Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Anyone find it silly that conferences without divisions...
Author Message
BruceMcF Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,003
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 102
I Root For: Reds/Buckeyes/.
Location:
Post: #21
RE: Anyone find it silly that conferences without divisions...
Pragmatically, you can't have a tie-breaker game that you skip if the champion is unambiguous. So as long as there is good reason to have the game in a number of seasons, it's six of one & half a dozen of the other whether you have it or not ... in some years, it will be "silly" to have it, in some years it will be "silly" to not have it.

Given that it risks being silly either way, I'd say go with the one that earns the most money for the conference.

(12-02-2017 08:31 PM)RUScarlets Wrote:  There could be a three way tie as well, in which case you'd have to remove a team based on point differentials or whatever the tie breaker is.

I don't like H2H either because the winning team may have had homefield advantage in that regular season game.

It's better having a game, but they'd be better off adding at least one more team and two teams and two divisions and go to an 8 game conference schedule. More quality OOC games is better.
Why would you assume the additional OOC games will be quality games?
(This post was last modified: 12-02-2017 08:50 PM by BruceMcF.)
12-02-2017 08:49 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RUScarlets Online
1st String
*

Posts: 1,792
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 15
I Root For: Rutgers
Location:
Post: #22
RE: Anyone find it silly that conferences without divisions...
Well playing 8 conf games gives a higher probability of avoiding a rematch in the CCG by default. Only take a game out if you schedule P5 OOC and not pull an SEC pre rivalry weekend.

I don't know what's going to happen this year. I think Bama's OOC is decent this year but they play that crap FCS game pre rivalry weekend and it may cost them.

3 quality OOCs should be required for P5 conferences only playing 8 conf games.
12-02-2017 09:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
esayem Offline
Hark The Sound!
*

Posts: 3,974
Joined: Feb 2007
Reputation: 119
I Root For: The Heels
Location: Tobacco Road
Post: #23
RE: Anyone find it silly that conferences without divisions...
I think conferences shouldn’t be forced to have divisions if they have 12 teams. How dumb is that rule when 10 team conferences can reap the benefits?

The ACC could settle a lot of scheduling issues by not being forced to have divisions. Ultimately, divisions create fabricated yearly bouts like Texas A&M-South Carolina and Louisville-Virginia. It would have benefitted the old Big XII by allowing Oklahoma and Nebraska to play every year. All the Cali schools in the Pac 12 could go back to playing each other yearly as well.

The old school 12 team SEC (with GT and Tulane) didn’t have divisions and they were fine.

The only good thing about divisions is that it eliminates a back to back repeat game.
(This post was last modified: 12-02-2017 09:29 PM by esayem.)
12-02-2017 09:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ken d Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,915
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 289
I Root For: college sports
Location: Raleigh
Post: #24
RE: Anyone find it silly that conferences without divisions...
(12-02-2017 06:46 PM)_C2_ Wrote:  Well of course I have no say in it. It doesn't make it any less silly.

Is it any sillier than the six other conferences which have rematches in their championship games?
12-02-2017 09:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DavidSt Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,872
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 79
I Root For: ATU, P7
Location:
Post: #25
RE: Anyone find it silly that conferences without divisions...
The question is this. Who would win the Big 12 Championship this year if it was between Oklahoma Vs UCF? What if UCF pulled of the victory over Oklahoma?
12-02-2017 09:39 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
_C2_ Offline
The King of Overanalysis
*

Posts: 17,248
Joined: Feb 2008
Reputation: 349
I Root For: Houston
Location: Near Seawall Town
Post: #26
RE: Anyone find it silly that conferences without divisions...
@ken_d

At least they're split into divisions, thus both winners didn't play roughly the same schedule. The idea of conference championship games is dumb anyways. It was a genius ploy by Roy Kramer a quarter century ago but overall a bad idea, whether it's good made-for-TV or not.
(This post was last modified: 12-02-2017 09:57 PM by _C2_.)
12-02-2017 09:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MWC Tex Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,625
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 112
I Root For: MW
Location: TX
Post: #27
RE: Anyone find it silly that conferences without divisions...
(12-02-2017 09:21 PM)RUScarlets Wrote:  Well playing 8 conf games gives a higher probability of avoiding a rematch in the CCG by default. Only take a game out if you schedule P5 OOC and not pull an SEC pre rivalry weekend.

I don't know what's going to happen this year. I think Bama's OOC is decent this year but they play that crap FCS game pre rivalry weekend and it may cost them.

3 quality OOCs should be required for P5 conferences only playing 8 conf games.

Alabama played Fresno St and Colorado st. CSU did decent but Fresno is #25 and currently winng the MW championship game.
(This post was last modified: 12-02-2017 10:03 PM by MWC Tex.)
12-02-2017 10:01 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ken d Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,915
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 289
I Root For: college sports
Location: Raleigh
Post: #28
RE: Anyone find it silly that conferences without divisions...
(12-02-2017 09:29 PM)esayem Wrote:  I think conferences shouldn’t be forced to have divisions if they have 12 teams. How dumb is that rule when 10 team conferences can reap the benefits?

The ACC could settle a lot of scheduling issues by not being forced to have divisions. Ultimately, divisions create fabricated yearly bouts like Texas A&M-South Carolina and Louisville-Virginia. It would have benefitted the old Big XII by allowing Oklahoma and Nebraska to play every year. All the Cali schools in the Pac 12 could go back to playing each other yearly as well.

The old school 12 team SEC (with GT and Tulane) didn’t have divisions and they were fine.

The only good thing about divisions is that it eliminates a back to back repeat game.

You mean like Fresno State and Boise State?
12-02-2017 10:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MWC Tex Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,625
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 112
I Root For: MW
Location: TX
Post: #29
RE: Anyone find it silly that conferences without divisions...
(12-02-2017 10:05 PM)ken d Wrote:  
(12-02-2017 09:29 PM)esayem Wrote:  I think conferences shouldn’t be forced to have divisions if they have 12 teams. How dumb is that rule when 10 team conferences can reap the benefits?

The ACC could settle a lot of scheduling issues by not being forced to have divisions. Ultimately, divisions create fabricated yearly bouts like Texas A&M-South Carolina and Louisville-Virginia. It would have benefitted the old Big XII by allowing Oklahoma and Nebraska to play every year. All the Cali schools in the Pac 12 could go back to playing each other yearly as well.

The old school 12 team SEC (with GT and Tulane) didn’t have divisions and they were fine.

The only good thing about divisions is that it eliminates a back to back repeat game.

You mean like Fresno State and Boise State?

Ha..yep!

There has been some emails sent to the MW office that all cross division games should be played first. If there is a rematch, it would be a game that happened a while ago.
12-02-2017 10:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bullet Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 22,935
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 481
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #30
RE: Anyone find it silly that conferences without divisions...
(12-02-2017 03:54 PM)_C2_ Wrote:  @ quo

True but they do play round robin, which is more than fair. Football conferences have never been double round robin except in the very old days with much smaller conferences. Imagine a scenario where Team A beats Team B by 50 but loses to them by 1 in the CCG. It's one thing in two division conferences but ridiculous in single division conferences.

2001 regular season, Texas 41, Colorado 7.
2001 big 12 ccg, Colorado 39, Texas 37.

It happens in two division conferences.
12-02-2017 10:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2017 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2017 MyBB Group.