Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Okay, while we are waiting for bowl season. Does P12 and B10 push for power 4?
Author Message
msm96wolf Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,558
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation: 180
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #1
Okay, while we are waiting for bowl season. Does P12 and B10 push for power 4?
Again, this is more if sitting at a bar conversation and brainstorming. Not that it will happen.

Since everyone talks about an 8 team playoff, basically make CCG the Semi's with CFP able to reward the best teams. IE: Say there is a 1 Loss Penn State and 1 Loss OSU in one division loses to a 9-3 loss Nebraska. The one loss team is still in the hunt for a CFP spot.

It only takes 8 teams dissolve the B12. If the B10 and PAC12 agree to take 6 teams and they only need to get the ACC or SEC to take 2 team.

Breakdown TV Money fox TV goes B10 & Pac 12, ESPN goes to other SEC and ACC.

B10 - Kansas and Iowa St
P12 - Tx, TT, Ok, OSu
ACC - TCU & offer ND, if they refuse, take Baylor/WV (ND may chose to be independent)
SEC - Kansas St and WV/Baylor
12-10-2017 06:34 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


quo vadis Online
Legend
*

Posts: 50,149
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2417
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
Post: #2
RE: Okay, while we are waiting for bowl season. Does P12 and B10 push for power 4?
(12-10-2017 06:34 PM)msm96wolf Wrote:  Again, this is more if sitting at a bar conversation and brainstorming. Not that it will happen.

Since everyone talks about an 8 team playoff ...

Thing is, as soon as we get an 8-team playoff, "everyone" will immediately start clamoring for a 16-team playoff, just like when we had the BCS, and there was big controversy over who should be #2, everyone would say "a four-team playoff would solve this and make everyone happy!"

Truth is, no playoff format will do that. We know this because the Big Dance has 68 freaking teams, and yet the entire month leading up to Selection Sunday is dominated by talk of "who is on the bubble" and as soon as the teams are selected, it's about "whose bubble burst", "who got robbed", etc.

It's really pointless. Think about it: The only sports where there is no controversy about who made the playoffs are sports in which there are no 'at large' bids, where every spot is determined by some formula that involves winning a division followed by formal tie-breakers.

As long as someone is going to be selected by humans, there will be controversy and unhappiness, no matter if the field is 4 teams or 400 teams.
(This post was last modified: 12-10-2017 11:27 PM by quo vadis.)
12-10-2017 11:24 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
AntiG Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,401
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 45
I Root For: Rutgers
Location: NYC
Post: #3
RE: Okay, while we are waiting for bowl season. Does P12 and B10 push for power 4?
probably in the 2020s before the B12 GOR expires... but the B1G isn't going to expand with KU and ISU, and certainly not going to do that for the sake of helping another conference add serious revenue. If they add only two, it'll likely only be for UT + OU since ND won't even consider joining anyway. If they can't get both, then at least one of them. If neither, no chance whatsoever.
12-11-2017 12:14 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kittonhead Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,000
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation: 122
I Root For: Beat Matisse
Location:
Post: #4
RE: Okay, while we are waiting for bowl season. Does P12 and B10 push for power 4?
I don't think the B12 will be wholly absorbed by the P4.

Unless its down to under 4 schools at once.
12-11-2017 12:38 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
quo vadis Online
Legend
*

Posts: 50,149
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2417
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
Post: #5
RE: Okay, while we are waiting for bowl season. Does P12 and B10 push for power 4?
(12-10-2017 06:34 PM)msm96wolf Wrote:  Again, this is more if sitting at a bar conversation and brainstorming. Not that it will happen.

Since everyone talks about an 8 team playoff, basically make CCG the Semi's with CFP able to reward the best teams. IE: Say there is a 1 Loss Penn State and 1 Loss OSU in one division loses to a 9-3 loss Nebraska. The one loss team is still in the hunt for a CFP spot.

It only takes 8 teams dissolve the B12. If the B10 and PAC12 agree to take 6 teams and they only need to get the ACC or SEC to take 2 team.

Breakdown TV Money fox TV goes B10 & Pac 12, ESPN goes to other SEC and ACC.

B10 - Kansas and Iowa St
P12 - Tx, TT, Ok, OSu
ACC - TCU & offer ND, if they refuse, take Baylor/WV (ND may chose to be independent)
SEC - Kansas St and WV/Baylor

Why on earth would any of the other "P4" want to see the PAC become much more powerful by picking up Texas and Oklahoma why they settle for scraps?
12-11-2017 09:39 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bogg Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,856
Joined: Sep 2016
Reputation: 157
I Root For: UConn
Location:
Post: #6
RE: Okay, while we are waiting for bowl season. Does P12 and B10 push for power 4?
Why would every Big 12 school wind up in a new conference? I think we're headed toward a de facto P4, but it's going to wind up being a round of contraction, not a shuffling of the pile.
12-11-2017 10:23 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


goofus Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,321
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 151
I Root For: Iowa
Location: chicago suburbs
Post: #7
RE: Okay, while we are waiting for bowl season. Does P12 and B10 push for power 4?
The best answer is for PAC and Big 12 to merge into 1 conference. But that would be too big with too much dead weight. So instead the 10 best schools from the PAC and 8 best schools from the Big 12 should leave to form a new 18-team western super conference.

Left out would be Wash St and Oregon St. from the PAC, who would be forced to join the MWC.

And West Virginia and Baylor from the Big 12 will be left out. WV because of geography and Baylor because of recent scandals. WV and Baylor will be forced to join the AAC.
12-11-2017 10:41 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Nerdlinger Offline
Realignment Enthusiast
*

Posts: 4,914
Joined: May 2017
Reputation: 423
I Root For: Realignment!
Location: Schmlocation
Post: #8
RE: Okay, while we are waiting for bowl season. Does P12 and B10 push for power 4?
(12-10-2017 06:34 PM)msm96wolf Wrote:  Again, this is more if sitting at a bar conversation and brainstorming. Not that it will happen.

Since everyone talks about an 8 team playoff, basically make CCG the Semi's with CFP able to reward the best teams. IE: Say there is a 1 Loss Penn State and 1 Loss OSU in one division loses to a 9-3 loss Nebraska. The one loss team is still in the hunt for a CFP spot.

It only takes 8 teams dissolve the B12. If the B10 and PAC12 agree to take 6 teams and they only need to get the ACC or SEC to take 2 team.

Breakdown TV Money fox TV goes B10 & Pac 12, ESPN goes to other SEC and ACC.

B10 - Kansas and Iowa St
P12 - Tx, TT, Ok, OSu
ACC - TCU & offer ND, if they refuse, take Baylor/WV (ND may chose to be independent)
SEC - Kansas St and WV/Baylor

There's no way at all this would happen through a collective agreement of the theoretical P4 or the current P5. The Pac clearly gains far more than the other conferences in the scenario you present. The others won't merely acquiesce. Texas will be fought over, likely by the Big Ten and Pac, but also possibly by the SEC or ACC. Oklahoma will be fought over by the Big Ten, Pac, and SEC.

Oklahoma will probably be the catalyst. The Big Ten may be an attractive conference, but they won't allow OSU to tag along. Also OU would be very much out of place geographically and culturally. The Pac has already shown itself to be amenable to taking OSU. The SEC might be willing to take the OK schools as a pair. OU and OSU aren't exactly attached at the hip, but OU should have enough leverage to bring little brother along.

The OK schools alone would also be rather out of place geographically and culturally in the Pac. But the Pac has more room to grow than the Big Ten or SEC, so at least two Texas schools can come along as well. If one of those schools isn't UT, however, there likely won't be any Pac expansion at all.

Texas of course has the most options of any Big 12 school. Assuming the Big 12 does indeed break down, I see the Longhorns going to the Pac before any other conference. They would have the same problem as OU in joining the Big Ten. The SEC might fight for UT, but they already have A&M, which in itself is a deterrent to UT. Independence or the FB-only ACC route both seem like a stretch.

The Pac would naturally be pleased to add UT. However, UT would not join without conditions. Some deal favoring UT would have to be made regarding the Longhorn and Pac networks. Also, at least one friend (more likely three) would have to tag along. If OU opts for the Pac, then you'll likely see a OU/OSU/UT/TT combo, as was already attempted by the Pac.

If OU opts for the SEC, then UT would want to bring two more TX friends with to the Pac. This would come down to TCU, Baylor, and Houston, I imagine. Rice would be nice, but their academics are not nearly up to snuff. My money would be on TCU and Houston. Baylor is damaged property, too religious/right-wing for the Pac, and not in a desirable metro area.

Without either OU or UT, the SEC is unlikely to expand. The Big Ten might want to pick up Kansas, but finding #16 would be tough given their self-imposed high standards. Iowa State gives them basically nothing, and it might prove difficult to pry Missouri loose from the SEC even if the Big Ten wanted to.

The ACC will only expand to 16 if Notre Dame goes all in. The ACC might consider adding WV as #15, but that's where they'd stop (that is, if the SEC doesn't bite first, perhaps adding WV along with OU or as a replacement for Missouri). If ND becomes a full member, the other contenders for the ACC's #16 are Cincinnati and UConn.

Baylor, KSU, and ISU have basically no chance to remain power conference schools if the Big 12 goes down.
(This post was last modified: 12-11-2017 11:07 AM by Nerdlinger.)
12-11-2017 11:01 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GoldenWarrior11 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,680
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation: 610
I Root For: Marquette, BE
Location: Chicago
Post: #9
RE: Okay, while we are waiting for bowl season. Does P12 and B10 push for power 4?
Nice in theory, but the reality is that it is near impossible to find a home for at least 8 Big 12 programs in the four power conferences. After Texas and Oklahoma (and you can possibly group OK State/TCU in this group as well), are any of the other power conferences really pushing for the remaining programs?

An easier solution could - potentially - expand the playoff to six teams (instead of eight), and have each conference have their representative, with an at-large bid for #6. This solves a couple of issues. 1.) It guarantees each of the P5 to have a spot in the playoff. 2.) It allows Notre Dame to still have a great shot at getting into the playoff without forcing them into a conference. 3.) It provides a marginal sliver of hope for the G5, if they have an undefeated team to potentially get into a playoff. 4.) It only adds an additional week of games. 5.) It also removes the worry about putting two teams from a conference in, over one from a conference that is not going in.
12-11-2017 11:04 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SC-KNIGHT Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 126
Joined: Nov 2017
Reputation: 3
I Root For: USC-RUTGERS
Location:
Post: #10
RE: Okay, while we are waiting for bowl season. Does P12 and B10 push for power 4?
(12-10-2017 06:34 PM)msm96wolf Wrote:  Again, this is more if sitting at a bar conversation and brainstorming. Not that it will happen.

Since everyone talks about an 8 team playoff, basically make CCG the Semi's with CFP able to reward the best teams. IE: Say there is a 1 Loss Penn State and 1 Loss OSU in one division loses to a 9-3 loss Nebraska. The one loss team is still in the hunt for a CFP spot.

It only takes 8 teams dissolve the B12. If the B10 and PAC12 agree to take 6 teams and they only need to get the ACC or SEC to take 2 team.

Breakdown TV Money fox TV goes B10 & Pac 12, ESPN goes to other SEC and ACC.

B10 - Kansas and Iowa St
P12 - Tx, TT, Ok, OSu
ACC - TCU & offer ND, if they refuse, take Baylor/WV (ND may chose to be independent)
SEC - Kansas St and WV/Baylor

If this is bar conversation then I would tell you that nothing is changing until the GOR's and the current College Play Off Contract run out, and then let you pick up the bar tab for everyone who chimes in on this thread. 04-jawdrop 04-jawdrop 03-nutkick 03-lmfao 03-lmfao 02-13-banana 02-13-banana COGS COGS 04-rock 04-rock 04-cheers
12-11-2017 11:44 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
YNot Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,672
Joined: May 2014
Reputation: 298
I Root For: BYU
Location:
Post: #11
RE: Okay, while we are waiting for bowl season. Does P12 and B10 push for power 4?
(12-10-2017 11:24 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(12-10-2017 06:34 PM)msm96wolf Wrote:  Again, this is more if sitting at a bar conversation and brainstorming. Not that it will happen.

Since everyone talks about an 8 team playoff ...

Thing is, as soon as we get an 8-team playoff, "everyone" will immediately start clamoring for a 16-team playoff, just like when we had the BCS, and there was big controversy over who should be #2, everyone would say "a four-team playoff would solve this and make everyone happy!"

Truth is, no playoff format will do that. We know this because the Big Dance has 68 freaking teams, and yet the entire month leading up to Selection Sunday is dominated by talk of "who is on the bubble" and as soon as the teams are selected, it's about "whose bubble burst", "who got robbed", etc.

It's really pointless. Think about it: The only sports where there is no controversy about who made the playoffs are sports in which there are no 'at large' bids, where every spot is determined by some formula that involves winning a division followed by formal tie-breakers.

As long as someone is going to be selected by humans, there will be controversy and unhappiness, no matter if the field is 4 teams or 400 teams.

And, the problems here for college football are too many teams and imbalanced scheduling. If you had a P4 and only counted P4 games, you could get to something close, where you could assign the same value to all P4 wins and P4 losses and use formal tie-breakers to determine CFP involvement. Until then, the beauty pageant continues.
12-11-2017 11:47 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Underdog Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,747
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation: 124
I Root For: The American
Location: Cloud Nine
Post: #12
RE: Okay, while we are waiting for bowl season. Does P12 and B10 push for power 4?
(12-11-2017 10:41 AM)goofus Wrote:  The best answer is for PAC and Big 12 to merge into 1 conference. But that would be too big with too much dead weight. So instead the 10 best schools from the PAC and 8 best schools from the Big 12 should leave to form a new 18-team western super conference.

Left out would be Wash St and Oregon St. from the PAC, who would be forced to join the MWC.

And West Virginia and Baylor from the Big 12 will be left out. WV because of geography and Baylor because of recent scandals. WV and Baylor will be forced to join the AAC.

To cut in front of the future B12 buffet line, the PAC 12 could invite 8 schools and rename itself “The Top 20”—which I highly doubt it would do…. Nevertheless, the “Top 20” could petition the NCAA to allow it to have 4 divisions of five schools. It could sell a percentage of the new TTN to ESPN. The PAC 12 needs the B12’s football craze fan-base and certain football brands to generate the kind of $$$ the BTN and SECN are making. In fact, the ACCN will eventually propel the ACC past the B12 financially in my opinion. Consequently, the PAC 12 and B12 could both benefit from some type of merger….
12-11-2017 11:51 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Attackcoog Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 44,834
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 2880
I Root For: Houston
Location:
Post: #13
RE: Okay, while we are waiting for bowl season. Does P12 and B10 push for power 4?
(12-10-2017 11:24 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(12-10-2017 06:34 PM)msm96wolf Wrote:  Again, this is more if sitting at a bar conversation and brainstorming. Not that it will happen.

Since everyone talks about an 8 team playoff ...

Thing is, as soon as we get an 8-team playoff, "everyone" will immediately start clamoring for a 16-team playoff, just like when we had the BCS, and there was big controversy over who should be #2, everyone would say "a four-team playoff would solve this and make everyone happy!"

Truth is, no playoff format will do that. We know this because the Big Dance has 68 freaking teams, and yet the entire month leading up to Selection Sunday is dominated by talk of "who is on the bubble" and as soon as the teams are selected, it's about "whose bubble burst", "who got robbed", etc.

It's really pointless. Think about it: The only sports where there is no controversy about who made the playoffs are sports in which there are no 'at large' bids, where every spot is determined by some formula that involves winning a division followed by formal tie-breakers.

As long as someone is going to be selected by humans, there will be controversy and unhappiness, no matter if the field is 4 teams or 400 teams.

Ehh. Here is the HUGE difference. In basketball there are something like 32 league champs. Every champ gets in. Thus, the debate is entirely about schools that were not good enough to win thier own conference. FBS only has 10 conferences. Really—you can get away with treating the five smaller conferences as one big conference.

This year the playoff left out 7 conference champs including an undefeated team. The current system is a joke.

An 8 team playoff gets the all 5 P5 champs, the top G5 champs, and 2 wildcards. There may be some that want a larger playoff—but such a set allows for every team to win thier way in with a second life for two deserving wildcards (highest ranked teams not in via auobid per the selection committee).
(This post was last modified: 12-11-2017 12:02 PM by Attackcoog.)
12-11-2017 11:55 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BePcr07 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,923
Joined: Dec 2015
Reputation: 356
I Root For: Boise St & Zags
Location:
Post: #14
RE: Okay, while we are waiting for bowl season. Does P12 and B10 push for power 4?
I am in support of the PAC doing a "power grab" of XII schools. I don't think they will but perhaps the XII jewels would be in support of it if they were given what they requested.

PAC
North: Washington, Washington St, Oregon, Oregon St, Utah, Colorado
West: Arizona, Arizona St, California, Stanford, USC, UCLA
Central: Texas, Texas Tech, Oklahoma, Oklahoma St, Kansas, Kansas St

SEC
West: TCU, Texas A&M, Arkansas, LSU
South: Mississippi, Mississippi St, Alabama, Auburn
North: Iowa St, Missouri, Kentucky, Vanderbilt
East: Tennessee, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida

ACC
South: Miami, Florida St, Georgia Tech, Clemson
East: North Carolina, North Carolina St, Duke, Wake Forest
North: Boston College, Syracuse, Pittsburgh, West Virginia
West: Virginia, Virginia Tech, Louisville, Cincinnati
12-11-2017 12:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JTApps1 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,960
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 144
I Root For: App State
Location:
Post: #15
RE: Okay, while we are waiting for bowl season. Does P12 and B10 push for power 4?
(12-10-2017 11:24 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(12-10-2017 06:34 PM)msm96wolf Wrote:  Again, this is more if sitting at a bar conversation and brainstorming. Not that it will happen.

Since everyone talks about an 8 team playoff ...

Thing is, as soon as we get an 8-team playoff, "everyone" will immediately start clamoring for a 16-team playoff, just like when we had the BCS, and there was big controversy over who should be #2, everyone would say "a four-team playoff would solve this and make everyone happy!"

Truth is, no playoff format will do that. We know this because the Big Dance has 68 freaking teams, and yet the entire month leading up to Selection Sunday is dominated by talk of "who is on the bubble" and as soon as the teams are selected, it's about "whose bubble burst", "who got robbed", etc.

It's really pointless. Think about it: The only sports where there is no controversy about who made the playoffs are sports in which there are no 'at large' bids, where every spot is determined by some formula that involves winning a division followed by formal tie-breakers.

As long as someone is going to be selected by humans, there will be controversy and unhappiness, no matter if the field is 4 teams or 400 teams.

We saw this in I-AA/FCS when App was there. It started out with a small field, but now has turned into a 24 team tournament. There was always someone "left out" no matter if there were 8, 16, or 20 teams in.
12-11-2017 01:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DavidSt Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 23,066
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 781
I Root For: ATU, P7
Location:
Post: #16
RE: Okay, while we are waiting for bowl season. Does P12 and B10 push for power 4?
Here is the problem. Both Texas and Oklahoma are looking eastward. That is where the viewership is right now. After that? PAC 12 will not invite any Big 12 schools. They will look into the MWC to go to 16. As for the commish's of both PAC 12 and SEC? They have been saying a school like Boise State should be part of the Power Conferences for the SoS issue. I think that is what people forget on this board when they come up with this stupid P4 conferences. There will always be a P5, and the Big 12 is the place that needs to expand. The Big 12 are idiots for not grabbing the hot schools out there last year. They will always lose out on the long run if they do not expand.
12-11-2017 03:35 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Big Frog II Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,019
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 116
I Root For: TCU
Location:
Post: #17
RE: Okay, while we are waiting for bowl season. Does P12 and B10 push for power 4?
(12-11-2017 03:35 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  Here is the problem. Both Texas and Oklahoma are looking eastward. That is where the viewership is right now. After that? PAC 12 will not invite any Big 12 schools. They will look into the MWC to go to 16. As for the commish's of both PAC 12 and SEC? They have been saying a school like Boise State should be part of the Power Conferences for the SoS issue. I think that is what people forget on this board when they come up with this stupid P4 conferences. There will always be a P5, and the Big 12 is the place that needs to expand. The Big 12 are idiots for not grabbing the hot schools out there last year. They will always lose out on the long run if they do not expand.

Those "hot schools" are still there. They can wait until the TV rights are up again in 2024. Those "hot schools" will still be there.
12-11-2017 05:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
quo vadis Online
Legend
*

Posts: 50,149
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2417
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
Post: #18
RE: Okay, while we are waiting for bowl season. Does P12 and B10 push for power 4?
(12-11-2017 11:55 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  
(12-10-2017 11:24 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(12-10-2017 06:34 PM)msm96wolf Wrote:  Again, this is more if sitting at a bar conversation and brainstorming. Not that it will happen.

Since everyone talks about an 8 team playoff ...

Thing is, as soon as we get an 8-team playoff, "everyone" will immediately start clamoring for a 16-team playoff, just like when we had the BCS, and there was big controversy over who should be #2, everyone would say "a four-team playoff would solve this and make everyone happy!"

Truth is, no playoff format will do that. We know this because the Big Dance has 68 freaking teams, and yet the entire month leading up to Selection Sunday is dominated by talk of "who is on the bubble" and as soon as the teams are selected, it's about "whose bubble burst", "who got robbed", etc.

It's really pointless. Think about it: The only sports where there is no controversy about who made the playoffs are sports in which there are no 'at large' bids, where every spot is determined by some formula that involves winning a division followed by formal tie-breakers.

As long as someone is going to be selected by humans, there will be controversy and unhappiness, no matter if the field is 4 teams or 400 teams.

Ehh. Here is the HUGE difference. In basketball there are something like 32 league champs. Every champ gets in. Thus, the debate is entirely about schools that were not good enough to win thier own conference. FBS only has 10 conferences. Really—you can get away with treating the five smaller conferences as one big conference.

This year the playoff left out 7 conference champs including an undefeated team. The current system is a joke.

An 8 team playoff gets the all 5 P5 champs, the top G5 champs, and 2 wildcards. There may be some that want a larger playoff—but such a set allows for every team to win thier way in with a second life for two deserving wildcards (highest ranked teams not in via auobid per the selection committee).

It doesn't allow every team to win their way in. A committee is going to have to choose who the best G5 team is.

Also, the current system is viewed as a 'joke' by basically ... nobody. Even Ohio State hasn't raised a ruckus about the selection. As has been the case the past four years, there is zero doubt that whoever wins the playoff will be viewed as the legitimate national champ by everyone.
12-11-2017 07:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fighting Muskie Online
Senior Chief Realignmentologist
*

Posts: 11,891
Joined: Sep 2016
Reputation: 807
I Root For: Ohio St, UC,MAC
Location: Biden Cesspool
Post: #19
RE: Okay, while we are waiting for bowl season. Does P12 and B10 push for power 4?
The Fate of the Big 12 rests in the hands of Oklahoma--they are the ones who will be the catalysts for change and any subsequent moves will be reactionary.

If Texas switches conferences it will be a result of Oklahoma deflating the value of the league to the point that it's untenable. I could also see Texas leverage the post-Oklahoma Big 12 to retain the tv rights to all of their home games. The other 7 would probably have no choice but to take that deal.
12-11-2017 07:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Section 200 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 658
Joined: Oct 2007
Reputation: 57
I Root For: UC & XU
Location:
Post: #20
RE: Okay, while we are waiting for bowl season. Does P12 and B10 push for power 4?
Oklahoma will need to move - but the only logical move is to the SEC. No other conference works. Texas goes where ever and the rest are left behind. The other 8 schools really have no value.
12-11-2017 09:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.