Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)
Open TigerLinks
 

Post Reply 
FedExForum non-compete clause
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
3601 Offline
HoopDreams' Daddy
*

Posts: 26,909
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 371
I Root For: Omar Sneed
Location: Mempho
Post: #1
FedExForum non-compete clause
Elvis Presley Enterprises has filed a declaratory judgment action in Chancery Court in an attempt to avoid the non-compete clause.
11-15-2017 02:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Latilleon Offline
Git Buck.
*

Posts: 21,611
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 473
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #2
RE: FedExForum non-compete clause
The non-compete clause only works with city/county owned venues.

If Elvis Presley Enterprises built an arena, then it would not be subject to it. The question is if maybe the city isn’t offering tax breaks and/or incentives that would infer city ownership.

Has the Grizz org blocked events at AZP now that it is city owned?
(This post was last modified: 11-15-2017 02:42 PM by Latilleon.)
11-15-2017 02:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
salukiblue Offline
Liaison to the Dummies
*

Posts: 31,099
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation: 1292
I Root For: Space Mountain
Location: Tennessee
Post: #3
RE: FedExForum non-compete clause
(11-15-2017 02:41 PM)Latilleon Wrote:  The non-compete clause only works with city/county owned venues.

If Elvis Presley Enterprises built an arena, then it would not be subject to it. The question is if maybe the city isn’t offering tax breaks and/or incentives that would infer city ownership.

Has the Grizz org blocked events at AZP now that it is city owned?

Has to been enclosed facilities.

That's why the MSC, at some point, was considering the half-baked idea of taking the dome off and making it some open air venue.
11-15-2017 03:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
salukiblue Offline
Liaison to the Dummies
*

Posts: 31,099
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation: 1292
I Root For: Space Mountain
Location: Tennessee
Post: #4
RE: FedExForum non-compete clause
The non-compete clause applies to ALL indoor or covered facilities, arenas, etc., that could compete with the Forum for bookings. The non-compete clause controls which TYPE of event may be booked. The ONLY events in which a promoter has a choice of venue are "Excluded Events" and certain "Local Community Events" that produce less than $5,000 in revenue. See image #1 (Definition of terms) and image #3 (part2 of section 30b) for more details about Excluded and Local Community events.
11-15-2017 03:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Latilleon Offline
Git Buck.
*

Posts: 21,611
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 473
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #5
RE: FedExForum non-compete clause
(11-15-2017 03:18 PM)salukiblue Wrote:  The non-compete clause applies to ALL indoor or covered facilities, arenas, etc., that could compete with the Forum for bookings. The non-compete clause controls which TYPE of event may be booked. The ONLY events in which a promoter has a choice of venue are "Excluded Events" and certain "Local Community Events" that produce less than $5,000 in revenue. See image #1 (Definition of terms) and image #3 (part2 of section 30b) for more details about Excluded and Local Community events.

Doesn’t apply to privately owned venues though. The Orpheum isn’t subject to it while Cannon is.

U of M facilities are exempt.
(This post was last modified: 11-15-2017 03:57 PM by Latilleon.)
11-15-2017 03:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Latilleon Offline
Git Buck.
*

Posts: 21,611
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 473
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #6
RE: FedExForum non-compete clause
11-15-2017 06:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TIGERCITY Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 19,975
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 453
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #7
RE: FedExForum non-compete clause
(11-15-2017 02:36 PM)3601 Wrote:  Elvis Presley Enterprises has filed a declaratory judgment action in Chancery Court in an attempt to avoid the non-compete clause.

Sounds like EPE is contending that the venue will show only EPE produced events that would not otherwise be produced. EPE also contends that what they are proposing is similar to the proposed Fairgrounds project, which has approval.
11-15-2017 08:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.
MemphisTigers.org is the number one message board for Memphis Tigers sports.