Wow. Major fraud with serious fallout on other cases

No wonder they wanna cover that up

Yea, the whole thing is being exposed.

Last week we learned that the original judge in the Flynn case recused himself right after Flynn pled guilty. But then we learned that he didnt recuse himself, but was removed by the DC court. Weird.

Emmet Sullivan gets placed on the case, and all hell breaks loose.

If what's being reported is true, crimes have to have been committed, and those responsible need to go to jail. There is no other way to restore confidence in the system, if even that can now do it.

This is the problem with allowing something like the FBI and DOJ to become politicized to the point that it influences their investigative mission.

#headsneedtoroll

Here's a good article detailing what might be going on in this case

Quote:There is cause to believe the FISA court was connected to the criminal charge filed against Flynn because Contreras, who recused less than a week after accepting Flynn’s guilty plea, “is one of just three FISA court judges who sits in the District of Columbia, where it is likely the Trump-Russia FISA warrants were sought.”

Quote:Obama political holdover Sally Yates’ involvement in the case raises additional concerns. While Strzok and Mueller initially indicated they believed Flynn had been truthful, Yates, while serving as acting attorney general, had directed Strzok to interview Flynn and had pushed for charges against Flynn under the Logan Act. Another member of Mueller’s team, Andrew Weissmann, is likewise suspect given his praise for Yates’ refusal to defend Trump’s travel ban. Weissmann remains a part of the special counsel’s team, notwithstanding calls for his ouster.

http://thefederalist.com/2018/02/19/mich...orruption/

If this is indeed true then FBI HQ needs to be completely cleaned out. Replace them with the SACS currently in places like Knoxville, Milwaukee, and Buffalo. Anything but swamp creatures.

(02-19-2018 10:33 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  If this is indeed true then FBI HQ needs to be completely cleaned out. Replace them with the SACS currently in places like Knoxville, Milwaukee, and Buffalo. Anything but swamp creatures.

It was nice to see the new guy they promoted came from outside of DC.

What happened to our team-over-country leftist buddies? No comments? Speechless? Still recovering from the SHOCK that Russian trolls tried to affect our election? This is perplexing.

(02-19-2018 10:33 AM)WKUYG Wrote:  Here's a good article detailing what might be going on in this case

Quote:There is cause to believe the FISA court was connected to the criminal charge filed against Flynn because Contreras, who recused less than a week after accepting Flynn’s guilty plea, “is one of just three FISA court judges who sits in the District of Columbia, where it is likely the Trump-Russia FISA warrants were sought.”

Quote:Obama political holdover Sally Yates’ involvement in the case raises additional concerns. While Strzok and Mueller initially indicated they believed Flynn had been truthful, Yates, while serving as acting attorney general, had directed Strzok to interview Flynn and had pushed for charges against Flynn under the Logan Act. Another member of Mueller’s team, Andrew Weissmann, is likewise suspect given his praise for Yates’ refusal to defend Trump’s travel ban. Weissmann remains a part of the special counsel’s team, notwithstanding calls for his ouster.

http://thefederalist.com/2018/02/19/mich...orruption/

Thanks for the linky WKU. Haven't read the story yet but will in a few minutes and perhaps it'll answer the question I'm going to ask.

What was it about Flynn that had Obama's panties all knotted up? Seems they had it in for the guy from the beginning. I wonder if Strzok and his team were basically ordered to visit him by the White House?

So much to learn, so many more shyte sammiches for the left coming down the conveyer belt.

(02-19-2018 11:10 AM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(02-19-2018 10:33 AM)WKUYG Wrote:  Here's a good article detailing what might be going on in this case

Quote:There is cause to believe the FISA court was connected to the criminal charge filed against Flynn because Contreras, who recused less than a week after accepting Flynn’s guilty plea, “is one of just three FISA court judges who sits in the District of Columbia, where it is likely the Trump-Russia FISA warrants were sought.”

Quote:Obama political holdover Sally Yates’ involvement in the case raises additional concerns. While Strzok and Mueller initially indicated they believed Flynn had been truthful, Yates, while serving as acting attorney general, had directed Strzok to interview Flynn and had pushed for charges against Flynn under the Logan Act. Another member of Mueller’s team, Andrew Weissmann, is likewise suspect given his praise for Yates’ refusal to defend Trump’s travel ban. Weissmann remains a part of the special counsel’s team, notwithstanding calls for his ouster.

http://thefederalist.com/2018/02/19/mich...orruption/

Thanks for the linky WKU. Haven't read the story yet but will in a few minutes and perhaps it'll answer the question I'm going to ask.

What was it about Flynn that had Obama's panties all knotted up? Seems they had it in for the guy from the beginning. I wonder if Strzok and his team were basically ordered to visit him by the White House?

So much to learn, so many more shyte sammiches for the left coming down the conveyer belt.

He had the audacity to disagree with Obama regarding the threat of Islamic terrorism and correctly predicting the outcome in Syria.

https://www.lrb.co.uk/v38/n01/seymour-m-...o-military

Quote:Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, director of the DIA between 2012 and 2014, confirmed that his agency had sent a constant stream of classified warnings to the civilian leadership about the dire consequences of toppling Assad. The jihadists, he said, were in control of the opposition. Turkey wasn’t doing enough to stop the smuggling of foreign fighters and weapons across the border. ‘If the American public saw the intelligence we were producing daily, at the most sensitive level, they would go ballistic,’ Flynn told me. ‘We understood Isis’s long-term strategy and its campaign plans, and we also discussed the fact that Turkey was looking the other way when it came to the growth of the Islamic State inside Syria.’ The DIA’s reporting, he said, ‘got enormous pushback’ from the Obama administration. ‘I felt that they did not want to hear the truth.’

er JCS adviser said. ‘The Joint Chiefs believed that Assad should not be replaced by fundamentalists. The administration’s policy was contradictory. They wanted Assad to go but the opposition was dominated by extremists. So who was going to replace him? To say Assad’s got to go is fine, but if you follow that through – therefore anyone is better. It’s the “anybody else is better” issue that the JCS had with Obama’s policy.’ The Joint Chiefs felt that a direct challenge to Obama’s policy would have ‘had a zero chance of success’. So in the autumn of 2013 they decided to take steps against the extremists without going through political channels, by providing US intelligence to the militaries of other nations, on the understanding that it would be passed on to the Syrian army and used against the common enemy, Jabhat al-Nusra and Islamic State.

How dare he be absolutely right about yet another foreign policy failure of the Obama administration!

(02-19-2018 11:25 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(02-19-2018 11:10 AM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(02-19-2018 10:33 AM)WKUYG Wrote:  Here's a good article detailing what might be going on in this case

Quote:There is cause to believe the FISA court was connected to the criminal charge filed against Flynn because Contreras, who recused less than a week after accepting Flynn’s guilty plea, “is one of just three FISA court judges who sits in the District of Columbia, where it is likely the Trump-Russia FISA warrants were sought.”

Quote:Obama political holdover Sally Yates’ involvement in the case raises additional concerns. While Strzok and Mueller initially indicated they believed Flynn had been truthful, Yates, while serving as acting attorney general, had directed Strzok to interview Flynn and had pushed for charges against Flynn under the Logan Act. Another member of Mueller’s team, Andrew Weissmann, is likewise suspect given his praise for Yates’ refusal to defend Trump’s travel ban. Weissmann remains a part of the special counsel’s team, notwithstanding calls for his ouster.

http://thefederalist.com/2018/02/19/mich...orruption/

Thanks for the linky WKU. Haven't read the story yet but will in a few minutes and perhaps it'll answer the question I'm going to ask.

What was it about Flynn that had Obama's panties all knotted up? Seems they had it in for the guy from the beginning. I wonder if Strzok and his team were basically ordered to visit him by the White House?

So much to learn, so many more shyte sammiches for the left coming down the conveyer belt.

He had the audacity to disagree with Obama regarding the threat of Islamic terrorism and correctly predicting the outcome in Syria.

https://www.lrb.co.uk/v38/n01/seymour-m-...o-military

Quote:Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, director of the DIA between 2012 and 2014, confirmed that his agency had sent a constant stream of classified warnings to the civilian leadership about the dire consequences of toppling Assad. The jihadists, he said, were in control of the opposition. Turkey wasn’t doing enough to stop the smuggling of foreign fighters and weapons across the border. ‘If the American public saw the intelligence we were producing daily, at the most sensitive level, they would go ballistic,’ Flynn told me. ‘We understood Isis’s long-term strategy and its campaign plans, and we also discussed the fact that Turkey was looking the other way when it came to the growth of the Islamic State inside Syria.’ The DIA’s reporting, he said, ‘got enormous pushback’ from the Obama administration. ‘I felt that they did not want to hear the truth.’

er JCS adviser said. ‘The Joint Chiefs believed that Assad should not be replaced by fundamentalists. The administration’s policy was contradictory. They wanted Assad to go but the opposition was dominated by extremists. So who was going to replace him? To say Assad’s got to go is fine, but if you follow that through – therefore anyone is better. It’s the “anybody else is better” issue that the JCS had with Obama’s policy.’ The Joint Chiefs felt that a direct challenge to Obama’s policy would have ‘had a zero chance of success’. So in the autumn of 2013 they decided to take steps against the extremists without going through political channels, by providing US intelligence to the militaries of other nations, on the understanding that it would be passed on to the Syrian army and used against the common enemy, Jabhat al-Nusra and Islamic State.

How dare he be absolutely right about yet another foreign policy failure of the Obama administration!

Very interesting indeed. As I said, it was obvious early-on that Obama had a problem with Flynn, so much so that it appeared he had no problem going after him even when he (Obama) would no longer be in office. In the articles I read though, Obama's problem with Flynn was never discussed.