Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Sagarin final conference rankings
Author Message
bullet Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 23,723
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 521
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #1
Sagarin final conference rankings
http://sagarin.com/sports/cfsend.htm
SEC West toughest division, but SEC #4 overall. Missouri Valley ranks ahead of 3 FBS conferences, but those 3 had a decent gap over the rest of FCS.
1. Big 12 78.45
2. ACC 78.29
3. Big 10 78.25
4. SEC 77.12
5. Pac 12 76.07
6. AAC 66.26
7. MWC 61.88
8. MVC 60.72
9. MAC 59.83
10. CUSA 56.90
11. SB 54.80
12. Colonial 50.67
13. Big Sky 49.90
14. Southern 47.74
15. Ivy 42.93
01-10-2018 01:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

MWC Tex Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,795
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 118
I Root For: MW
Location: TX
Post: #2
RE: Sagarin final conference rankings
CUSA still ranks over the Sunbelt I see...that is going to upset quite a few SB fans.

If I'm not mistaken, this is used to rank the G5 conferences for the performance bonus that is set aside from the dedicated $10 million per conference.
01-10-2018 02:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jaredf29 Offline
Smiter of Trolls
*

Posts: 5,944
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 229
I Root For: UCF
Location: Nor Cal
Post: #3
RE: Sagarin final conference rankings
PAC 12?
01-10-2018 02:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
leofrog Online
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 133
Joined: May 2005
Reputation: 7
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #4
RE: Sagarin final conference rankings
(01-10-2018 01:52 PM)bullet Wrote:  http://sagarin.com/sports/cfsend.htm
SEC West toughest division, but SEC #4 overall. Missouri Valley ranks ahead of 3 FBS conferences, but those 3 had a decent gap over the rest of FCS.
1. Big 12 78.45
2. ACC 78.29
3. Big 10 78.25
4. SEC 77.12
5. Pac 12 76.07
6. AAC 66.26
7. MWC 61.88
8. MVC 60.72
9. MAC 59.83
10. CUSA 56.90
11. SB 54.80
12. Colonial 50.67
13. Big Sky 49.90
14. Southern 47.74
15. Ivy 42.93
So, the "P6" AAC is closer to the 10th conference than the 5th. I guess it should be more like "P10" then. ?
01-10-2018 02:31 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 14,490
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 738
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #5
RE: Sagarin final conference rankings
Sagarin has had a built in bias in the programming since its inception. Nothing new here to see. S.o.S.
01-10-2018 02:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ken d Online
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,094
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 308
I Root For: college sports
Location: Raleigh
Post: #6
RE: Sagarin final conference rankings
I have calculated a 3 year trailing average for each conference as it is now constituted. That is, I used the ratings for each team presently in each conference over the past 8 years, regardless of what conference they may have been in previously. So, improvements or declines are not a result of changes in conference membership - only performance by current members.

The first year for which I had 3 years of data was 2012. The last column in the table below shows the improvement (+) or decline (-) since 2012.

Conf...2017...2016...2015...2014...2013...2012...diff

SEC....79.0....81.0.....81.7...82.0....81.4...81.2....-2.2
ACC....77.7....76.4....75.0....74.4...73.3...73.0...+4.7
B12....76.7....76.5....76.9....77.8...79.7...79.4....-2.7
PAC....76.3....76.8....78.8....78.1...77.4...77.1...-0.8
B1G....75.8....75.0....74.8....74.4...74.0...74.4...+1.4
AAC....66.7....64.5....64.0....64.2...66.8...67.7...-1.0
MWC...62.3...62.2....62.4....63.5....64.3...65.7...-3.4
MAC....59.5...58.6....58.1....59.3....61.2...61.1...-1.6
SBC....57.7...58.8....57.9....58.6....57.2...57.2...+0.5
CUSA..56.7...59.4....59.2....60.0....59.2...60.1...-3.4

The use of the three year trailing average is a smoothing technique meant to minimize distortion in trend analysis caused by a single anomalous year. An improvement or decline from year to year doesn't make a trend. That is just normal variation found in all data. Three consecutive years, or four out of five years, of movement in the same direction is probably a trend.

By that measure, the ACC is clearly trending up, with five consecutive years of improvement. And the MWC is clearly trending down.

As in all previous data we have seen, the demarcation between the P5 conferences and the G5 conferences is clear and consistent. And the gap among P5 conferences is getting smaller - parity is here.
01-10-2018 02:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Crump1 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,371
Joined: Oct 2009
Reputation: 66
I Root For: stAte
Location:
Post: #7
RE: Sagarin final conference rankings
(01-10-2018 02:08 PM)MWC Tex Wrote:  CUSA still ranks over the Sunbelt I see...that is going to upset quite a few SB fans.

If I'm not mistaken, this is used to rank the G5 conferences for the performance bonus that is set aside from the dedicated $10 million per conference.
I believe you are mistaken on the bonuses. This system has always been garbage. They rate an FCS conference ahead of 3 FBS conferences and they mix in FCS teams as if they play the same type of schedule.
01-10-2018 05:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

ken d Online
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,094
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 308
I Root For: college sports
Location: Raleigh
Post: #8
RE: Sagarin final conference rankings
(01-10-2018 02:41 PM)JRsec Wrote:  Sagarin has had a built in bias in the programming since its inception. Nothing new here to see. S.o.S.

If you look at my post immediately after yours, it would seem that if there is bias, it has consistently favored the SEC, don't you think?
01-10-2018 05:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Michael in Raleigh Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 835
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation: 27
I Root For: App State
Location:
Post: #9
RE: Sagarin final conference rankings
(01-10-2018 02:08 PM)MWC Tex Wrote:  CUSA still ranks over the Sunbelt I see...that is going to upset quite a few SB fans.

If I'm not mistaken, this is used to rank the G5 conferences for the performance bonus that is set aside from the dedicated $10 million per conference.

Bowl season aside, the SBC had a horrible non conference record. This ranking serves as no surprise
01-10-2018 05:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Attackcoog Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 23,342
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 886
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #10
RE: Sagarin final conference rankings
(01-10-2018 02:31 PM)leofrog Wrote:  
(01-10-2018 01:52 PM)bullet Wrote:  http://sagarin.com/sports/cfsend.htm
SEC West toughest division, but SEC #4 overall. Missouri Valley ranks ahead of 3 FBS conferences, but those 3 had a decent gap over the rest of FCS.
1. Big 12 78.45
2. ACC 78.29
3. Big 10 78.25
4. SEC 77.12
5. Pac 12 76.07
6. AAC 66.26
7. MWC 61.88
8. MVC 60.72
9. MAC 59.83
10. CUSA 56.90
11. SB 54.80
12. Colonial 50.67
13. Big Sky 49.90
14. Southern 47.74
15. Ivy 42.93
So, the "P6" AAC is closer to the 10th conference than the 5th. I guess it should be more like "P10" then. ?

Barely. The real surprise to me was that the all 5 power conferences were bunched within a narrow 2.38 point range. Thats a MUCH tighter range than last year.
(This post was last modified: 01-10-2018 05:31 PM by Attackcoog.)
01-10-2018 05:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2018 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2018 MyBB Group.