Brought to you by none other than Peter Strzok.

Quote:Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey's earlier draft language describing Clinton's actions as "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," the source said.

The shift from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," which may appear pedestrian at first glance, reflected a decision by the FBI that could have had potentially significant legal implications, as the federal law governing the mishandling of classified material establishes criminal penalties for "gross negligence."

Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, raised questions over why the change was made after receiving documents from the FBI last month, but the identity of who was behind the edit has not been reported until now.

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/12/04/politi...index.html

Isn't that sweet.

(12-04-2017 04:51 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  Brought to you by none other than Peter Strzok.

Quote:Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey's earlier draft language describing Clinton's actions as "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," the source said.

The shift from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," which may appear pedestrian at first glance, reflected a decision by the FBI that could have had potentially significant legal implications, as the federal law governing the mishandling of classified material establishes criminal penalties for "gross negligence."

Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, raised questions over why the change was made after receiving documents from the FBI last month, but the identity of who was behind the edit has not been reported until now.

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/12/04/politi...index.html

Isn't that sweet.

Yes. Very cute.

Grossly negligent is, from my pedestrian understanding, the very threshold for violation of the blah, blah statute or however it's framed.

IOW's illegal.

Lock her up!

They literally have no choice but to reopen this case. It is out of the FBI’s hands now.

Guys c'mon he was probably using a cell phone.

Y'all know how that auto correct changes things

Though a reliable source has told us that Mueller's team doesn't leak, they sure are looking less and less professional with each new revelation.

(12-04-2017 04:51 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  Brought to you by none other than Peter Strzok.

Quote:Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey's earlier draft language describing Clinton's actions as "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," the source said.

The shift from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," which may appear pedestrian at first glance, reflected a decision by the FBI that could have had potentially significant legal implications, as the federal law governing the mishandling of classified material establishes criminal penalties for "gross negligence."

Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, raised questions over why the change was made after receiving documents from the FBI last month, but the identity of who was behind the edit has not been reported until now.

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/12/04/politi...index.html

Isn't that sweet.

Good Lord. This is pure craziness. If ever Mueller wanted to prosecute something with teeth, here it is.

If any one is going to have to flip it's going to be this Strzok guy

(12-04-2017 05:28 PM)solohawks Wrote:  Guys c'mon he was probably using a cell phone.

Y'all know how that auto correct changes things

you're talking about the kind drug dealers use, eh?

nobody could be stupid enough to keep a server that gets wiped with some traceable bleaching agent....

never mind......how stupid of me.....

the dippos can't get in their way fast enough.....

dippo mantra......."hey look at me, I'm a ******* dumbarse"

(12-04-2017 05:53 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 04:51 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  Brought to you by none other than Peter Strzok.

Quote:Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey's earlier draft language describing Clinton's actions as "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," the source said.

The shift from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," which may appear pedestrian at first glance, reflected a decision by the FBI that could have had potentially significant legal implications, as the federal law governing the mishandling of classified material establishes criminal penalties for "gross negligence."

Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, raised questions over why the change was made after receiving documents from the FBI last month, but the identity of who was behind the edit has not been reported until now.

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/12/04/politi...index.html

Isn't that sweet.

Good Lord. This is pure craziness. If ever Mueller wanted to prosecute something with teeth, here it is.

at least Lerch fired his arse.....

'course, I'm certain he knows what's coming down the road.....

what a ******* joke....

not a soul saw this coming.....

(12-04-2017 04:51 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  Brought to you by none other than Peter Strzok.

Quote:Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey's earlier draft language describing Clinton's actions as "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," the source said.

The shift from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," which may appear pedestrian at first glance, reflected a decision by the FBI that could have had potentially significant legal implications, as the federal law governing the mishandling of classified material establishes criminal penalties for "gross negligence."

Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, raised questions over why the change was made after receiving documents from the FBI last month, but the identity of who was behind the edit has not been reported until now.

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/12/04/politi...index.html

Isn't that sweet.

Peter Strzok... isn't he one of the guys from The Monkees?

For those that blew the board grief with regards to comey’s utter misreading of the statutes and fabricating the intent element. Please feel free to chime in. Wonder if this came up in between discussing golf and grandkids on the tarmac with Bubba?

Forget the head, this entire fish was rotten from the start.

(12-04-2017 06:46 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  For those that blew the board grief with regards to comey’s utter misreading of the statutes and fabricating the intent element. Please feel free to chime in. Wonder if this came up in between discussing golf and grandkids on the tarmac with Bubba?

Forget the head, this entire fish was rotten from the start.

they won't b/c the can't.....they'll simply crawl back into their corner and make another attempt to pounce on the next bs.....

it's all they have 'left'.... pounce/lose pounce/lose pounce lose......and on and on...

we can only hope the dippos continue forward with dippo logic.....

Think about it...

for all the winning we see, they get nothing but losing.

At some point it's got to be demoralizing beyond the point of return.

The FBI needs a good housecleaning and I think I know someone who's up to the task.

(12-04-2017 06:46 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  For those that blew the board grief with regards to comey’s utter misreading of the statutes and fabricating the intent element. Please feel free to chime in. Wonder if this came up in between discussing golf and grandkids on the tarmac with Bubba?

Forget the head, this entire fish was rotten from the start.

So what are you going to say when she's still not being prosecuted?

(12-04-2017 07:33 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 06:46 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  For those that blew the board grief with regards to comey’s utter misreading of the statutes and fabricating the intent element. Please feel free to chime in. Wonder if this came up in between discussing golf and grandkids on the tarmac with Bubba?

Forget the head, this entire fish was rotten from the start.

So what are you going to say when she's still not being prosecuted?

I'd say it appears there are two sets of laws, those that apply to the little people and those apply to the DC power brokers.

Quote:OCTOBER 11, 2016 By Devin Watkins
Last week, a person was arrested for allegedly having classified documents at home without authorization. No, it wasn’t Hillary Clinton—but it makes you wonder, why not?

Police executed a warrant to search Harold Thomas Martin III’s home and found classified documents. Did police execute a warrant to search Clinton’s home? No, of course not.

http://thefederalist.com/2016/10/11/man-...n-in-jail/

Quote:Several people have been punished for a similar or lesser offense than what Hillary Clinton is getting away with — being “extremely careless” in handling “very sensitive, highly classified information,” as FBI Director James Comey has said.
In announcing that the FBI will not recommend charges in the Clinton email scandal, Comey appeared to suggest that if someone other than the Democratic presidential nominee mishandles classified information, that person would be punished.

“To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences,” he conceded. “To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions.”

http://www.breitbart.com/national-securi...l-offense/

If you wish to characterize it another way, have a stab. There's a list of 10 persons who have been punished for a similar or lesser offense than what Clinton did in that second link.

Lol. Months later this child keeps responding to me...the only way I see his prattle is if you guys quote his posts.

What's the statute of limitations on this crime? We'll still be arguing over it and Killery will probably be long gone and buried...if we're lucky.

(12-04-2017 06:24 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 05:53 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 04:51 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  Brought to you by none other than Peter Strzok.

Quote:Electronic records show Peter Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server as the No. 2 official in the counterintelligence division, changed Comey's earlier draft language describing Clinton's actions as "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," the source said.

The shift from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless," which may appear pedestrian at first glance, reflected a decision by the FBI that could have had potentially significant legal implications, as the federal law governing the mishandling of classified material establishes criminal penalties for "gross negligence."

Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, raised questions over why the change was made after receiving documents from the FBI last month, but the identity of who was behind the edit has not been reported until now.

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/12/04/politi...index.html

Isn't that sweet.

Good Lord. This is pure craziness. If ever Mueller wanted to prosecute something with teeth, here it is.

at least Lerch fired his arse.....

'course, I'm certain he knows what's coming down the road.....

what a ******* joke....

not a soul saw this coming.....

Except “they” didn’t fire him.

#2 guy in his department has been “reassigned”.

So this naked partisan hack is now likely pulling down the same 150,000 a year (?) pushing pencils around his desk with the 22 YO NoVa grad G-3’s making 25,367 a year.

Nice work if you can get it, I guess.

Swampity swamp swamp swamp...