Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Early Look All-MAC MBB
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
H2Oville Rocket Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 22,792
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 113
I Root For: Toledo R0ckets
Location:
Post: #21
RE: Early Look All-MAC MBB
(02-08-2018 06:26 PM)axeme Wrote:  I’ve always thought stats were a good starting point, but shouldn’t be the ultimate determining factor for individual awards. There are just too many other factors that play into individual performance, like the teammates you play with, the tempo you play at, etc. One player’s 16 ppg./8 reb. might be better than another’s 18/10. I think the subjective element is really important. You have to weigh a lot more than raw stats.

CMU’s high scoring guards of last year being case in point.
02-09-2018 10:53 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BullBoy Online
1st String
*

Posts: 1,047
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation: 8
I Root For: Buffalo
Location:
Post: #22
RE: Early Look All-MAC MBB
(02-09-2018 10:53 AM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  
(02-08-2018 06:26 PM)axeme Wrote:  I’ve always thought stats were a good starting point, but shouldn’t be the ultimate determining factor for individual awards. There are just too many other factors that play into individual performance, like the teammates you play with, the tempo you play at, etc. One player’s 16 ppg./8 reb. might be better than another’s 18/10. I think the subjective element is really important. You have to weigh a lot more than raw stats.

CMU’s high scoring guards of last year being case in point.

I think if you look at Buffalo, they are such a balanced team with Massinburg, Harris, Clark, and Perkins that they shouldn't be punished because their stats might not be as high as some other players who don't have the same support around them.
02-09-2018 11:07 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
axeme Offline
Sage
*

Posts: 18,217
Joined: May 2002
Reputation: 83
I Root For: hoops
Location: Location: Location:

Folding@NCAAbbsDonatorsCrappiesCrappiesCrappiesCrappiesCrappies
Post: #23
RE: Early Look All-MAC MBB
(02-09-2018 11:07 AM)BullBoy Wrote:  
(02-09-2018 10:53 AM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  
(02-08-2018 06:26 PM)axeme Wrote:  I’ve always thought stats were a good starting point, but shouldn’t be the ultimate determining factor for individual awards. There are just too many other factors that play into individual performance, like the teammates you play with, the tempo you play at, etc. One player’s 16 ppg./8 reb. might be better than another’s 18/10. I think the subjective element is really important. You have to weigh a lot more than raw stats.

CMU’s high scoring guards of last year being case in point.

I think if you look at Buffalo, they are such a balanced team with Massinburg, Harris, Clark, and Perkins that they shouldn't be punished because their stats might not be as high as some other players who don't have the same support around them.

My point exactly. In a perfect world, you pick the 5 guys who you would take if you were choosing the best team you could construct. You’d pick them on how they play, not on who has the highest numbers.
02-09-2018 11:30 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bull_Is_Back Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,656
Joined: Oct 2016
Reputation: 519
I Root For: Buffalo
Location:
Post: #24
RE: Early Look All-MAC MBB
(02-09-2018 11:30 AM)axeme Wrote:  
(02-09-2018 11:07 AM)BullBoy Wrote:  
(02-09-2018 10:53 AM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  
(02-08-2018 06:26 PM)axeme Wrote:  I’ve always thought stats were a good starting point, but shouldn’t be the ultimate determining factor for individual awards. There are just too many other factors that play into individual performance, like the teammates you play with, the tempo you play at, etc. One player’s 16 ppg./8 reb. might be better than another’s 18/10. I think the subjective element is really important. You have to weigh a lot more than raw stats.

CMU’s high scoring guards of last year being case in point.

I think if you look at Buffalo, they are such a balanced team with Massinburg, Harris, Clark, and Perkins that they shouldn't be punished because their stats might not be as high as some other players who don't have the same support around them.

My point exactly. In a perfect world, you pick the 5 guys who you would take if you were choosing the best team you could construct. You’d pick them on how they play, not on who has the highest numbers.

Yea but at the same time "Most valuable player" is not "best player", or at least that's my take. The MVP, in my view should..

1 - Come from a competitive team. Not necessarily one of the top two, but if you're a 4-14 team was anyone "really" valuable?
2 - Be vital to that teams success
3 - Stand out statistically in at least two categories
02-09-2018 12:34 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DICK Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,453
Joined: Nov 2002
Reputation: 17
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #25
RE: Early Look All-MAC MBB
(02-09-2018 12:34 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  
(02-09-2018 11:30 AM)axeme Wrote:  
(02-09-2018 11:07 AM)BullBoy Wrote:  
(02-09-2018 10:53 AM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  
(02-08-2018 06:26 PM)axeme Wrote:  I’ve always thought stats were a good starting point, but shouldn’t be the ultimate determining factor for individual awards. There are just too many other factors that play into individual performance, like the teammates you play with, the tempo you play at, etc. One player’s 16 ppg./8 reb. might be better than another’s 18/10. I think the subjective element is really important. You have to weigh a lot more than raw stats.

CMU’s high scoring guards of last year being case in point.

I think if you look at Buffalo, they are such a balanced team with Massinburg, Harris, Clark, and Perkins that they shouldn't be punished because their stats might not be as high as some other players who don't have the same support around them.

My point exactly. In a perfect world, you pick the 5 guys who you would take if you were choosing the best team you could construct. You’d pick them on how they play, not on who has the highest numbers.

Yea but at the same time "Most valuable player" is not "best player", or at least that's my take. The MVP, in my view should..

1 - Come from a competitive team. Not necessarily one of the top two, but if you're a 4-14 team was anyone "really" valuable?
2 - Be vital to that teams success
3 - Stand out statistically in at least two categories

But don't we give out a Player of the Year award, not a MVP award.
02-09-2018 01:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bull_Is_Back Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,656
Joined: Oct 2016
Reputation: 519
I Root For: Buffalo
Location:
Post: #26
RE: Early Look All-MAC MBB
(02-09-2018 01:19 PM)DICK Wrote:  
(02-09-2018 12:34 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  
(02-09-2018 11:30 AM)axeme Wrote:  
(02-09-2018 11:07 AM)BullBoy Wrote:  
(02-09-2018 10:53 AM)H2Oville Rocket Wrote:  CMU’s high scoring guards of last year being case in point.

I think if you look at Buffalo, they are such a balanced team with Massinburg, Harris, Clark, and Perkins that they shouldn't be punished because their stats might not be as high as some other players who don't have the same support around them.

My point exactly. In a perfect world, you pick the 5 guys who you would take if you were choosing the best team you could construct. You’d pick them on how they play, not on who has the highest numbers.

Yea but at the same time "Most valuable player" is not "best player", or at least that's my take. The MVP, in my view should..

1 - Come from a competitive team. Not necessarily one of the top two, but if you're a 4-14 team was anyone "really" valuable?
2 - Be vital to that teams success
3 - Stand out statistically in at least two categories

But don't we give out a Player of the Year award, not a MVP award.

I always viewed it as an MVP... But I think you're right.
02-09-2018 01:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
NIU007 Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 26,864
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 196
I Root For: NIU, MAC
Location: Naperville, IL
Post: #27
RE: Early Look All-MAC MBB
I think you can be most valuable and still be on a bad team.
02-09-2018 01:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
pono Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,087
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation: 48
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #28
RE: Early Look All-MAC MBB
(02-09-2018 01:59 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  I think you can be most valuable and still be on a bad team.

only if you are the dominant player in the league and your team isn't that bad (basically because of you)

this year it will probably go to the top player from the top team. buffalo and toledo are pretty far ahead of the pack and no one on an average or weak team is great (there are a few guys who can make a case for all-mac). buffalo kind of spread the wealth between 3 guys while toledo has 2. to me fletcher is the biggest difference maker in the league. without him toledo would be back in the middle of the pack.

top 10 MAC players
clark
massenburg
perkins
fletcher
sanford
wilder
persons
ringo
german
thompson

hon mention
walker
ivey
bond
minnie
roundtree
sibande
(This post was last modified: 02-11-2018 03:08 AM by pono.)
02-11-2018 02:59 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bg816 Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 309
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 1
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #29
RE: Early Look All-MAC MBB
(02-11-2018 02:59 AM)pono Wrote:  
(02-09-2018 01:59 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  I think you can be most valuable and still be on a bad team.

only if you are the dominant player in the league and your team isn't that bad (basically because of you)

this year it will probably go to the top player from the top team. buffalo and toledo are pretty far ahead of the pack and no one on an average or weak team is great (there are a few guys who can make a case for all-mac). buffalo kind of spread the wealth between 3 guys while toledo has 2. to me fletcher is the biggest difference maker in the league. without him toledo would be back in the middle of the pack.

top 10 MAC players
clark
massenburg
perkins
fletcher
sanford
wilder
persons
ringo
german
thompson

hon mention
walker
ivey
bond
minnie
roundtree
sibande

I’d throw BG’s Wiggins in there somewhere. Maybe Turner, but he’s been so inconsistent I’d understand the disagreement.
02-11-2018 04:20 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UofToledoFans Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,320
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation: 45
I Root For: Toledo and G5
Location:
Post: #30
RE: Early Look All-MAC MBB
(02-11-2018 04:20 AM)bg816 Wrote:  
(02-11-2018 02:59 AM)pono Wrote:  
(02-09-2018 01:59 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  I think you can be most valuable and still be on a bad team.

only if you are the dominant player in the league and your team isn't that bad (basically because of you)

this year it will probably go to the top player from the top team. buffalo and toledo are pretty far ahead of the pack and no one on an average or weak team is great (there are a few guys who can make a case for all-mac). buffalo kind of spread the wealth between 3 guys while toledo has 2. to me fletcher is the biggest difference maker in the league. without him toledo would be back in the middle of the pack.

top 10 MAC players
clark
massenburg
perkins
fletcher
sanford
wilder
persons
ringo
german
thompson

hon mention
walker
ivey
bond
minnie
roundtree
sibande

I’d throw BG’s Wiggins in there somewhere. Maybe Turner, but he’s been so inconsistent I’d understand the disagreement.

I agree. Wiggins should be 2nd or 3rd team.
02-11-2018 02:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2018 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2018 MyBB Group.