumberland and he had to carry a team, do you still see him scoring on the good defensive teams? i dont

adams would have been a lottery pick had he gone to any other powerhouse a year or 2 ago....he is faster, quicker longer, longer ..

quinton rose is a 6'8 point guard..a 6'8 point guard

While I do like Cumberland and think he could very likely be a top 8-10 player in AAC next season, I think the recency bias of him having 1&1/2 REAL good tourney games is creating a little bias. We are saying a guy who averaged 11.5PPG 4RPG 2.5APG on only 40% from field and 34% from 3 (both low and not efficent) is the best returner in the conference? Dont think that is a strong take.

I would take Rose, Adams, or BJ Taylor any day. Those guys have proven it. I am a big Quinton Rose fan, kid could be a real good pro. Pesik and I would have just as good of an argument saying Jarrey Foster or Corey Davis are as good as Cumberland. Check the stats, impact, defense, potential etc. Cumberland is a nice player and will likely have a breakout year next year, but we need to see more to believe/discuss him best player in the conference.

Totally fair. I don't necessarily disagree with anything you've posted, I'm just stating my (very high) opinion of Cumberland. He has been in the shadows of Caupain, Evans, Clark, etc the past two years but from watching him play every game I think he is the most talented offensive player UC (and highest ranked recruit) UC has had since Lance Stephenson. And Cumberland is a damn good defender too.

(03-20-2018 11:15 AM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  

(03-20-2018 10:34 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(03-20-2018 01:24 AM)cbhstiger Wrote:  TBD

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

LOL. Ain't that the truth? I think it's safe to say if we finished 5th this season, maybe we could creep a little higher with all the starters returning, plus a few new recruits.

depends on the schedule. Our AAC schedule was easy this season.

The worst it can be is 2-3 games harder. One more with Wichita and Houston, maybe SMU. We had 2 with UC and 2 with Tulsa and 2 with UCF. We're not going to have 2 with ALL those teams, lol. Even so, it would be 3 harder games, at worst.

But don't forget, we also lost a game to USF and another to ECU, so to me it's going to be about the same, if they make it as hard as possible.

(03-19-2018 05:58 PM)Wheatshock Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 05:26 PM)SadderBudweiser Wrote:  I think you have to add Fall to the “probably leaving” group. If not I like UCF to battle it out with Houston.

As for the Mustangs: too many questions right now.

Shake or no?
Can Foster play at the level he was after a second knee surgery?
Who will get the ball at crunch time if not those two?
Is I Mike as good as we want to think?
William Douglas: Bueller.... Bueller....
Whitt and McMurray are good pieces but would be even better off the bench behind
Any five including Shake, Jarrey, Mitchell, Ramey, Chargois, Mike. Like I said.... a lot of ifs here. Stay tuned.

We will definitely finish ahead of Hitachi’s second string.

When does SMU get rid of the scholarship restrictions? Aren't you limited to 10 for right now?

Fall has already said he is returning to UCF, which makes sense. He only played part of the season (and was hurt every game he played) so he did not have an opportunity to demonstrate any improvement to the NBA.

(03-20-2018 03:17 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(03-20-2018 02:10 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  Temple finished 9th last year. Cincy the 2 team last year is their travel partner. So if there were no travel groupings Temple would have played the #12 team 2x (USF) however that second game was swapped with Cincy as two paired teams. USF's missed game is moved to UCF because they are travel partners which is why UCF and Houston only played once.

If they aren't using past standings as the basis then explain why Houston, who was picked 9th preseason, had so many home and homes with the top 5?

If you think they are just willy nilly going around throwing together any kind of scheduling then you really don't know much about college athletics.

The travel pairs give them flexibility like dropping USF off for Cincy with Temple. That's where they try and guess to set up better matches.

The matches are based geographically for travel and rivalry considerations. Memphis could have been matched to Cincinnati, Wichita, Tulsa, SMU, or Tulane. They chose Tulane because Memphis was expected to be down. Cincy was given Temple because Temple was suppose to be up. Wichita will always be paired with Tulsa, USF will always be paired with UCF because of rivalry. Work out from there and it's easy to see the pattern.

Texas schools, Florida schools, two on the mississippi, the only pairing that was hard is the group of UConn, Cincy, Temple, and who ever is left gets ECU.

houston was picked 6th not 9th... and we lucked out..ucf was projected one of the best teams we only got them once....houston finished higher than ucf, ucf got a harder conference schedule

"willy nilly" not willy nilly ...based on projections and tv matchups (big names/rivalries)

you assume i dont know much about college athletics when all your statements make me question if you do..
getting many teams is huge for the league money wise and perception wise...ou are arguing that they arent strategic with the scheduling and are using some arbitrary formula based on last years finish..thats blind to think that..

lets not debate this, im 100% sure ucf will get a harder schedule than tulsa..we can revisit this when the schedule is released

As opposed to basing a schedule on media/coaches predictions done right before the season? Considering the schedule is made a good deal before that. Who is clueless here?

Last year's performance is as good as any other predictor for a future team since injury, discipline problems, and teams just underperforming happen all the time.




UCF will struggle to have a harder schedule than Tulsa simply because UCF will always have 2 games vs USF and we will always have 2 vs WSU.


2018-2019 Schedule:


Cincy will play Houston, Tulsa, Wichita, and Temple for sure. Then they should also have SMU, USF and UConn. They will get Tulane, Memphis, SMU, and UCF once.

Wichita will play Tulsa, Cincy, and Houston twice. They should have home and homes with USF, SMU, Tulane, and ECU. They will play UConn, Memphis, Temple, and UCF once.

Houston will have Tulsa, Cincy, Wichita, SMU at home for sure. They should have UCF, Memphis and UConn for home and home as well. They will play ECU, Tulane, USF, and Temple once.

Tulsa will play home and home with Cincy, Houston, and WSU guaranteed, we will most likely have SMU, UCF, Tulane, and Memphis. Tulsa will play Temple, ECU, USF and UConn once

Memphis will play UCF, Temple, SMU and Tulane twice for sure. They should also play Houston, Tulsa and UConn home and home. They will only play Cincy, USF, ECU, and Wichita once.

UCF will play SMU, Memphis, Temple, and USF home and home guaranteed. UCF should have home and homes with Houston, Tulsa, and UConn. They will play ECU, Tulane, Wichita, and Cincy once.

Temple will play Memphis, UCF, SMU, and Cincy two times. They should also play Tulane, ECU, and USF home and home. They will only play Houston, UConn, Tulsa, and Wichita once.

SMU gets Memphis, UCF, Temple, and Houston for sure as home and home. They should also get Tulsa, Wichita, ECU at home. They will play Cincy, USF, Tulane, and UConn once.

UConn gets ECU, USF, Tulane at home for sure. They should also have Houston, Cincy, Memphis, UCF. They will play SMU, Tulsa, Temple and Wichita once.

Tulane will play ECU, USF, UConn, and Memphis home and home. They should also play Tulsa, Temple, and Wichita home and home. They will play Cincy, Houston, SMU, and UCF once.

ECU will play UConn, Tulane, and USF for home and home. They should play Wichita, Cincy, Temple, and SMU for two games. They will play UCF, Tulsa, Houston, and Memphis once.

USF will play UConn, Tulane, ECU, and UCF as home and homes. They should also play Temple, Cincy, and Wichita. They will play Houston, Tulsa, Memphis, and SMU once.



Tulsa will have a slightly harder schedule, but there isn't much difference between 6th and 4th so there shouldn't be in the schedule either.

If you look you won't find any marquee match ups missing. SMU vs UConn/Cincy only once is the worst, Cincy Memphis only once could be another with UConn Wichita being the other possible. The duds are mostly avoided for Cincy and Wichita with Houston probably having the hardest schedule.

(03-20-2018 06:51 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  As opposed to basing a schedule on media/coaches predictions done right before the season? Considering the schedule is made a good deal before that. Who is clueless here?

Last year's performance is as good as any other predictor for a future team since injury, discipline problems, and teams just underperforming happen all the time.


UCF will struggle to have a harder schedule than Tulsa simply because UCF will always have 2 games vs USF and we will always have 2 vs WSU.

i never once said it was based on the coaches or media poll...i said projections...im 100% certain the aac knows how to project its own teams without media poll...
but youve given your projection on the schedule ...we will see in a few months ill bump this thread then

i already see a major flaw in your projection...but will wait to point it out later

Going to take a stab at the ECU starting lineup...

This is assuming Kentrell Barkley is not back on the team next year. I expect that we will go small... we have Usman Haruna (6'11") and Rico Quinton (6'10") on the roster, but Haruna doesn't offer much, and Quinton is going to be a true freshman, so we have no idea what we'll get from him.

PG: Jeremy Sheppard


SG: Shawn Williams


SF: Seth LeDay


PF: Dimitri Spasojevic


PF/C: Jayden Gardner

(03-19-2018 12:02 PM)Doglando Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 11:55 AM)thespiritof1976 Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 11:34 AM)Doglando Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 11:32 AM)BrooklynRocket Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 11:18 AM)Doglando Wrote:  This is absolutely a joke right?? Please please tell me your kidding with this lineup

I think he meant to start Douglas at SG over Dawkins.

Correct i also hear rokas ulvydas will start at point guard over bj

Rokas Ulvydas is a 6-11 PF/C. He will NOT be the starting PG and yet you try to try to call me out ?

Geez. I know you like to try to start stuff with me but you know what ?

It isn't working anymore, friend and to be frankly honest, I don't need people like you trying to rile me up. Not worth it. I'll just put you on ignore and we'll go our separate ways. I actually quite like the back and forth banter here but when you begin to stalk and harass someone only for a reaction, then I've had my fill.

It was a joke because the lineup you put out was absolutely outrageous and those 5 players would never see the court together in a million years. Not a single minute. I promise you

In 3 years together at ucf tacko fall and chad brown have never been on the court at the same time. Both are true centers. Tacko commands the entire paint on both ends of the floor and doesnt allow for any other big to play alongside him. Then you wanna throw in another 6’11” pf/c onto the court at the same time with both of them!!!? Its mindbonggling that someone that has watched even 1 ucf game can come up with such a lineup

I thought the same thing. Is he smoking weed?

C: Tacko
F: Dawkins
G: Griffin
G: DeJesus
G: Taylor

(03-22-2018 10:16 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 12:02 PM)Doglando Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 11:55 AM)thespiritof1976 Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 11:34 AM)Doglando Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 11:32 AM)BrooklynRocket Wrote:  I think he meant to start Douglas at SG over Dawkins.

Correct i also hear rokas ulvydas will start at point guard over bj

Rokas Ulvydas is a 6-11 PF/C. He will NOT be the starting PG and yet you try to try to call me out ?

Geez. I know you like to try to start stuff with me but you know what ?

It isn't working anymore, friend and to be frankly honest, I don't need people like you trying to rile me up. Not worth it. I'll just put you on ignore and we'll go our separate ways. I actually quite like the back and forth banter here but when you begin to stalk and harass someone only for a reaction, then I've had my fill.

It was a joke because the lineup you put out was absolutely outrageous and those 5 players would never see the court together in a million years. Not a single minute. I promise you

In 3 years together at ucf tacko fall and chad brown have never been on the court at the same time. Both are true centers. Tacko commands the entire paint on both ends of the floor and doesnt allow for any other big to play alongside him. Then you wanna throw in another 6’11” pf/c onto the court at the same time with both of them!!!? Its mindbonggling that someone that has watched even 1 ucf game can come up with such a lineup

I thought the same thing. Is he smoking weed?

C: Tacko
F: Dawkins
G: Griffin
G: DeJesus
G: Taylor

who knows

If tacko does come back i think your lineup will see the most minutes together. When chad brown comes in I think dawkins will try to play smith at the 4 and slide aubrey down to the 3

(03-22-2018 10:16 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 12:02 PM)Doglando Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 11:55 AM)thespiritof1976 Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 11:34 AM)Doglando Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 11:32 AM)BrooklynRocket Wrote:  I think he meant to start Douglas at SG over Dawkins.

Correct i also hear rokas ulvydas will start at point guard over bj

Rokas Ulvydas is a 6-11 PF/C. He will NOT be the starting PG and yet you try to try to call me out ?

Geez. I know you like to try to start stuff with me but you know what ?

It isn't working anymore, friend and to be frankly honest, I don't need people like you trying to rile me up. Not worth it. I'll just put you on ignore and we'll go our separate ways. I actually quite like the back and forth banter here but when you begin to stalk and harass someone only for a reaction, then I've had my fill.

It was a joke because the lineup you put out was absolutely outrageous and those 5 players would never see the court together in a million years. Not a single minute. I promise you

In 3 years together at ucf tacko fall and chad brown have never been on the court at the same time. Both are true centers. Tacko commands the entire paint on both ends of the floor and doesnt allow for any other big to play alongside him. Then you wanna throw in another 6’11” pf/c onto the court at the same time with both of them!!!? Its mindbonggling that someone that has watched even 1 ucf game can come up with such a lineup

I thought the same thing. Is he smoking weed?

C: Tacko
F: Dawkins
G: Griffin
G: DeJesus
G: Taylor

Sir, there is no reason to be insulting or condescending here. I have no quarrel with you anyhow.

It is simply my opinion on a few things I have seen here and there. I do not claim to be an expert. Just a fan. That said, you are probably right. I am most likely wrong. I admit that. Once again, I am just a fan and do not profess to know as much as some of the others here on such things regarding the best lineups, etc...

That said however, the snippy attitudes here have gone too far here, IMO. Pretty sad that two people can't discuss something without one insulting the other.

Pretty crazy to think of an ECU team without BJ Tyson. Seems like he has been on the roster for 10 years.

Jalen dupree granted release from murray state. I see he's an ex-team penny kid. any info here memphis fans

Shake announced NBA prep starts today

(03-25-2018 01:01 PM)Doglando Wrote:  Jalen dupree granted release from murray state. I see he's an ex-team penny kid. any info here memphis fans

I dont think we are looking at him really. He would be a useful piece for a low major program.

@BillyEmbody

News: #SMU guard Shake Milton has declared for the 2018 #NBADraft, but will not hire an agent, sources told @SMU247.