Wow, that was an ugly and dirty hit by FAU. So uncalled for.

That was a cheap shot and a half.

(12-19-2017 07:40 PM)TodgeRodge Wrote:  CEO of Cheribundi is named Steve Pear...

And that dude look less than thrilled. Who the hell approved that commercial? You'd think they would have had him redo it.

One of the dumbest plays I've ever seen. Had then stopped! What an idiot

FAU playing thug ball. Not cool...

How was that not targeting? I guess I don't understand targeting.

Wow! Good fortune for FAU!

What a dirty, uncalled for hit by FAU. And no targeting, late hit? Amazing.

Not targeting? Umm okay. FAU catches a break.

(12-19-2017 07:46 PM)MidnightBlueGold Wrote:  

(12-19-2017 07:40 PM)TodgeRodge Wrote:  CEO of Cheribundi is named Steve Pear...

And that dude look less than thrilled. Who the hell approved that commercial? You'd think they would have had him redo it.

they used the same guys that did Kiffin's video

(12-19-2017 06:22 PM)Boca Rocket Wrote:  

(12-19-2017 05:45 PM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(12-19-2017 05:22 PM)Boca Rocket Wrote:  

(12-19-2017 03:46 PM)thefaU Wrote:  

(12-19-2017 03:29 PM)KAjunRaider Wrote:  What is the weather looking like for this evening in Boca ?

Do you all think a lot of locals (non-FAU) will come out ?

It'll be a cold December 74° at kickoff.

Not a bad evening to enjoy a football game.

And I could see a lot of younger, non-FAU affiliated locals come out. We've never experienced this before, so we'll have to see what the turnout is like.

Traffic is crazy over on Glades Rd. This is a perfect night for football in South Florida.

Take Spanish river..

Actually I usually take Dixie to 20th. The Irishmen should jammed after the game.

Nice! I miss Boca!

wtf was the fau d back doing....how that doesn't fall under the definition of targeting is beyond me.....

the cheerleader's O mouth said it all......

fau got away with one there.....

FAU stomping it flat in this drive

(12-19-2017 07:47 PM)banker Wrote:  How was that not targeting? I guess I don't understand targeting.

Led with the shoulder to the chest. Helmet contact was incidental.

That was never targeting under the rules, and it was a correct overturn. Announcers were blind to the replay not to have at least questioned the call before the overturn.

Having said that, it was a DUMB late hit.

(12-19-2017 07:46 PM)banker Wrote:  That was a cheap shot and a half.

They're cheapshotting Akron's QB every time they tackle him. It's not good football. Makes me root for Akron. Get the guy down, get off him, and reset for next play. Anything else is bush league.

(12-19-2017 07:50 PM)FriscoDawg Wrote:  

(12-19-2017 07:47 PM)banker Wrote:  How was that not targeting? I guess I don't understand targeting.

Led with the shoulder to the chest. Helmet contact was incidental.

That was never targeting under the rules, and it was a correct overturn. Announcers were blind to the replay not to have at least questioned the call before the overturn.

really.....so 4 extra steps doesn't fall under that rule.......

therefore, the rule itself is ******* retarded.....

he launched with momentum and intent to kill......

ummmmmmmmmmkay.......another stupid rule.......ranks right up there with what a ******* catch is.....

(12-19-2017 07:51 PM)MUther Wrote:  

(12-19-2017 07:46 PM)banker Wrote:  That was a cheap shot and a half.

They're cheapshotting Akron's QB every time they tackle him. It's not good football. Makes me root for Akron. Get the guy down, get off him, and reset for next play. Anything else is bush league.

agree.....he's going down to the ground as fast as he can.....

(12-19-2017 07:50 PM)FriscoDawg Wrote:  

(12-19-2017 07:47 PM)banker Wrote:  How was that not targeting? I guess I don't understand targeting.

Led with the shoulder to the chest. Helmet contact was incidental.

That was never targeting under the rules, and it was a correct overturn. Announcers were blind to the replay not to have at least questioned the call before the overturn.

Having said that, it was a DUMB late hit.

.
They need to revisit the targeting rules after the season. Many of the targeting calls were so much more docile than that hit. I know leading with the helmet is the key but it needs at least two variations.

Sunbelt crew lol, how in the world was that not targeting?

(12-19-2017 07:53 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(12-19-2017 07:50 PM)FriscoDawg Wrote:  

(12-19-2017 07:47 PM)banker Wrote:  How was that not targeting? I guess I don't understand targeting.

Led with the shoulder to the chest. Helmet contact was incidental.

That was never targeting under the rules, and it was a correct overturn. Announcers were blind to the replay not to have at least questioned the call before the overturn.

really.....so 4 extra steps doesn't fall under that rule.......

therefore, the rule itself is ******* retarded.....

he launched with momentum and intent to kill......

ummmmmmmmmmkay.......another stupid rule.......ranks right up there with what a ******* catch is.....

Primary point of contact was to the chest with the shoulder. It was not a forceable hit aimed at the head or neck area, and the hit wasn't with the crown of the helmet. The elements for targeting just weren't there despite what the TV commentators with an agenda want you to believe.