(11-11-2017 12:04 PM)banker Wrote:  What did he say that wasn't true?

and what did he say that was 'praise'?

(11-11-2017 12:51 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 12:28 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  “Praising”

LOL

80 examples of Trump praising Putin, all sourced.

I think you obviously missed the point....

The leader of Russia, meaning the only other person who would really KNOW is denying it... and of course, he would have a lot to gain by proving it true, throwing our system into chaos, which was the entire plan from the beginning.

That's not 'praise'.


I also stopped after the first three of your 80 claims.... NONE of which was 'praise'... It was at best, recognition that he's the leader of a country where he was holding an event, and having a sitting leader attend would be a feather in his cap.

Really grasping at straws here against the man and country Obama said wasn't our biggest threat.... AND he promised Vladimir personally 'more flexibility' after the election.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact...48bfe7b82d

Don't care what the article's position on the events were... I'm just pointing out the undisputed facts of what Obama said.

(11-11-2017 03:53 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 12:04 PM)banker Wrote:  What did he say that wasn't true?

and what did he say that was 'praise'?

(11-11-2017 12:51 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 12:28 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  “Praising”

LOL

80 examples of Trump praising Putin, all sourced.

I think you obviously missed the point....

The leader of Russia, meaning the only other person who would really KNOW is denying it... and of course, he would have a lot to gain by proving it true, throwing our system into chaos, which was the entire plan from the beginning.

That's not 'praise'.


I also stopped after the first three of your 80 claims.... NONE of which was 'praise'... It was at best, recognition that he's the leader of a country where he was holding an event, and having a sitting leader attend would be a feather in his cap.

Really grasping at straws here against the man and country Obama said wasn't our biggest threat.... AND he promised Vladimir personally 'more flexibility' after the election.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact...48bfe7b82d

Don't care what the article's position on the events were... I'm just pointing out the undisputed facts of what Obama said.

1. Your reasoning as to why Putin would admit it if it were true is just nonsense, and shows an entire lack of thought. What do you think would happen, politically, if Putin started loudly proclaiming how he rigged the election? It wouldn't cause chaos, it would just confirm what literally every intelligence agency in the US and among our allies has been trying to get those of you around these parts to understand. It would cause massive, concerted backlash against Russia, and he could wave removing those pesky sanctions he talked to Trumps team about goodbye. But, once again, who knows if what Trump even said was true, since Putins Administration is denying any sort of discussion on collusion at all.

2. You're arguing that Obama viewed Putin as less dangerous before he pursued a successful attempt at influencing our nations election system? Ya, no sh*t. How exactly is that supposed to be compelling evidence of anything?

Trump tossing Putin bones to liberals and they gnaw on it for days one end. Hilarious.

(11-11-2017 04:31 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Trump tossing Putin bones to liberals and they gnaw on it for days one end. Hilarious.

Hahahah our president is clearly beholden to a foreign government lol

(11-11-2017 04:33 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 04:31 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Trump tossing Putin bones to liberals and they gnaw on it for days one end. Hilarious.

Hahahah our president is clearly beholden to a foreign government lol

That was Obama, not Trump. Hillary/Fusion tried to set up Trump with Russian BS meetings etc. Did not work. Your people paid the Russians.

(11-11-2017 04:39 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 04:33 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 04:31 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Trump tossing Putin bones to liberals and they gnaw on it for days one end. Hilarious.

Hahahah our president is clearly beholden to a foreign government lol

That was Obama, not Trump. Hillary/Fusion tried to set up Trump with Russian BS meetings etc. Did not work. Your people paid the Russians.

Sure. The democrats set up Trump Jr, Pappadopolous, and Page, made them enthusiastically respond to said traps, to show up to said meetings, admit to discussing sanctions during a Clinton conspired meeting, and then have Sessions, Flynn, Trump, Kushner, Clovis, Manafort, Trump Jr, and everyone else in their campaign lie about it.

None of what you're saying makes any sense, and even worse, in no way, shape, or form actually absolves the Trump Campaign of their actions. Even if Clinton is so powerful and prescient to have set all of this up expertly, lol, the Trump Campaign still acted under the impression that they were talking to Russians about legitimate dirt on Hillary.

(11-11-2017 10:53 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  Source, but a simple google will pull up plenty of others

Quote:"I mean, give me a break, they are political hacks," Trump said. "So you look at it, I mean, you have Brennan, you have Clapper and you have Comey. Comey is proven now to be a liar and he is proven now to be a leaker. So you look at that and you have President Putin very strongly, vehemently says he had nothing to do with them."

A real gem this guy is, believes Putin over our own, and literally every single allies, intelligence agencies. Nothing weird about that, party over country and all.

Donald Trump is selling us out to the enemy. He is becoming a traitor of this country and needs to be Impeached. He is now a Benedict Arnold.

(11-11-2017 04:54 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 10:53 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  Source, but a simple google will pull up plenty of others

Quote:"I mean, give me a break, they are political hacks," Trump said. "So you look at it, I mean, you have Brennan, you have Clapper and you have Comey. Comey is proven now to be a liar and he is proven now to be a leaker. So you look at that and you have President Putin very strongly, vehemently says he had nothing to do with them."

A real gem this guy is, believes Putin over our own, and literally every single allies, intelligence agencies. Nothing weird about that, party over country and all.

Donald Trump is selling us out to the enemy. He is becoming a traitor of this country and needs to be Impeached. He is now a Benedict Arnold.

No, Benedict Arnold wasn't a draft dodger.

There is zero proof that Putin actually HACKED the election.

No votes were changed. Trump won the White House fair and square.

Deal with it.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

her retarded campaign manager feeding his password to a phish <> "hacking the election".

(11-11-2017 05:02 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  There is zero proof that Putin actually HACKED the election.

No votes were changed. Trump won the White House fair and square.

Deal with it.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

There's also zero evidence the Russians hacked the DNC since the Dems won't let law enforcement examine the servers. The only person who would really know, Assange, says it was a leak and not a hack. Wikileaks has a better record of truth - telling than the Intel community or the DNC.

(11-11-2017 04:53 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 04:39 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 04:33 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 04:31 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Trump tossing Putin bones to liberals and they gnaw on it for days one end. Hilarious.

Hahahah our president is clearly beholden to a foreign government lol

That was Obama, not Trump. Hillary/Fusion tried to set up Trump with Russian BS meetings etc. Did not work. Your people paid the Russians.

Sure. The democrats set up Trump Jr, Pappadopolous, and Page, made them enthusiastically respond to said traps, to show up to said meetings, admit to discussing sanctions during a Clinton conspired meeting, and then have Sessions, Flynn, Trump, Kushner, Clovis, Manafort, Trump Jr, and everyone else in their campaign lie about it.

None of what you're saying makes any sense, and even worse, in no way, shape, or form actually absolves the Trump Campaign of their actions. Even if Clinton is so powerful and prescient to have set all of this up expertly, lol, the Trump Campaign still acted under the impression that they were talking to Russians about legitimate dirt on Hillary.

We won you lost.

(11-11-2017 05:10 PM)Jugnaut Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 05:02 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  There is zero proof that Putin actually HACKED the election.

No votes were changed. Trump won the White House fair and square.

Deal with it.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

There's also zero evidence the Russians hacked the DNC since the Dems won't let law enforcement examine the servers. The only person who would really know, Assange, says it was a leak and not a hack. Wikileaks has a better record of truth - telling than the Intel community or the DNC.

Sure, the guy with the TV show on RT, whose leaks has conspicuously not included anything negative about Russia, and whose safety depends on Russias support for him is the guy you should listen to.

(11-11-2017 05:35 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 04:53 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 04:39 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 04:33 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 04:31 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  Trump tossing Putin bones to liberals and they gnaw on it for days one end. Hilarious.

Hahahah our president is clearly beholden to a foreign government lol

That was Obama, not Trump. Hillary/Fusion tried to set up Trump with Russian BS meetings etc. Did not work. Your people paid the Russians.

Sure. The democrats set up Trump Jr, Pappadopolous, and Page, made them enthusiastically respond to said traps, to show up to said meetings, admit to discussing sanctions during a Clinton conspired meeting, and then have Sessions, Flynn, Trump, Kushner, Clovis, Manafort, Trump Jr, and everyone else in their campaign lie about it.

None of what you're saying makes any sense, and even worse, in no way, shape, or form actually absolves the Trump Campaign of their actions. Even if Clinton is so powerful and prescient to have set all of this up expertly, lol, the Trump Campaign still acted under the impression that they were talking to Russians about legitimate dirt on Hillary.

We won you lost.

he's going to say something about the russians. then he's going to say something about the popular vote.

(11-11-2017 05:50 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 05:35 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 04:53 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 04:39 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 04:33 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  Hahahah our president is clearly beholden to a foreign government lol

That was Obama, not Trump. Hillary/Fusion tried to set up Trump with Russian BS meetings etc. Did not work. Your people paid the Russians.

Sure. The democrats set up Trump Jr, Pappadopolous, and Page, made them enthusiastically respond to said traps, to show up to said meetings, admit to discussing sanctions during a Clinton conspired meeting, and then have Sessions, Flynn, Trump, Kushner, Clovis, Manafort, Trump Jr, and everyone else in their campaign lie about it.

None of what you're saying makes any sense, and even worse, in no way, shape, or form actually absolves the Trump Campaign of their actions. Even if Clinton is so powerful and prescient to have set all of this up expertly, lol, the Trump Campaign still acted under the impression that they were talking to Russians about legitimate dirt on Hillary.

We won you lost.

he's going to say something about the russians. then he's going to say something about the popular vote.

Well what I'm not going to say, and never had said, is that he didn't win the election. Just wondering, how many years are you guys going to coast on that win?

(11-11-2017 06:03 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 05:50 PM)EagleX Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 05:35 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 04:53 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 04:39 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  That was Obama, not Trump. Hillary/Fusion tried to set up Trump with Russian BS meetings etc. Did not work. Your people paid the Russians.

Sure. The democrats set up Trump Jr, Pappadopolous, and Page, made them enthusiastically respond to said traps, to show up to said meetings, admit to discussing sanctions during a Clinton conspired meeting, and then have Sessions, Flynn, Trump, Kushner, Clovis, Manafort, Trump Jr, and everyone else in their campaign lie about it.

None of what you're saying makes any sense, and even worse, in no way, shape, or form actually absolves the Trump Campaign of their actions. Even if Clinton is so powerful and prescient to have set all of this up expertly, lol, the Trump Campaign still acted under the impression that they were talking to Russians about legitimate dirt on Hillary.

We won you lost.

he's going to say something about the russians. then he's going to say something about the popular vote.

Well what I'm not going to say, and never had said, is that he didn't win the election. Just wondering, how many years are you guys going to coast on that win?

it's up to you. we're going to continue to kick your a$$ for as long as you blame your loss on delusional sh*t like russian hacking.

you won't fix it until you admit that it's broken.

(11-11-2017 04:18 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 03:53 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 12:04 PM)banker Wrote:  What did he say that wasn't true?

and what did he say that was 'praise'?

(11-11-2017 12:51 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 12:28 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  “Praising”

LOL

80 examples of Trump praising Putin, all sourced.

I think you obviously missed the point....

The leader of Russia, meaning the only other person who would really KNOW is denying it... and of course, he would have a lot to gain by proving it true, throwing our system into chaos, which was the entire plan from the beginning.

That's not 'praise'.


I also stopped after the first three of your 80 claims.... NONE of which was 'praise'... It was at best, recognition that he's the leader of a country where he was holding an event, and having a sitting leader attend would be a feather in his cap.

Really grasping at straws here against the man and country Obama said wasn't our biggest threat.... AND he promised Vladimir personally 'more flexibility' after the election.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact...48bfe7b82d

Don't care what the article's position on the events were... I'm just pointing out the undisputed facts of what Obama said.

1. Your reasoning as to why Putin would admit it if it were true is just nonsense, and shows an entire lack of thought. What do you think would happen, politically, if Putin started loudly proclaiming how he rigged the election? It wouldn't cause chaos, it would just confirm what literally every intelligence agency in the US and among our allies has been trying to get those of you around these parts to understand. It would cause massive, concerted backlash against Russia, and he could wave removing those pesky sanctions he talked to Trumps team about goodbye. But, once again, who knows if what Trump even said was true, since Putins Administration is denying any sort of discussion on collusion at all.

2. You're arguing that Obama viewed Putin as less dangerous before he pursued a successful attempt at influencing our nations election system? Ya, no sh*t. How exactly is that supposed to be compelling evidence of anything?

...still don't know what the word praise means.

The problem is Russia and Putin wants us to fight with each other. He is enjoying the show that we are tearing each other apart. Russia is not our friend. They supply weapons to our enemies. That includes terrorist groups like Hezbollah.

(11-11-2017 05:42 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 05:10 PM)Jugnaut Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 05:02 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  There is zero proof that Putin actually HACKED the election.

No votes were changed. Trump won the White House fair and square.

Deal with it.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

There's also zero evidence the Russians hacked the DNC since the Dems won't let law enforcement examine the servers. The only person who would really know, Assange, says it was a leak and not a hack. Wikileaks has a better record of truth - telling than the Intel community or the DNC.

Sure, the guy with the TV show on RT, whose leaks has conspicuously not included anything negative about Russia, and whose safety depends on Russias support for him is the guy you should listen to.

1. Brennan admitted using CIA to spy on congress (Feinstein) for political reasons.
2. Clapper admitted lying to congress (metadata)for political reasons.
3. Comey admitted leaking to New York Times for political reasons.

Any questions?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

(11-11-2017 11:25 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 05:42 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 05:10 PM)Jugnaut Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 05:02 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  There is zero proof that Putin actually HACKED the election.

No votes were changed. Trump won the White House fair and square.

Deal with it.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

There's also zero evidence the Russians hacked the DNC since the Dems won't let law enforcement examine the servers. The only person who would really know, Assange, says it was a leak and not a hack. Wikileaks has a better record of truth - telling than the Intel community or the DNC.

Sure, the guy with the TV show on RT, whose leaks has conspicuously not included anything negative about Russia, and whose safety depends on Russias support for him is the guy you should listen to.

1. Brennan admitted using CIA to spy on congress (Feinstein) for political reasons.
2. Clapper admitted lying to congress (metadata)for political reasons.
3. Comey admitted leaking to New York Times for political reasons.

Any questions?

Just one, how does any of that affect the fact Assange has clearly been compromised?