(11-25-2017 01:26 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-25-2017 12:32 PM)MTPiKapp Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 06:01 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 07:05 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 06:00 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  Including his young Bride, or just you and others talking schit from the outside?

You do know back only a generation or so ago, 1950’s +~ , most girls were either married by 25, or never did, right?

My own Mother had 5 Aunts, all lovely professional people. 3 were ever married, betwixt all five they produced one kid., my Mom. The others were told they were too old to marry, the married told to not try and reproduce, downs, CP, other ailments too “likely”.

So, not sure of your “point” if there even was one

The link he posted is to the movie of a fiction that is from Italy. That is a bad example for what he is trying to point to Roy Moore. In other countries? 16 and 17 year olds are considered adults. I think in italy, 17 is of legal age as an adult. From the sound of the summery of the movie, the 17 year old pursued a relationship. In Roy Moore's case, he seeked out the underage girls. Even it is illegal here in the US, but it is not in other countries.

The movie is being released in the US and its US critics praising it. How can Hollywood "elite" back something like this, THEN, criticize Moore for attempting to date girls essentially the same age as the boy in this movie? In Alabama the age of consent was 16 at the time the alleged Moore events took place.

And at least one of Moore's accusers was fourteen at the time, so what's your point?

There is no evidence she is telling the truth. She is a troubled woman that had a troubled childhood. I don't blame her for trying to make some money under her circumstances, but her story is about as credible as monkeys flying out of my arse.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Yeah, being sexually assualted by a man in his thirties would certainly qualify as a troubled childhood.

You speak of her having no evidence in one breath and in the very next accuse her of getting paid to make this accusation. So you can make accusations without evidence, but she can't? Got it.

Cool man...

Ok...so Roy Moore is excused because someone wrote a movie about a 17 year old dating someone in Italy....Mmmkay.

(11-25-2017 01:51 PM)MTPiKapp Wrote:  Yeah, being sexually assualted by a man in his thirties would certainly qualify as a troubled childhood.
You speak of her having no evidence in one breath and in the very next accuse her of getting paid to make this accusation. So you can make accusations without evidence, but she can't? Got it.
Cool man...

At this point, they are both accusations without evidence. One is free to believe or not believe either, or both, depending on which seems more likely to you.

(11-25-2017 01:26 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-25-2017 12:32 PM)MTPiKapp Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 06:01 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 07:05 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 06:00 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  Including his young Bride, or just you and others talking schit from the outside?

You do know back only a generation or so ago, 1950’s +~ , most girls were either married by 25, or never did, right?

My own Mother had 5 Aunts, all lovely professional people. 3 were ever married, betwixt all five they produced one kid., my Mom. The others were told they were too old to marry, the married told to not try and reproduce, downs, CP, other ailments too “likely”.

So, not sure of your “point” if there even was one

The link he posted is to the movie of a fiction that is from Italy. That is a bad example for what he is trying to point to Roy Moore. In other countries? 16 and 17 year olds are considered adults. I think in italy, 17 is of legal age as an adult. From the sound of the summery of the movie, the 17 year old pursued a relationship. In Roy Moore's case, he seeked out the underage girls. Even it is illegal here in the US, but it is not in other countries.

The movie is being released in the US and its US critics praising it. How can Hollywood "elite" back something like this, THEN, criticize Moore for attempting to date girls essentially the same age as the boy in this movie? In Alabama the age of consent was 16 at the time the alleged Moore events took place.

And at least one of Moore's accusers was fourteen at the time, so what's your point?

There is no evidence she is telling the truth. She is a troubled woman that had a troubled childhood. I don't blame her for trying to make some money under her circumstances, but her story is about as credible as monkeys flying out of my arse.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

And the victim is not looking for money either. None of these women are looking for any.

(11-25-2017 04:35 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(11-25-2017 01:26 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-25-2017 12:32 PM)MTPiKapp Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 06:01 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 07:05 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  The link he posted is to the movie of a fiction that is from Italy. That is a bad example for what he is trying to point to Roy Moore. In other countries? 16 and 17 year olds are considered adults. I think in italy, 17 is of legal age as an adult. From the sound of the summery of the movie, the 17 year old pursued a relationship. In Roy Moore's case, he seeked out the underage girls. Even it is illegal here in the US, but it is not in other countries.

The movie is being released in the US and its US critics praising it. How can Hollywood "elite" back something like this, THEN, criticize Moore for attempting to date girls essentially the same age as the boy in this movie? In Alabama the age of consent was 16 at the time the alleged Moore events took place.

And at least one of Moore's accusers was fourteen at the time, so what's your point?

There is no evidence she is telling the truth. She is a troubled woman that had a troubled childhood. I don't blame her for trying to make some money under her circumstances, but her story is about as credible as monkeys flying out of my arse.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

And the victim is not looking for money either. None of these women are looking for any.

There's no way to get money out of the legal system. The statute has run on civil actions.

Of course, the theory that they are lying would imply that they have already been paid.

(11-25-2017 01:51 PM)MTPiKapp Wrote:  

(11-25-2017 01:26 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-25-2017 12:32 PM)MTPiKapp Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 06:01 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 07:05 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  The link he posted is to the movie of a fiction that is from Italy. That is a bad example for what he is trying to point to Roy Moore. In other countries? 16 and 17 year olds are considered adults. I think in italy, 17 is of legal age as an adult. From the sound of the summery of the movie, the 17 year old pursued a relationship. In Roy Moore's case, he seeked out the underage girls. Even it is illegal here in the US, but it is not in other countries.

The movie is being released in the US and its US critics praising it. How can Hollywood "elite" back something like this, THEN, criticize Moore for attempting to date girls essentially the same age as the boy in this movie? In Alabama the age of consent was 16 at the time the alleged Moore events took place.

And at least one of Moore's accusers was fourteen at the time, so what's your point?

There is no evidence she is telling the truth. She is a troubled woman that had a troubled childhood. I don't blame her for trying to make some money under her circumstances, but her story is about as credible as monkeys flying out of my arse.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Yeah, being sexually assualted by a man in his thirties would certainly qualify as a troubled childhood.

You speak of her having no evidence in one breath and in the very next accuse her of getting paid to make this accusation. So you can make accusations without evidence, but she can't? Got it.

Cool man...

That is who perverts targets. They target kids with a trouble home, and molest them. That is how the Catholic priests targeted the boys with both parents fighting and divorced. These kids look for help to get away, and they become to trusting to someone that supposed to help them. With Moore's case? He took advantage of Corfman, and tried to sexually assault her.

(11-25-2017 04:39 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(11-25-2017 04:35 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(11-25-2017 01:26 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-25-2017 12:32 PM)MTPiKapp Wrote:  

(11-24-2017 06:01 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  The movie is being released in the US and its US critics praising it. How can Hollywood "elite" back something like this, THEN, criticize Moore for attempting to date girls essentially the same age as the boy in this movie? In Alabama the age of consent was 16 at the time the alleged Moore events took place.

And at least one of Moore's accusers was fourteen at the time, so what's your point?

There is no evidence she is telling the truth. She is a troubled woman that had a troubled childhood. I don't blame her for trying to make some money under her circumstances, but her story is about as credible as monkeys flying out of my arse.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

And the victim is not looking for money either. None of these women are looking for any.

There's no way to get money out of the legal system. The statute has run on civil actions.

Of course, the theory that they are lying would imply that they have already been paid.

You can sell books, stories, and media appearances.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

There is something wrong with a man in his 30s wanting to date girls who are still in high school. Either the guy only cares about getting a young piece of ass and is in reality a hypocrite on the family values front (which he is a big time supporter of I believe) or he's got a screw loose in the head if he's dating them because he can relate to them on the same level. NFW I vote for this guy if I lived in Alabama. However, it's not my call nor any other outsiders. The citizens of Alabama have a right to elect whoever they want. If he's guilty of these crimes and charged - that's a different matter. If he is not charged with crimes - then he has a right to be a senator if he's elected.

Being a perv should disqualify one from the Senate.

Apparently, though, it doesn’t.

(11-27-2017 09:55 AM)bubbapt Wrote:  Being a perv should disqualify one from the Senate.

Apparently, though, it doesn’t.

If you disqualify pervs, thieves and narcissists...who'd govern us? Emotionally healthy people do not want any part of politics - IMHO.

(11-27-2017 09:58 AM)miko33 Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 09:55 AM)bubbapt Wrote:  Being a perv should disqualify one from the Senate.

Apparently, though, it doesn’t.

If you disqualify pervs, thieves and narcissists...who'd govern us? Emotionally healthy people do not want any part of politics - IMHO.

Well there are people like Jeb! and W. But the public finally decided to elect a Republican ticket again without a Nixon or Bush (for the first time since 1928). Not 100% sure I can still exclude their dad from the perv category-but then maybe it is just age.

(11-27-2017 10:24 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 09:58 AM)miko33 Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 09:55 AM)bubbapt Wrote:  Being a perv should disqualify one from the Senate.

Apparently, though, it doesn’t.

If you disqualify pervs, thieves and narcissists...who'd govern us? Emotionally healthy people do not want any part of politics - IMHO.

Well there are people like Jeb! and W. But the public finally decided to elect a Republican ticket again without a Nixon or Bush (for the first time since 1928). Not 100% sure I can still exclude their dad from the perv category-but then maybe it is just age.

My wife works at a retirement continuing care community. I can guarantee you it is the age. She gets "sexually assaulted" on a weekly basis... and this is a very expensive, high end community. I highly doubt H.W. is a perv in his right mind.

(11-27-2017 12:05 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 10:24 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 09:58 AM)miko33 Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 09:55 AM)bubbapt Wrote:  Being a perv should disqualify one from the Senate.

Apparently, though, it doesn’t.

If you disqualify pervs, thieves and narcissists...who'd govern us? Emotionally healthy people do not want any part of politics - IMHO.

Well there are people like Jeb! and W. But the public finally decided to elect a Republican ticket again without a Nixon or Bush (for the first time since 1928). Not 100% sure I can still exclude their dad from the perv category-but then maybe it is just age.

My wife works at a retirement continuing care community. I can guarantee you it is the age. She gets "sexually assaulted" on a weekly basis... and this is a very expensive, high end community. I highly doubt H.W. is a perv in his right mind.

I agree. My dad propositioned their ironing lady. She was around 32 years old and he was really old in his late 70s or early 80s. It's hard for someone with a strong libido to leave it behind even in old age. I guess a hand in the bush is better than a hand on yourself.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201...roy-moore/

The case for Roy Moore.

(11-27-2017 05:31 PM)bullet Wrote:  https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201...roy-moore/

The case for Roy Moore.

Opinion piece by the Moonie Times. Written by a Brietbart contributor and a confirmed Trumper.

The opinion piece basically doesn't make much of a case. It just says...WHATABOUT Bill Clinton?

(11-27-2017 06:23 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 05:31 PM)bullet Wrote:  https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201...roy-moore/

The case for Roy Moore.

Opinion piece by the Moonie Times. Written by a Brietbart contributor and a confirmed Trumper.

The opinion piece basically doesn't make much of a case. It just says...WHATABOUT Bill Clinton?

Is it really a piece that excuses Moore of wrong doing by citing Clinton as doing the same thing? Or is it wondering why people are willing to give one person the benefit of the doubt but will not give a different person the same courtesy? The former justifies why someone should be given a free pass while the latter questions the motivation behind why people pick and choose whether to excuse bad behavior or to prosecute it.

(11-27-2017 12:17 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 12:05 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 10:24 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 09:58 AM)miko33 Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 09:55 AM)bubbapt Wrote:  Being a perv should disqualify one from the Senate.

Apparently, though, it doesn’t.

If you disqualify pervs, thieves and narcissists...who'd govern us? Emotionally healthy people do not want any part of politics - IMHO.

Well there are people like Jeb! and W. But the public finally decided to elect a Republican ticket again without a Nixon or Bush (for the first time since 1928). Not 100% sure I can still exclude their dad from the perv category-but then maybe it is just age.

My wife works at a retirement continuing care community. I can guarantee you it is the age. She gets "sexually assaulted" on a weekly basis... and this is a very expensive, high end community. I highly doubt H.W. is a perv in his right mind.

I agree. My dad propositioned their ironing lady. She was around 32 years old and he was really old in his late 70s or early 80s. It's hard for someone with a strong libido to leave it behind even in old age. I guess a hand in the bush is better than a hand on yourself.

#costa or the hooker retirement brigade is my end goal.....as long as the blue pills are still available....