We're on the way to a Civil War. Who's gonna win? How will we tell the good guys from the bad? Are all turds on their heads the bad guys? Or those wearing tight jeans? Or women that look like they didn't take a shower for a while? What?

(03-18-2018 06:35 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  We're on the way to a Civil War. Who's gonna win? How will we tell the good guys from the bad? Are all turds on their heads the bad guys? Or those wearing tight jeans? Or women that look like they didn't take a shower for a while? What?

The police and military will be on the right side. It will be over and I can watch it from my recliner. God help the stupid soy boys if regular folks get involved.

(03-18-2018 08:01 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

Drudge is not even a neutral site. They are mainly in the far right. Some of the neutral polls that Trump favors shows more than 60% of the people want the investigation to continue. It is polled mainly of Democrats, Republicans and Independent voters equally. That poll only shows the far right. I know some friends who vote Republicans are saying that Trump should be impeached.

(03-18-2018 06:14 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(03-18-2018 03:30 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(03-18-2018 03:22 PM)Old Dominion Wrote:  Only conspiracy lunatics really believe in the deep state.

"Deep state is a conspiracy theory."

"If you make a former director of the CIA angry, you’ll regret it.”

Pick one.

How about this one Kronke?

Quote:Schumer warns Trump: Intel officials 'have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you'

The new leader of Democrats in the Senate says Donald Trump is being "really dumb" for picking a fight with intelligence officials, suggesting they have ways to strike back, after the president-elect speculated Tuesday that his "so-called" briefing about Russian cyberattacks had been delayed in order to build a case.

"Let me tell you: You take on the intelligence community — they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you," said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer Tuesday evening on MSNBC after host Rachel Maddow informed him that intelligence sources told NBC news that the briefing had not been delayed.

"So, even for a practical supposedly hard-nosed businessman, he's being really dumb to do this," he added.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/schum...ack-at-you

What would you call threats like that OD? Either Schumer believes there's a deep state or he wants Trump to believe there's one. I'll go with the former.

Coming from a politician I call it 0ver the top hyperbole. Coming from Brennan, especially in light of his most recent tweet, I call it the truth

Surely all of you recognize bureaucrats have their passive-aggressive ways of dealing with bosses they don't like. Doesn't mean any of it rises to the level of "deep State "conspiracy.
If there is such a thing, I suggest it exists between lobbyists and congress, regardless of party affiliation.

I bet many on here are the same ones on the sports boards who always blame the refs for their team losing.

(03-19-2018 07:05 AM)Old Dominion Wrote:  

(03-18-2018 06:14 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(03-18-2018 03:30 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(03-18-2018 03:22 PM)Old Dominion Wrote:  Only conspiracy lunatics really believe in the deep state.

"Deep state is a conspiracy theory."

"If you make a former director of the CIA angry, you’ll regret it.”

Pick one.

How about this one Kronke?

Quote:Schumer warns Trump: Intel officials 'have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you'

The new leader of Democrats in the Senate says Donald Trump is being "really dumb" for picking a fight with intelligence officials, suggesting they have ways to strike back, after the president-elect speculated Tuesday that his "so-called" briefing about Russian cyberattacks had been delayed in order to build a case.

"Let me tell you: You take on the intelligence community — they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you," said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer Tuesday evening on MSNBC after host Rachel Maddow informed him that intelligence sources told NBC news that the briefing had not been delayed.

"So, even for a practical supposedly hard-nosed businessman, he's being really dumb to do this," he added.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/schum...ack-at-you

What would you call threats like that OD? Either Schumer believes there's a deep state or he wants Trump to believe there's one. I'll go with the former.

Coming from a politician I call it 0ver the top hyperbole. Coming from Brennan, especially in light of his most recent tweet, I call it the truth

Surely all of you recognize bureaucrats have their passive-aggressive ways of dealing with bosses they don't like. Doesn't mean any of it rises to the level of "deep State "conspiracy.
If there is such a thing, I suggest it exists between lobbyists and congress, regardless of party affiliation.

I bet many on here are the same ones on the sports boards who always blame the refs for their team losing.

that's the second time you've brought up lobbyists (which is a monster pet peeve of mine).....I couldn't agree with you more....

again, I hate politicians and having to pay attention how the #DJTexperiment will play out long term....

however, I went all-in when he announced and gave reasons why he should be the guy.....it would be shallow of me to take my ball home w/o hanging around to either 'pat him on the back' or denounce his moves after being so vocal beforehand....

fwiw, I've never been a ref basher.....you can review my posts in the Marshall thread on the cusa board for my latest rebuff relative to that 'whine and cheese'....

I've always believed if you say it or write it, one should be able to back up the position or admit the mistake.....IMO, that's how one grows in strength in mind as they age.....

(03-19-2018 07:05 AM)Old Dominion Wrote:  

(03-18-2018 06:14 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(03-18-2018 03:30 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(03-18-2018 03:22 PM)Old Dominion Wrote:  Only conspiracy lunatics really believe in the deep state.

"Deep state is a conspiracy theory."

"If you make a former director of the CIA angry, you’ll regret it.”

Pick one.

How about this one Kronke?

Quote:Schumer warns Trump: Intel officials 'have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you'

The new leader of Democrats in the Senate says Donald Trump is being "really dumb" for picking a fight with intelligence officials, suggesting they have ways to strike back, after the president-elect speculated Tuesday that his "so-called" briefing about Russian cyberattacks had been delayed in order to build a case.

"Let me tell you: You take on the intelligence community — they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you," said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer Tuesday evening on MSNBC after host Rachel Maddow informed him that intelligence sources told NBC news that the briefing had not been delayed.

"So, even for a practical supposedly hard-nosed businessman, he's being really dumb to do this," he added.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/schum...ack-at-you

What would you call threats like that OD? Either Schumer believes there's a deep state or he wants Trump to believe there's one. I'll go with the former.

Coming from a politician I call it 0ver the top hyperbole. Coming from Brennan, especially in light of his most recent tweet, I call it the truth

Surely all of you recognize bureaucrats have their passive-aggressive ways of dealing with bosses they don't like. Doesn't mean any of it rises to the level of "deep State "conspiracy.
If there is such a thing, I suggest it exists between lobbyists and congress, regardless of party affiliation.

I bet many on here are the same ones on the sports boards who always blame the refs for their team losing.

Coming from Brennan, you call it the truth? LOL. 'K.

(03-18-2018 03:19 PM)Old Dominion Wrote:  The closer Mueller gets to Trump, the more desperate he becomes. Really, if DT is so innocent, why not let it play out now so there will never be a shadow of a doubt? Why cut it off, leaving a shadow over his head forever?

With all the scrutiny Mueller gets, if he didn't have something, he'd of packed it in by now. Trump is simply scarred sh.tless Mueller has him by the sack.

It’s still going on because it is a witch hunt. The purpose is to stall, smear, discredit and end Trump’s presidency. It will go on until the end of time if allowed to.

(03-19-2018 02:54 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  Drudge is not even a neutral site. They are mainly in the far right. Some of the neutral polls that Trump favors shows more than 60% of the people want the investigation to continue. It is polled mainly of Democrats, Republicans and Independent voters equally. That poll only shows the far right. I know some friends who vote Republicans are saying that Trump should be impeached.

Thanks for the info.

(03-18-2018 03:19 PM)Old Dominion Wrote:  The closer Mueller gets to Trump, the more desperate he becomes. Really, if DT is so innocent, why not let it play out now so there will never be a shadow of a doubt? Why cut it off, leaving a shadow over his head forever?

With all the scrutiny Mueller gets, if he didn't have something, he'd of packed it in by now. Trump is simply scarred sh.tless Mueller has him by the sack.

Because the more we dig the more this investigation turns out to not be an investigation—but rather the first attempt in history where the government has actually failed to lawfully accept the duly ratified result of an election . The activity of some inside the government essentially amounts to treason. Opposition is one thing, using the law endorcement arm to undermine the new administration with fake charges is completely different.

When this is over—some big important people are going to be in jail...and the media is going to be finished as a trusted news source.

(03-19-2018 09:39 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(03-18-2018 03:19 PM)Old Dominion Wrote:  The closer Mueller gets to Trump, the more desperate he becomes. Really, if DT is so innocent, why not let it play out now so there will never be a shadow of a doubt? Why cut it off, leaving a shadow over his head forever?

With all the scrutiny Mueller gets, if he didn't have something, he'd of packed it in by now. Trump is simply scarred sh.tless Mueller has him by the sack.

Because the more we dig the more this investigation turns out to not be an investigation—but rather the first attempt in history where the government has actually failed to lawfully accept the duly ratified result of an election . The activity of some inside the government essentially amounts to treason. Opposition is one thing, using the law endorcement arm to undermine the new administration with fake charges is completely different.

When this is over—some big important people are going to be in jail...and the media is going to be finished as a trusted news source.

Actually, one of those two has already happened.

(03-19-2018 10:54 AM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 09:39 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(03-18-2018 03:19 PM)Old Dominion Wrote:  The closer Mueller gets to Trump, the more desperate he becomes. Really, if DT is so innocent, why not let it play out now so there will never be a shadow of a doubt? Why cut it off, leaving a shadow over his head forever?

With all the scrutiny Mueller gets, if he didn't have something, he'd of packed it in by now. Trump is simply scarred sh.tless Mueller has him by the sack.

Because the more we dig the more this investigation turns out to not be an investigation—but rather the first attempt in history where the government has actually failed to lawfully accept the duly ratified result of an election . The activity of some inside the government essentially amounts to treason. Opposition is one thing, using the law endorcement arm to undermine the new administration with fake charges is completely different.

When this is over—some big important people are going to be in jail...and the media is going to be finished as a trusted news source.

Actually, one of those two has already happened.

Which fake charges? To my knowledge no one has been charged with "fake charges" in fact many who have been charged have already pled guilty.

(03-19-2018 11:09 AM)Old Dominion Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 10:54 AM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(03-19-2018 09:39 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(03-18-2018 03:19 PM)Old Dominion Wrote:  The closer Mueller gets to Trump, the more desperate he becomes. Really, if DT is so innocent, why not let it play out now so there will never be a shadow of a doubt? Why cut it off, leaving a shadow over his head forever?

With all the scrutiny Mueller gets, if he didn't have something, he'd of packed it in by now. Trump is simply scarred sh.tless Mueller has him by the sack.

Because the more we dig the more this investigation turns out to not be an investigation—but rather the first attempt in history where the government has actually failed to lawfully accept the duly ratified result of an election . The activity of some inside the government essentially amounts to treason. Opposition is one thing, using the law endorcement arm to undermine the new administration with fake charges is completely different.

When this is over—some big important people are going to be in jail...and the media is going to be finished as a trusted news source.

Actually, one of those two has already happened.

Which fake charges? To my knowledge no one has been charged with "fake charges" in fact many who have been charged have already pled guilty.

Is your question directed at me?

Attackcoog.