Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Interesting Info on Southwest Conference
Author Message
esayem Offline
Hark The Sound!
*

Posts: 4,070
Joined: Feb 2007
Reputation: 121
I Root For: The Heels
Location: Tobacco Road
Post: #1
Interesting Info on Southwest Conference
I found this cool resource: https://legacy.lib.utexas.edu/taro/ttusw...00023.html

It has a ton of info on the Southwest Conference. Simple searches provided some interesting tidbits:

"Conference Expansion
East Carolina University General Information, 1993-1994
University of Southwestern Louisiana General Information, 1994"

"Tulane Proposal to Join the SWC, 1991"

"Conference Expansion, 1990"

"Conference Expansion, 1992"


I knew about the second one when Tulane was narrowly denied admission, but the ECU and USL bit is particularly interesting. They must have been some of the few independents after C-USA was formed. I know the SWC only considered inviting independents.
02-02-2018 12:58 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

Attackcoog Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 23,664
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 903
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #2
RE: Interesting Info on Southwest Conference
(02-02-2018 12:58 PM)esayem Wrote:  I found this cool resource: https://legacy.lib.utexas.edu/taro/ttusw...00023.html

It has a ton of info on the Southwest Conference. Simple searches provided some interesting tidbits:

"Conference Expansion
East Carolina University General Information, 1993-1994
University of Southwestern Louisiana General Information, 1994"

"Tulane Proposal to Join the SWC, 1991"

"Conference Expansion, 1990"

"Conference Expansion, 1992"


I knew about the second one when Tulane was narrowly denied admission, but the ECU and USL bit is particularly interesting. They must have been some of the few independents after C-USA was formed. I know the SWC only considered inviting independents.

Two of the latter expansion files (1994) were likely related to the left behinds looking at possible options for rebuilding the conference. Interest in doing so was fairly low with the UH administration (which I always thought was a mistake) and the 4 remaining teams couldnt reach a consensus on who to invite. In the end, they went their separate ways a let the conference die.
(This post was last modified: 02-02-2018 01:38 PM by Attackcoog.)
02-02-2018 01:37 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Wedge Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 12,934
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 396
I Root For: California
Location: Bear Territory
Post: #3
RE: Interesting Info on Southwest Conference
(02-02-2018 01:37 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  
(02-02-2018 12:58 PM)esayem Wrote:  I found this cool resource: https://legacy.lib.utexas.edu/taro/ttusw...00023.html

It has a ton of info on the Southwest Conference. Simple searches provided some interesting tidbits:

"Conference Expansion
East Carolina University General Information, 1993-1994
University of Southwestern Louisiana General Information, 1994"

"Tulane Proposal to Join the SWC, 1991"

"Conference Expansion, 1990"

"Conference Expansion, 1992"


I knew about the second one when Tulane was narrowly denied admission, but the ECU and USL bit is particularly interesting. They must have been some of the few independents after C-USA was formed. I know the SWC only considered inviting independents.

Two of the latter expansion files (1994) were likely related to the left behinds looking at possible options for rebuilding the conference. Interest in doing so was fairly low with the UH administration (which I always thought was a mistake) and the 4 remaining teams couldnt reach a consensus on who to invite. In the end, they went their separate ways a let the conference die.

That makes sense; the four schools that joined the Big 8 were invited in February 1994.

Quote:Four Southwest Conference members - Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech and Baylor - have been invited to join the Big Eight Conference beginning with the 1996-97 school year, the Houston Chronicle, the Houston Post and the Dallas Morning News reported in their editions today.

The Chronicle quoted three SWC school presidents and the Post and the Morning News cited sources in both leagues. The Post said the schools have until Friday to give the Big Eight a decision.

The remaining four teams in the 79-year-old SWC - Southern Methodist, Texas Christian, Rice and Houston - have been told they were not invited to join the Big Eight, the newspapers said.
02-02-2018 01:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fighting Muskie Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 884
Joined: Sep 2016
Reputation: 34
I Root For: Ohio St, MAC
Location:
Post: #4
RE: Interesting Info on Southwest Conference
I always thought the SWC could and should have rebuilt. Tulane and Tulsa would have been logical adds. Maybe UTEP might have taken an interest in playing other Texas schools.

They might have even been able to make a run at some of the other Metro and Great Midwest schools that formed the Metro--USM, Memphis, Louisville, and Cincinnati.
02-02-2018 04:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

arkstfan Away
Sorry folks
*

Posts: 20,732
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 588
I Root For: Fresh Starts
Location:
Post: #5
RE: Interesting Info on Southwest Conference
(02-02-2018 04:08 PM)Fighting Muskie Wrote:  I always thought the SWC could and should have rebuilt. Tulane and Tulsa would have been logical adds. Maybe UTEP might have taken an interest in playing other Texas schools.

They might have even been able to make a run at some of the other Metro and Great Midwest schools that formed the Metro--USM, Memphis, Louisville, and Cincinnati.
Probably would have made more sense, and if Tulane and jumped on the wagon that could have altered the path of CUSA, maybe derailed it.
02-02-2018 04:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fighting Muskie Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 884
Joined: Sep 2016
Reputation: 34
I Root For: Ohio St, MAC
Location:
Post: #6
RE: Interesting Info on Southwest Conference
(02-02-2018 04:21 PM)arkstfan Wrote:  
(02-02-2018 04:08 PM)Fighting Muskie Wrote:  I always thought the SWC could and should have rebuilt. Tulane and Tulsa would have been logical adds. Maybe UTEP might have taken an interest in playing other Texas schools.

They might have even been able to make a run at some of the other Metro and Great Midwest schools that formed the Metro--USM, Memphis, Louisville, and Cincinnati.
Probably would have made more sense, and if Tulane and jumped on the wagon that could have altered the path of CUSA, maybe derailed it.

If Tulane made that move and pulled just one other C-USA founder with them the whole merger might have derailed. Let's say it's USM. that leaves the Metro with:

Louisville
Charlotte (no FB)
USF (no FB yet)
VCU (no FB)
VT (Big East FB)

L'ville, Memphis, and Cincy would be the only founders who played football from day 1 left. Maybe some or all jump on board as full members or football affiliates. Memphis and Cincy would be in an untouched Great Midwest so they would not have felt the pressure to join as full members.
02-02-2018 04:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Attackcoog Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 23,664
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 903
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #7
RE: Interesting Info on Southwest Conference
Back then, my preferred path forward was to rebuild the SWC around the core of remaining schools. I think we only needed 2 more under the existing rules. My second favorite option was to move as a group to a new conference. We could have moved to the WAC doing just that--but UH passed on that opportunity as well.

From what I understand, the UH administration at the time thought that the remaining private schools would not be good partners going forward and that we would be better off aligning with other large public schools. The fact UH passed on options 1 and 2 above in favor of a spread out conference where our fans had zero connection to anyone we played would seem to support what ive heard. Personally, as a college football fan above all else, I absolutely hated the idea of CUSA. It seemed to be much more of a basketball first conference that I didnt think would be a very good fit for the vast majority of UH fans (or the casual college football fans in the city).
(This post was last modified: 02-02-2018 06:46 PM by Attackcoog.)
02-02-2018 05:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

loki_the_bubba Online
All American
*

Posts: 3,146
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation: 109
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location:
Post: #8
RE: Interesting Info on Southwest Conference
(02-02-2018 05:18 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  Back then, my preferred path forward was to rebuild the SWC around the core of remaining schools. I think we only needed 2 more under the existing rules. My second favorite option was to move as a group to a new conference. We could have moved to the WAC doing just that--but UH passed on that opportunity as well.

From what I understand, the UH administration at the time thought that the remaining private schools would not be good partners going forward and that we would be better off aligning with other large public schools. The fact UH passed on options 1 and 2 above in favor of a spread out conference where our fans had zero connection to anyone we played would seem to support what ive heard. Personally, as a college football above all else, I absolutely hated the idea of CUSA. It seemed to be much more of a basketball first conference that I didnt think would be a very good fit for the vast majority of UH fans (or the casual college football fans in the city).
On the other hand, I was very much in favor of UH moving to the new CUSA at that time. It seemed like a massive upgrade in basketball, which was my primary interest at the time. Maybe I was just too stuck in my UH memories of the 60s-80s.

And as for adding Tulsa and Tulane in a reformed SWC, that would be five small private schools with Rice, SMU, and TCU. Not much of a nucleus for TV rights. maybe trade UH to the B12 for Baylor and we could have had an FBS all-private conference.
02-02-2018 05:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Nerdlinger Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 681
Joined: May 2017
Reputation: 20
I Root For: Realignment!
Location: :uoᴉʇɐɔo⌉
Post: #9
RE: Interesting Info on Southwest Conference
If the SWC had survived and rebuilt around the remaining 4 schools, not only could it have preempted the formation of CUSA but also could have inadvertently saved the WAC by preventing it from overexpanding (and by extension possibly saved Big West football too, though that's debatable). Maybe you'd eventually end up with something like this:

SWC
East: Cincinnati, East Carolina, Louisville, Memphis, Southern Miss, UAB
West: Houston, Rice, SMU, TCU, Tulsa, Tulane

WAC
Mountain: Air Force, Colorado State, New Mexico, UNLV, UTEP, Wyoming
Pacific: BYU, Fresno State, Hawaii, San Diego State, San Jose State, Utah

Although the SWC wouldn't be very "southwest" at that point.
(This post was last modified: 02-02-2018 06:17 PM by Nerdlinger.)
02-02-2018 05:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fighting Muskie Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 884
Joined: Sep 2016
Reputation: 34
I Root For: Ohio St, MAC
Location:
Post: #10
RE: Interesting Info on Southwest Conference
It's unfortunate for the SWC schools that they couldn't have worked out a deal to bring them all into C-USA in 1995 at the expense of some of the basketball schools but Cincy, Memphis, and Louisville were the power brokers and Cincy was not going to come on board without the 4 Midwestern Catholic schools.
02-02-2018 05:53 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2018 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2018 MyBB Group.