Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Lacrosse : realignment, rivalries (postponed) and re-evaluation (costs)
Author Message
Bogg Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 710
Joined: Sep 2016
Reputation: 33
I Root For: UConn
Location:
Post: #21
RE: Lacrosse : realignment, rivalries (postponed) and re-evaluation (costs)
(11-13-2017 05:45 AM)The Cutter of Bish Wrote:  
(11-12-2017 05:00 PM)Bogg Wrote:  To be fair, and I'm about the furthest one can get from an expert on the topic, but it seems like there are hurdles to overcome in starting up football that just aren't there in lacrosse. Football at that level is a significant expense, while it sounds like lacrosse is a pretty minor expense/can generate a small profit in terms of enrollment numbers without having to be at the very top level of the sport.

I don't disagree with that. It costs much less to run a lacrosse program than football, and lacrosse has the potential to be more profitable even with limited funding. Football is a wash if you aren't getting major network subsidies, alumni donations, and selling out your venue seven or eight times a year. Lacrosse offers smaller rosters, lower staffing, and there's partials if you're not going to pay for every kid to be there.

As another said, this is a good problem to have for lacrosse. I just can't look past it being these guys doing it when it's been known they're becoming more invisible. If the subject is A-10 lacrosse, I wouldn't bet on La Salle as a long-term solution.

There's no reason St. Joe's has to want them wherever they are, either. What does it do for them, you know, other than saving some money on travel?

Fair enough, just seems like lacrosse is a much, much easier sport to start up than football, particularly if you're looking to use already-existing infrastructure (if you already have a soccer team it seems like you're not much more than a locker room away). That being said, I don't really think the A-10 would need La Salle to start up lacrosse. If I understand the current situation (which is to say, Wikipedia'd right), NJIT and Hampton are sitting there as independents that would make a clean geographic fit for the other four members, and are in good general recruiting areas to boot.
(This post was last modified: 11-13-2017 09:23 AM by Bogg.)
11-13-2017 09:20 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jdgaucho Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,570
Joined: Nov 2012
Reputation: 31
I Root For: UCSB
Location: Big West Land
Post: #22
RE: Lacrosse : realignment, rivalries (postponed) and re-evaluation (costs)
(11-12-2017 08:41 PM)NoDak Wrote:  
(11-12-2017 08:01 PM)TerpsNPhoenix Wrote:  
(11-12-2017 03:48 PM)jdgaucho Wrote:  All fine and dandy - but there's practically zero lacrosse out west save for Denver and Air Force. Down the line that will have to be addressed.

I don't agree with "practically zero" but there is absolutely a TON of potential growth opportunities. Here's a gif that shows growth from 2005-2015.

[Image: lacrosse-gif3.gif]

The women's side has been growing much more. Utah starting men's lax is a PAC12 start. Suspect USC and Stanford will step up soon for men's lax. USC has stated they are monitoring the situation.

Yep. I heard somewhere that Oregon was looking into it as well.
11-13-2017 12:06 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bogg Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 710
Joined: Sep 2016
Reputation: 33
I Root For: UConn
Location:
Post: #23
RE: Lacrosse : realignment, rivalries (postponed) and re-evaluation (costs)
It's not what people mean when they talk about the sport growing out West, but if Atlantic 10 lacrosse looks like it's going to become a thing, and the Bonnies are right about lacrosse potentially being cost-neutral/slightly profitable if run correctly, I wonder if Saint Louis would look at elevating their club team to a varsity sport. It's not "out West", but they'd be one of the Westernmost D1 programs in the country. With Big East expansion a couple years out it wouldn't hurt to better align the department with Big East sports sponsored, and worst-case it helps the University further recruit East Coast students from high-income families that are supposedly one of the benefits of A10 membership to begin with.
11-19-2017 05:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DawgNBama Offline
NCR Ranger
*

Posts: 2,395
Joined: Sep 2002
Reputation: 50
I Root For: p-natal vitamin
Location: prenatal vitamins
Post: #24
RE: Lacrosse : realignment, rivalries (postponed) and re-evaluation (costs)
(11-12-2017 03:48 PM)jdgaucho Wrote:  All fine and dandy - but there's practically zero lacrosse out west save for Denver and Air Force. Down the line that will have to be addressed.

Which is sad, because the weather is perfect for lacrosse out west for the most part.

Hmm, maybe my alma mater Montevallo needs to take a look at adding lacrosse. We definitely have a field where it could be played, and we're not getting football any time soon, if ever. Lacrosse might be a good option for us.
11-20-2017 03:26 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Erictelevision Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 803
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation: 10
I Root For: Uconn hoops
Location:
Post: #25
RE: Lacrosse : realignment, rivalries (postponed) and re-evaluation (costs)
How well is it growing in the MAC and B1G?
11-21-2017 09:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
NoDak Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,574
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation: 80
I Root For: UND
Location:
Post: #26
RE: Lacrosse : realignment, rivalries (postponed) and re-evaluation (costs)
(11-21-2017 09:38 PM)Erictelevision Wrote:  How well is it growing in the MAC and B1G?

The MAC has added women's programs, which are in another xonference, but not men's. Minnesota has said they. have interest, but nothing is imminent. The B1G has stood still since B1G lacrosse formes.
11-22-2017 01:25 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DavidSt Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 9,349
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 109
I Root For: ATU, P7
Location:
Post: #27
RE: Lacrosse : realignment, rivalries (postponed) and re-evaluation (costs)
Bellarmine wants to add women's LAX to be in D1.
11-22-2017 01:38 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
chess Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,797
Joined: Dec 2003
Reputation: 137
I Root For: ECU & Nebraska
Location: Chicagoland
Post: #28
RE: Lacrosse : realignment, rivalries (postponed) and re-evaluation (costs)
I announce lacrosse games in the Chicago area for our local youth organization. Last year, Illinois started offering a state championship for high school lacrosse. For any east coasters whose playing days are over and wish to coach- Move to the Midwest. Our local high school needs a coach. The league, where I announce, is the feeder program for the high school. Young people love playing lacrosse. Kids are giving up football for lacrosse. High School Baseball, who competes for players during the lacrosse season, is expecting to lose players.

As for your suggestion that Johns Hopkins consider a conference with George Mason (my school), etc.. Johns Hopkins joined the Big Ten for a number of reasons. The Big Ten Network is available locally and throughout the country. BTN needs programming and is willing to pay for it.

The Big Ten Network is the reason you are seeing members adding sports like college hockey and lacrosse.
(This post was last modified: 11-22-2017 01:46 PM by chess.)
11-22-2017 07:09 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
sctvman Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 589
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 12
I Root For: C of Charleston
Location: Charleston, SC
Post: #29
RE: Lacrosse : realignment, rivalries (postponed) and re-evaluation (costs)
I’m surprised South Carolina only has one D1 men’s lacrosse program, Furman. There are 50 schools in SC that have programs. 23 5A schools have programs, and there’s only 42 5A schools. That’s expanding to 48 starting next year.

The SCHSL sanctioned the sport, and now has two state champions. That alone will probably expand the sport by a few schools. Some of the additional 5A schools could add it, especially those in the Upstate and the Lowcountry where there is growth in lacrosse.

Wando (a huge public school, over 4,000 students in rich Mt. Pleasant), Bishop England (a Catholic private school) and Porter-Gaud (another private school) are the only 3 schools with boys teams in the Charleston area. Ashley Hall (a all-girls private school) also plays lacrosse. There will probably be some expansion in the next few years with more schools adding the sport.
11-22-2017 11:43 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bogg Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 710
Joined: Sep 2016
Reputation: 33
I Root For: UConn
Location:
Post: #30
RE: Lacrosse : realignment, rivalries (postponed) and re-evaluation (costs)
(11-22-2017 11:43 AM)sctvman Wrote:  I’m surprised South Carolina only has one D1 men’s lacrosse program, Furman. There are 50 schools in SC that have programs. 23 5A schools have programs, and there’s only 42 5A schools. That’s expanding to 48 starting next year.

The SCHSL sanctioned the sport, and now has two state champions. That alone will probably expand the sport by a few schools. Some of the additional 5A schools could add it, especially those in the Upstate and the Lowcountry where there is growth in lacrosse.

Wando (a huge public school, over 4,000 students in rich Mt. Pleasant), Bishop England (a Catholic private school) and Porter-Gaud (another private school) are the only 3 schools with boys teams in the Charleston area. Ashley Hall (a all-girls private school) also plays lacrosse. There will probably be some expansion in the next few years with more schools adding the sport.

Wofford and The Citadel both seem like they'd be good institutional fits for a lacrosse program, and the SoCon sponsoring the sport takes the question of finding a home out of the picture. Wofford could probably use the extra enrollment (similar to the Bonnies) and with The Citadel having VMI and Air Force in-conference and Army/Navy both fielding programs the rivalries are obvious.
11-22-2017 12:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2018 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2018 MyBB Group.