umbluegray
Legend
Posts: 42,183
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 2027
I Root For: The Tigers!
Location: Memphis
|
RE: Rah Rogh!!! Dicks bout to get sued
(03-06-2018 10:16 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: (03-05-2018 11:32 PM)umbluegray Wrote: (03-05-2018 11:26 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: Easy solution for WalMart and Dicks...just stop selling guns to ANYONE.
That's true. Let's see what they do.
But that's after the fact, though.
They still refused to bake a...
Oh, wait... wrong discrimination case.
Actually if you don't bake wedding cake for anyone, you don't have to bake them for Gays....
But nice try.
The whole non-discrimination thing, right?
And this doesn't apply to Dick's because....?
|
|
03-06-2018 01:07 PM |
|
umbluegray
Legend
Posts: 42,183
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 2027
I Root For: The Tigers!
Location: Memphis
|
RE: Rah Rogh!!! Dicks bout to get sued
(03-06-2018 10:41 AM)Kaplony Wrote: (03-06-2018 10:32 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: I think the simplest solution is to have the Oregon legislature raise the purchase age for a firearm to 21. Heck, while they're at it, why not just raise the possession age for firearms to 21. Allow an exception for long arms (limited capacity long arms only) used in hunting, but those must be in the custody of an adult over 21 while hunting isn't going on. And the person carrying the gun must hold a valid hunting license and it must be during the appropriate hunting season. Or at a supervised marksmanship venue.
If Oregon can restrict alcohol to persons over 21, they can probably restrict gun sales too.
Either, way, if the current policy of Dicks is illegal in Oregon, then the solution is a pretty easy one. Change the law.
That would prevent future lawsuits but it's not going to save them from losing this one.
This.
|
|
03-06-2018 01:09 PM |
|