http://www.nationalreview.com/article/45...ct-hillary

Interesting read from Andrew McCarthy. The protection of Hillary Clinton may be a coverup by President Obama to protect himself and his own communications to what he knew was an insecure server.

From the first, these columns have argued that the whitewash of the Hillary Clinton–emails caper was President Barack Obama’s call — not the FBI’s, and not the Justice Department’s. (See, e.g., here, here, and here.) The decision was inevitable. Obama, using a pseudonymous email account, had repeatedly communicated with Secretary Clinton over her private, non-secure email account...."

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/45...ct-hillary

I read this article earlier today. A compelling read. Makes a convincing case that this whole mess begins with lord Zero...

When he announced HRC should not be charged it was collusion... but of course the magical Barack... got away with everything... he already ruined our nation... so what difference does it make now...

It's not like college athletics... we can't vacate the little douchebag's presidency...

He is responsible for the corruption in FBI and CIA, appointing Holder to stack the deck.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I hope the skinny worthless phucker ends up seeking asylum in Kenya.

(01-24-2018 06:38 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  I hope the skinny worthless phucker ends up seeking asylum in Kenya.

Fake news. Why would Obama protect Hillary Clinton unless she told him to protect her, or she will have him assassinated?

(01-24-2018 06:54 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  Fake news. Why would Obama protect Hillary Clinton unless she told him to protect her, or she will have him assassinated?

Not protecting HER, protecting HIMSELF.

(01-24-2018 04:18 PM)bullet Wrote:  http://www.nationalreview.com/article/45...ct-hillary

Interesting read from Andrew McCarthy. The protection of Hillary Clinton may be a coverup by President Obama to protect himself and his own communications to what he knew was an insecure server.

From the first, these columns have argued that the whitewash of the Hillary Clinton–emails caper was President Barack Obama’s call — not the FBI’s, and not the Justice Department’s. (See, e.g., here, here, and here.) The decision was inevitable. Obama, using a pseudonymous email account, had repeatedly communicated with Secretary Clinton over her private, non-secure email account...."

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/45...ct-hillary

I think their close. The cover up was to make sure Hillary won so the illegal stuff they did (weaponizing the state intel agencies and the IRS) would never get uncovered.

(01-24-2018 07:12 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(01-24-2018 04:18 PM)bullet Wrote:  http://www.nationalreview.com/article/45...ct-hillary

Interesting read from Andrew McCarthy. The protection of Hillary Clinton may be a coverup by President Obama to protect himself and his own communications to what he knew was an insecure server.

From the first, these columns have argued that the whitewash of the Hillary Clinton–emails caper was President Barack Obama’s call — not the FBI’s, and not the Justice Department’s. (See, e.g., here, here, and here.) The decision was inevitable. Obama, using a pseudonymous email account, had repeatedly communicated with Secretary Clinton over her private, non-secure email account...."

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/45...ct-hillary

I think their close. The cover up was to make sure Hillary won so the illegal stuff they did (weaponizing the state intel agencies and the IRS) would never get uncovered.

Indeed. This, and only this.

Everyone here, left and right, need to read that article.