(02-01-2018 02:30 PM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  

(02-01-2018 01:07 PM)thespiritof1976 Wrote:  Houston goes up when they move back on campus.

ECU and USF need to do much better.

Tulane ?

I don't even know what to say. We did better when we were in the A-Sun playing Belmont, Lipscomb, and Mercer every night 15 years ago.

If we hire the right coach and that coach puts a product on the floor worth cheering for, you'll see our # go way up... and quickly.

I believe that. I think ECU has a really good fan base.

(02-01-2018 02:20 PM)Moody Magic Wrote:  Announced Attendance Averages
1) Wichita State 10,506 (5) - capacity 10,506 (100%)
2) Cinci 8,844 (5)* - capacity 9,400 NKU (94%)
3) UCONN 8,667 (4) - capacity 16,294 or 10,167 (%)
4) SMU 6,587 (5) - capacity 7,000 (94%)
5) Memphis 6,367 (4) - capacity 18,119 (35%)
6) Tulsa 5,395 (4) - capacity 8,355 (65%)
7) Temple 5,339 (5) - capacity 10,200 (52%)
8) UCF 5,276 (4) - capacity 9,465 (56%)
9) Houston 3,751 (4) - capacity 8,100 TSU (46%)
10) ECU 3,593 (5) - capacity 8,000 (45%)
11) USF 3,079 (5) - capacity 10,411 (30%)
12) Tulane 1,790 (5) - capacity 4,100 (44%)

UConn is at 66% capacity.

2 games at Gample and 2 at Excel. Reported attendance 34,668 / Capacity 52922.

(02-01-2018 02:37 PM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  The Tubby hire has failed to arrest the announced attendance slide started under Pastner and in fact it has accelerated.

That seems pretty accurate, snowballing effect, style of play (coach), or present program status is the question. More likely a bit of all three?

Locals down on tubby and not a lot of local players connections.

Multiple years with no NCAA after being spoiled by a dominate run.

Continued trend of lower attendance picking up momentum.

A NCAA birth will most likely heals what ails you. Next year perhaps?

(02-01-2018 02:20 PM)Moody Magic Wrote:  Announced Attendance Averages
1) Wichita State 10,506 (5) - capacity 10,506 (100%)
2) Cinci 8,844 (5)* - capacity 9,400 NKU (94%)
3) UCONN 8,667 (4) - capacity 16,294 or 10,167 (%)
4) SMU 6,587 (5) - capacity 7,000 (94%)
5) Memphis 6,367 (4) - capacity 18,119 (35%)
6) Tulsa 5,395 (4) - capacity 8,355 (65%)
7) Temple 5,339 (5) - capacity 10,200 (52%)
8) UCF 5,276 (4) - capacity 9,465 (56%)
9) Houston 3,751 (4) - capacity 8,100 TSU (46%)
10) ECU 3,593 (5) - capacity 8,000 (45%)
11) USF 3,079 (5) - capacity 10,411 (30%)
12) Tulane 1,790 (5) - capacity 4,100 (44%)

Tulsa use to do so much better no reason for us not to be at 80%+. Got to get back on track.

Maybe Memphis is following the Texas Tech model - four years of Tubby, get a new coach and welcome to the top 10.

(02-01-2018 03:21 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(02-01-2018 02:20 PM)Moody Magic Wrote:  Announced Attendance Averages
1) Wichita State 10,506 (5) - capacity 10,506 (100%)
2) Cinci 8,844 (5)* - capacity 9,400 NKU (94%)
3) UCONN 8,667 (4) - capacity 16,294 or 10,167 (%)
4) SMU 6,587 (5) - capacity 7,000 (94%)
5) Memphis 6,367 (4) - capacity 18,119 (35%)
6) Tulsa 5,395 (4) - capacity 8,355 (65%)
7) Temple 5,339 (5) - capacity 10,200 (52%)
8) UCF 5,276 (4) - capacity 9,465 (56%)
9) Houston 3,751 (4) - capacity 8,100 TSU (46%)
10) ECU 3,593 (5) - capacity 8,000 (45%)
11) USF 3,079 (5) - capacity 10,411 (30%)
12) Tulane 1,790 (5) - capacity 4,100 (44%)

Tulsa use to do so much better no reason for us not to be at 80%+. Got to get back on track.

http://goshockers.com/boxscore.aspx?path=m_bkb&id=7256

1/13/18 attendance: 8,355 (100%)

We gotcha covered for the Shocker game. Full house baby and it only took 9,000 travelling Shocker fans to do it!


T


...

(02-01-2018 02:20 PM)Moody Magic Wrote:  Announced Attendance Averages
1) Wichita State 10,506 (5) - capacity 10,506 (100%)
2) Cinci 8,844 (5)* - capacity 9,400 NKU (94%)
3) UCONN 8,667 (4) - capacity 15,564 or 10,167 (%)
4) SMU 6,587 (5) - capacity 7,000 (94%)
5) Memphis 6,367 (4) - capacity 18,119 (35%)
6) Tulsa 5,395 (4) - capacity 8,355 (65%)
7) Temple 5,339 (5) - capacity 10,200 (52%)
8) UCF 5,276 (4) - capacity 9,465 (56%)
9) Houston 3,751 (4) - capacity 8,100 TSU (46%)
10) ECU 3,593 (5) - capacity 8,000 (45%)
11) USF 3,079 (5) - capacity 10,411 (30%)
12) Tulane 1,790 (5) - capacity 4,100 (44%)

FIFY

(02-01-2018 03:40 PM)C0|db|00ded Wrote:  

(02-01-2018 03:21 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(02-01-2018 02:20 PM)Moody Magic Wrote:  Announced Attendance Averages
1) Wichita State 10,506 (5) - capacity 10,506 (100%)
2) Cinci 8,844 (5)* - capacity 9,400 NKU (94%)
3) UCONN 8,667 (4) - capacity 16,294 or 10,167 (%)
4) SMU 6,587 (5) - capacity 7,000 (94%)
5) Memphis 6,367 (4) - capacity 18,119 (35%)
6) Tulsa 5,395 (4) - capacity 8,355 (65%)
7) Temple 5,339 (5) - capacity 10,200 (52%)
8) UCF 5,276 (4) - capacity 9,465 (56%)
9) Houston 3,751 (4) - capacity 8,100 TSU (46%)
10) ECU 3,593 (5) - capacity 8,000 (45%)
11) USF 3,079 (5) - capacity 10,411 (30%)
12) Tulane 1,790 (5) - capacity 4,100 (44%)

Tulsa use to do so much better no reason for us not to be at 80%+. Got to get back on track.

http://goshockers.com/boxscore.aspx?path=m_bkb&id=7256

1/13/18 attendance: 8,355 (100%)

We gotcha covered for the Shocker game. Full house baby and it only took 9,000 travelling Shocker fans to do it!


T


...

Aww, that's cute. We already had this debate and you lost.

Your material is getting stale. Need to get creative.

XLs capacity is 15,564 not 16k. they renovated the arena in 2014 I think

(02-01-2018 01:17 PM)geef Wrote:  Those Memphis numbers can't be accurate, can they?

Why? We started reporting actual butts in seats, rather than tickets sold, which are far apart this season.

(02-01-2018 03:56 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(02-01-2018 03:40 PM)C0|db|00ded Wrote:  

(02-01-2018 03:21 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(02-01-2018 02:20 PM)Moody Magic Wrote:  Announced Attendance Averages
1) Wichita State 10,506 (5) - capacity 10,506 (100%)
2) Cinci 8,844 (5)* - capacity 9,400 NKU (94%)
3) UCONN 8,667 (4) - capacity 16,294 or 10,167 (%)
4) SMU 6,587 (5) - capacity 7,000 (94%)
5) Memphis 6,367 (4) - capacity 18,119 (35%)
6) Tulsa 5,395 (4) - capacity 8,355 (65%)
7) Temple 5,339 (5) - capacity 10,200 (52%)
8) UCF 5,276 (4) - capacity 9,465 (56%)
9) Houston 3,751 (4) - capacity 8,100 TSU (46%)
10) ECU 3,593 (5) - capacity 8,000 (45%)
11) USF 3,079 (5) - capacity 10,411 (30%)
12) Tulane 1,790 (5) - capacity 4,100 (44%)

Tulsa use to do so much better no reason for us not to be at 80%+. Got to get back on track.

http://goshockers.com/boxscore.aspx?path=m_bkb&id=7256

1/13/18 attendance: 8,355 (100%)

We gotcha covered for the Shocker game. Full house baby and it only took 9,000 travelling Shocker fans to do it!


T


...

Aww, that's cute. We already had this debate and you lost.

Your material is getting stale. Need to get creative.

History is written by the victors. In 50 years us old, decrepit Shocker fans will talk about that 2018 game in Tulsa that was standing room only comprised entirely of Shocker fans. There wasn’t a single Tulsa fan in the building.

(02-01-2018 04:20 PM)AndShock Wrote:  

(02-01-2018 03:56 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(02-01-2018 03:40 PM)C0|db|00ded Wrote:  

(02-01-2018 03:21 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(02-01-2018 02:20 PM)Moody Magic Wrote:  Announced Attendance Averages
1) Wichita State 10,506 (5) - capacity 10,506 (100%)
2) Cinci 8,844 (5)* - capacity 9,400 NKU (94%)
3) UCONN 8,667 (4) - capacity 16,294 or 10,167 (%)
4) SMU 6,587 (5) - capacity 7,000 (94%)
5) Memphis 6,367 (4) - capacity 18,119 (35%)
6) Tulsa 5,395 (4) - capacity 8,355 (65%)
7) Temple 5,339 (5) - capacity 10,200 (52%)
8) UCF 5,276 (4) - capacity 9,465 (56%)
9) Houston 3,751 (4) - capacity 8,100 TSU (46%)
10) ECU 3,593 (5) - capacity 8,000 (45%)
11) USF 3,079 (5) - capacity 10,411 (30%)
12) Tulane 1,790 (5) - capacity 4,100 (44%)

Tulsa use to do so much better no reason for us not to be at 80%+. Got to get back on track.

http://goshockers.com/boxscore.aspx?path=m_bkb&id=7256

1/13/18 attendance: 8,355 (100%)

We gotcha covered for the Shocker game. Full house baby and it only took 9,000 travelling Shocker fans to do it!


T


...

Aww, that's cute. We already had this debate and you lost.

Your material is getting stale. Need to get creative.

History is written by the victors. In 50 years us old, decrepit Shocker fans will talk about that 2018 game in Tulsa that was standing room only comprised entirely of Shocker fans. There wasn’t a single Tulsa fan in Existence

FTFY .. go big or go home.

(02-01-2018 03:19 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(02-01-2018 02:37 PM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  The Tubby hire has failed to arrest the announced attendance slide started under Pastner and in fact it has accelerated.

That seems pretty accurate, snowballing effect, style of play (coach), or present program status is the question. More likely a bit of all three?

Locals down on tubby and not a lot of local players connections.

Multiple years with no NCAA after being spoiled by a dominate run.

Continued trend of lower attendance picking up momentum.

A NCAA birth will most likely heals what ails you. Next year perhaps?

IMO, there are factors (eg, watching at home, cost) beyond the control of any coach concerning attendance. Winning and PR (like his life depends on it) are within the control of Tubby and he needs to deliver.

An NCAA bid next year would be wonderful and the run up to it will help boost attendance.

(02-01-2018 04:13 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(02-01-2018 01:17 PM)geef Wrote:  Those Memphis numbers can't be accurate, can they?

Why? We started reporting actual butts in seats, rather than tickets sold, which are far apart this season.

Is it actual attendance? I have no idea since I only watch on tv and it usually looks really, really sparse. Figured it was more on the order of 4000 or so. I know the UC game had over 10,000 so that juiced up the numbers some so you're probably right.

I look on the bright side, that maybe 6000 or so is our floor for attendance, and we can only go up, right?

(02-01-2018 04:26 PM)Stickboy46 Wrote:  

(02-01-2018 04:20 PM)AndShock Wrote:  

(02-01-2018 03:56 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  

(02-01-2018 03:40 PM)C0|db|00ded Wrote:  

(02-01-2018 03:21 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  Tulsa use to do so much better no reason for us not to be at 80%+. Got to get back on track.

http://goshockers.com/boxscore.aspx?path=m_bkb&id=7256

1/13/18 attendance: 8,355 (100%)

We gotcha covered for the Shocker game. Full house baby and it only took 9,000 travelling Shocker fans to do it!


T


...

Aww, that's cute. We already had this debate and you lost.

Your material is getting stale. Need to get creative.

History is written by the victors. In 50 years us old, decrepit Shocker fans will talk about that 2018 game in Tulsa that was standing room only comprised entirely of Shocker fans. There wasn’t a single Tulsa fan in Existence

FTFY .. go big or go home.

If we had a real coach & talent stacked team, we'd be walking away with attendance lead at 16-17,000. But our admin is content w/ 2500 and the snooze-a-thon that Tubby brings.

What is the capacity going to be at the renovated Hofheinz Pavilion?

(02-01-2018 05:29 PM)robertfoshizzle Wrote:  What is the capacity going to be at the renovated Hofheinz Pavilion?

It depends on how much the people weigh.

See, they're going to have all of these "flexible" seats in which the seat will spread out to fit the girth of the person sitting in it.

In other words - a lot of fatties: lower attendance; non-fatties: higher attendance.

(02-01-2018 02:19 PM)Stickboy46 Wrote:  

(02-01-2018 02:14 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(02-01-2018 01:22 PM)CliftonAve Wrote:  

(02-01-2018 01:04 PM)KnightLight Wrote:  Attendance for most schools go up once conf play starts, so here are the rankings so far for AAC Conf Games just over halfway thru the season:

1) Wichita State 10,506 (5 games)
2) Cinci 8,844 (5)*
3) UCONN 8,667 (4)
4) SMU 6,587 (5)
5) Memphis 6,367 (4)
6) Tulsa 5,395 (4)
7) Temple 5,339 (5)
8) UCF 5,276 (4)
9) Houston 3,751 (4)
10) ECU 3,593 (5)
11) USF 3,079 (5)
12) Tulane 1,790 (5)

AAC Conf Game Average: 5,755


*NOTE: Home games this year played at Univ of Northern Kentucky

Not bad since BKU's BB&T Arena only holds 9,400.

And UC apparently sold out the season so that’s butts in seats

Sold out Season tickets? ... I don't believe they normally allocate 100% of tickets to season tickets.

The number listed for Wichita is sold, not butts in seats. (it's 100% capacity of CKA)

This is correct. We've sold out almost all of the conference games, but the tickets in the student section aren't for sale. The ones aren't picked up by students is the gap in the number I believe. Student attendance has been rough this year, but I can't blame them too much considering the location switch.

(02-01-2018 01:12 PM)2bumsabroad Wrote:  3.5k isnt bad for the product we have put out for the past 20 years

You are right. They aren't bad. Instead, they are horrible! Especially considering actual attendance is closer to half that number. There are high schools that draw more people to their gyms than ECU does. It's truly remarkable how bad ECU basketball has been for so long.