(12-06-2017 01:44 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  So far it seems the only answers attempted are.

1- Claiming the multiple accusers are liars while also ignoring the other multitude of facts, including Moores own statements, which show a pattern of him pursuing teens when he was 30+ years old.

2- A Democrat is worse than an adult who preys on young teen girls.

Hope none of you have any teen girls, because I can guarantee any of your neighbors who might be interested sure are getting your message loud and clear.

or 3 - People are innocent until proven guilty...

Has he even been charged with anything?

(12-06-2017 02:02 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:44 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  So far it seems the only answers attempted are.

1- Claiming the multiple accusers are liars while also ignoring the other multitude of facts, including Moores own statements, which show a pattern of him pursuing teens when he was 30+ years old.

2- A Democrat is worse than an adult who preys on young teen girls.

Hope none of you have any teen girls, because I can guarantee any of your neighbors who might be interested sure are getting your message loud and clear.

or 3 - People are innocent until proven guilty...

Has he even been charged with anything?

Try reading the thread, that has already been answered.

(12-06-2017 02:03 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 02:02 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:44 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  So far it seems the only answers attempted are.

1- Claiming the multiple accusers are liars while also ignoring the other multitude of facts, including Moores own statements, which show a pattern of him pursuing teens when he was 30+ years old.

2- A Democrat is worse than an adult who preys on young teen girls.

Hope none of you have any teen girls, because I can guarantee any of your neighbors who might be interested sure are getting your message loud and clear.

or 3 - People are innocent until proven guilty...

Has he even been charged with anything?

Try reading the thread, that has already been answered.

Not going back 5 pages... If you say it's been proven then I'll take your word for it..

It has been proven right?

(12-06-2017 01:50 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:47 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:39 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:38 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:30 PM)VA49er Wrote:  Has he been proven guilty of anything?

Roy Moore has not been proven guilty.

Doug Jones is a proven socialist.

If you don't vote in Alabama, we don't care what you think

That's irrelevant to my question, why is the GOP donating money to a person credibly accused of sexually assaulting teens as a 30+ year old, especially after he's clearly lied about his contact with and knowledge of the accused?

Because they are not credible. I don't accept the premise that you assert.

It's been discussed ad nauseam. I can't help you if you don't understand by now. I am beginning to think you don't have the mental capacity to comprehend the basic requirements needed to make an argument.

What would you consider a credible accusation of similar claims? What other evidence would you expect to have?

Furthermore, what evidence do you have that their claim is not credible?

I really don't care what you think. I don't like being rude. It's just that simple. I'll put you on ignore.

Neither has Hillary Clinton nor Donald Trump been charged yet the board is frothing over those 2.

(12-06-2017 02:07 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  Neither has Hillary Clinton nor Donald Trump been charged yet the board is frothing over those 2.

Well tell us...is Moore a proven liar?

You are the board expert on proven liars.

(12-06-2017 01:39 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  That's irrelevant to my question, why is the GOP donating money to a person credibly [b]accused[b] of sexually assaulting teens as a 30+ year old, especially after he's clearly lied about his contact with and knowledge of the accused?

Again... in which dictionary does _accused_ and _guilty_ mean the same thing? No I'd seriously like to know.. and have a talk with any school system that uses that dictionary and just ask them how stupid are their students when they're 'allowed' to graduate?

(12-06-2017 02:07 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:50 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:47 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:39 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:38 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Roy Moore has not been proven guilty.

Doug Jones is a proven socialist.

If you don't vote in Alabama, we don't care what you think

That's irrelevant to my question, why is the GOP donating money to a person credibly accused of sexually assaulting teens as a 30+ year old, especially after he's clearly lied about his contact with and knowledge of the accused?

Because they are not credible. I don't accept the premise that you assert.

It's been discussed ad nauseam. I can't help you if you don't understand by now. I am beginning to think you don't have the mental capacity to comprehend the basic requirements needed to make an argument.

What would you consider a credible accusation of similar claims? What other evidence would you expect to have?

Furthermore, what evidence do you have that their claim is not credible?

I really don't care what you think. I don't like being rude. It's just that simple. I'll put you on ignore.

Aww, poor little snowflake doesn't like his opinions being challenged. Better go put those blinders on, or else you might have to come to terms with the fact you're backing a person who almost certainly sexually assaulted young teens as a 30 year old man.

(12-06-2017 03:49 PM)DaSaintFan Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:39 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  That's irrelevant to my question, why is the GOP donating money to a person credibly [b]accused[b] of sexually assaulting teens as a 30+ year old, especially after he's clearly lied about his contact with and knowledge of the accused?

Again... in which dictionary does _accused_ and _guilty_ mean the same thing? No I'd seriously like to know.. and have a talk with any school system that uses that dictionary and just ask them how stupid are their students when they're 'allowed' to graduate?

Where have I used the word guilty and accused interchangeably? Just because someone is accused of an action doesn't inherently mean they are guilty, but to act as if one cannot assert the likelihood of guilt based on the number, the nature, and the supporting evidence of those accusations is patently ludicrous. Weinstein has literally only been accused at this point, I didn't see you on that thread making similar posts.

Must be that magic ®.

(12-06-2017 02:04 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 02:03 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 02:02 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:44 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  So far it seems the only answers attempted are.

1- Claiming the multiple accusers are liars while also ignoring the other multitude of facts, including Moores own statements, which show a pattern of him pursuing teens when he was 30+ years old.

2- A Democrat is worse than an adult who preys on young teen girls.

Hope none of you have any teen girls, because I can guarantee any of your neighbors who might be interested sure are getting your message loud and clear.

or 3 - People are innocent until proven guilty...

Has he even been charged with anything?

Try reading the thread, that has already been answered.

Not going back 5 pages... If you say it's been proven then I'll take your word for it..

It has been proven right?

How dare I expect you to read the thread you're commenting on, what an absurd notion!

He literally cannot be charged because the statute of limitations has passed, so asking if he's been charged is idiotic. Now, is there anything else I can explain for you?

(12-06-2017 04:33 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 02:04 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 02:03 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 02:02 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 01:44 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  So far it seems the only answers attempted are.

1- Claiming the multiple accusers are liars while also ignoring the other multitude of facts, including Moores own statements, which show a pattern of him pursuing teens when he was 30+ years old.

2- A Democrat is worse than an adult who preys on young teen girls.

Hope none of you have any teen girls, because I can guarantee any of your neighbors who might be interested sure are getting your message loud and clear.

or 3 - People are innocent until proven guilty...

Has he even been charged with anything?

Try reading the thread, that has already been answered.

Not going back 5 pages... If you say it's been proven then I'll take your word for it..

It has been proven right?

How dare I expect you to read the thread you're commenting on, what an absurd notion!

He literally cannot be charged because the statute of limitations has passed, so asking if he's been charged is idiotic. Now, is there anything else I can explain for you?

That sounds like a load of Bill Jizzle.

Did Jerry Seinfeld get dragged this much when he was 39 and dating/having sex with 17 year old Soshanna Lonstein?
Have these women said they had sex with Moore?

(12-06-2017 04:35 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 04:33 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 02:04 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 02:03 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 02:02 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  or 3 - People are innocent until proven guilty...

Has he even been charged with anything?

Try reading the thread, that has already been answered.

Not going back 5 pages... If you say it's been proven then I'll take your word for it..

It has been proven right?

How dare I expect you to read the thread you're commenting on, what an absurd notion!

He literally cannot be charged because the statute of limitations has passed, so asking if he's been charged is idiotic. Now, is there anything else I can explain for you?

That sounds like a load of Bill Jizzle.

Well you could use google on the very machine you're posting this to find out if it is instead of posting this, but don't take my word for it.

http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2017/11...ate_1.html

(12-06-2017 04:38 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Did Jerry Seinfeld get dragged this much when he was 39 and dating/having sex with 17 year old Soshanna Lonstein?
Have these women said they had sex with Moore?

Nope, he just stripped and fondled a 14 year old.

(12-06-2017 04:42 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 04:38 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Did Jerry Seinfeld get dragged this much when he was 39 and dating/having sex with 17 year old Soshanna Lonstein?
Have these women said they had sex with Moore?

Nope, he just stripped and fondled a 14 year old.

You have no proof and that is the worse allegation? Really that is all there is.

(12-06-2017 04:50 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 04:42 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 04:38 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Did Jerry Seinfeld get dragged this much when he was 39 and dating/having sex with 17 year old Soshanna Lonstein?
Have these women said they had sex with Moore?

Nope, he just stripped and fondled a 14 year old.

You have no proof and that is the worse allegation? Really that is all there is.

I wonder if the people so quick to believe allegations like this dont actually feel guilty for having committed the same crimes themselves. You know like liars who always assume other people are lying. Makes you wonder doesnt it. Im pretty sure im going to assume all those that believe unproven allegations are pretty much guilty of committing the same crime. Shame on them.

(12-06-2017 04:50 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 04:42 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 04:38 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Did Jerry Seinfeld get dragged this much when he was 39 and dating/having sex with 17 year old Soshanna Lonstein?
Have these women said they had sex with Moore?

Nope, he just stripped and fondled a 14 year old.

You have no proof and that is the worse allegation? Really that is all there is.

Well we have signed photos, we know Moore has lied about his association with two of the women, Moore himself admitted to dating high school teens during that period, we have witnesses who support these women's claims, and we know Moore himself admits to first "noticing" his wife as a 15 year old when he was 30.

I mean this genuinely, what other proof would you expect to exist given the accusations?

(12-06-2017 04:59 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 04:50 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 04:42 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 04:38 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Did Jerry Seinfeld get dragged this much when he was 39 and dating/having sex with 17 year old Soshanna Lonstein?
Have these women said they had sex with Moore?

Nope, he just stripped and fondled a 14 year old.

You have no proof and that is the worse allegation? Really that is all there is.

I wonder if the people so quick to believe allegations like this dont actually feel guilty for having committed the same crimes themselves. You know like liars who always assume other people are lying. Makes you wonder doesnt it. Im pretty sure im going to assume all those that believe unproven allegations are pretty much guilty of committing the same crime. Shame on them.

I think it's probably more rational to worry that those people belittling the alleged victims and minimizing the alleged sexual assault of young teens have skeletons in their closet.

(12-06-2017 05:05 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 04:50 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 04:42 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 04:38 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Did Jerry Seinfeld get dragged this much when he was 39 and dating/having sex with 17 year old Soshanna Lonstein?
Have these women said they had sex with Moore?

Nope, he just stripped and fondled a 14 year old.

You have no proof and that is the worse allegation? Really that is all there is.

Well we have signed photos, we know Moore has lied about his association with two of the women, Moore himself admitted to dating high school teens during that period, we have witnesses who support these women's claims, and we know Moore himself admits to first "noticing" his wife as a 15 year old when he was 30.

I mean this genuinely, what other proof would you expect to exist given the accusations?

Is any of that illegal? No accusations since he has been married. Seinfeld was 39 popping a 17 a year old, openly dating her.

(12-06-2017 04:33 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 02:04 PM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  Not going back 5 pages... If you say it's been proven then I'll take your word for it..

It has been proven right?

How dare I expect you to read the thread you're commenting on, what an absurd notion!

He literally cannot be charged because the statute of limitations has passed, so asking if he's been charged is idiotic. Now, is there anything else I can explain for you?

I didn't say he's been charged or not... I asked if it's been proven beyond a he said / she said scenario..

You know, like pictures of Franken grabbing a sleeping womans chest.