So what did Gowdy have to say?

(12-05-2017 04:16 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 04:07 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 03:45 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 02:47 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

Quote:Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton called the new Weissmann document an “astonishing and disturbing find.”

“Andrew Weisman, a key prosecutor on Robert Mueller’s team, praised Obama DOJ holdover Sally Yates after she lawlessly thwarted President Trump,” he said in a statement. “How much more evidence do we need that the Mueller operation has been irredeemably compromised by anti-Trump partisans?”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/...proud.html

So now simply praising anyone who disagrees with Trump means you're "irredeemably compromised"?

Jesus Christ, this is downright scary that you guys aren't seeing this for what it transparently is; a concerted effort to discredit any investigation into Trump by labeling anyone but the most transparent sycophants "compromised". Everyone here, including those of you who support Trump, have almost assuredly have made comments criticizing something he's done. Simply sending texts saying you disagree with the guy or agree with someone who's opposed to him isn't evidence of a falsification of evidence or proof the entire investigation is a partisan hackjob. Mueller is a lifelong republican, a f*cking veteran, and has spent his life serving our nation with integrity, but Trump complains about him and instantly none of that matters because he's compromised?

How many of his staff have been revealed to be Trump cheerleaders?

No idea, but it shouldn't matter on either end. The facts will rest on their merits, and unless you find that evidence was falsified or laws broken, you can't design an investigatory team based on their loyalty to the accused. I find it hard to believe I'm having to explain this to other Americans, but, here we are.

Roy Moore agrees with you

(12-05-2017 04:34 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 04:16 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 04:07 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 03:45 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 02:47 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

So now simply praising anyone who disagrees with Trump means you're "irredeemably compromised"?

Jesus Christ, this is downright scary that you guys aren't seeing this for what it transparently is; a concerted effort to discredit any investigation into Trump by labeling anyone but the most transparent sycophants "compromised". Everyone here, including those of you who support Trump, have almost assuredly have made comments criticizing something he's done. Simply sending texts saying you disagree with the guy or agree with someone who's opposed to him isn't evidence of a falsification of evidence or proof the entire investigation is a partisan hackjob. Mueller is a lifelong republican, a f*cking veteran, and has spent his life serving our nation with integrity, but Trump complains about him and instantly none of that matters because he's compromised?

How many of his staff have been revealed to be Trump cheerleaders?

No idea, but it shouldn't matter on either end. The facts will rest on their merits, and unless you find that evidence was falsified or laws broken, you can't design an investigatory team based on their loyalty to the accused. I find it hard to believe I'm having to explain this to other Americans, but, here we are.

Roy Moore agrees with you

The guy who lied about the women accusing him of sexually assaulting them when they were teens? What's he got to do with this?

(12-05-2017 02:55 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  The tears of losers tastes so sweet.

What?


Is there just so much #winning that you simply can't keep up?

(12-05-2017 02:55 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  The tears of losers tastes so sweet.

Trump Won, Republicans won, America Won !

Mueller deputy praised DOJ official after she defied Trump travel ban order: 'I am so proud'



http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/...proud.html

(12-05-2017 05:14 PM)CardFan1 Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 02:55 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  The tears of losers tastes so sweet.

Trump Won, Republicans won, America Won !

the 'bizzle is lost in the translation in transition....

it's too dayum funny......

(12-05-2017 04:16 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Close to 70% of the country pretty much hates the guy...what do you expect?

Keep on keeping on and that will chance. All this Russia nonsense and all the constant MSM hate and all the constant liberal wackoism is making more and more people that did not vote for Trump actually defend the guy. Come next election, if he runs, those people will more than likely vote for Trump.

The left's visceral, irrational hatred of all things Trump has no parallel in my mind--except the right's visceral, irrational hatred of all things Clinton.

(12-06-2017 09:17 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  The left's visceral, irrational hatred of all things Trump has no parallel in my mind--except the right's visceral, rational hatred of all things Clinton.

FIFY. Hillary is evil and corrupt.

(12-05-2017 03:36 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 02:57 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 02:55 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  The tears of losers tastes so sweet.

Your team lost though.

It's not a team sport.

Of course it is, it's your team against the world. As long as your team wins that's all that matters, screw the other half. How's that working out for your team anyway?

(12-05-2017 04:16 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Close to 70% of the country pretty much hates the guy...what do you expect?

Source?

(12-06-2017 09:28 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 04:16 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Close to 70% of the country pretty much hates the guy...what do you expect?

Source?

His source is the same people who predicted Hillary winning 350 electoral votes.

(12-06-2017 09:49 AM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(12-06-2017 09:28 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 04:16 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Close to 70% of the country pretty much hates the guy...what do you expect?

Source?

His source is the same people who predicted Hillary winning 350 electoral votes.

roger that