(11-14-2017 11:06 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 09:08 PM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 09:11 AM)gdunn Wrote:  Bill Clinton is a rapist

And yet he and his enabling wife are or at least were DNC Gods.

Yeah, and HilLIARy's on record as saying women should be believed.

Of course, that didn't apply to her when she was blasting the women accusing her husband.

The left is so trigger happy when it comes to shouting "right wing hypocrisy." Kinda ironic, ain't it.

So you condemn Hillary (who has sexually assaulted no one btw). That's pretty clear. Do you condemn Roy Moore? Asking for a friend.

BTW, this thread is a 'whataboutism' thread. Basically the entire thread is turning on the issue of selective hypocrisy, so whataboutism would be on topic here. Fire away.

(11-14-2017 11:20 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  So you condemn Hillary (who has sexually assaulted no one btw). That's pretty clear. Do you condemn Roy Moore? Asking for a friend.

BTW, this thread is a 'whataboutism' thread. Basically the entire thread is turning on the issue of selective hypocrisy, so whataboutism would be on topic here. Fire away.

Hillary absolutely aided and abetted and lied to facilitate someone who DID. Not 'allegedly' did. DID.

If Roy Moore is guilty, I don't know of one person who wouldn't condemn him. Do you? Can you name them here? I'll give them my response directly.

Of course there are all sorts of people who would wait until actual PROOF is presented before condemning people. That's not remotely the same thing.

(11-14-2017 11:20 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-14-2017 11:06 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 09:08 PM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  

(11-11-2017 09:11 AM)gdunn Wrote:  Bill Clinton is a rapist

And yet he and his enabling wife are or at least were DNC Gods.

Yeah, and HilLIARy's on record as saying women should be believed.

Of course, that didn't apply to her when she was blasting the women accusing her husband.

The left is so trigger happy when it comes to shouting "right wing hypocrisy." Kinda ironic, ain't it.

So you condemn Hillary (who has sexually assaulted no one btw). That's pretty clear. Do you condemn Roy Moore? Asking for a friend.

BTW, this thread is a 'whataboutism' thread. Basically the entire thread is turning on the issue of selective hypocrisy, so whataboutism would be on topic here. Fire away.

I didn't condemn HilLIARy. I simply pointed out her -- shall we say evolving -- stance regarding women who claim to be the victim of sexual harassment or abuse.

As far as you asking for your friend -- who? Who's the friend you're asking for. I'm asking for, well, me.

Yeah, I threw in the "whataboutism" remark because that's what the left does. It's one of their main tactics:

4. Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.

(11-10-2017 08:25 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  From the National Review. The whole thing is worth the read, but I found this part to be especially powerful.

Quote:Oh, and by the way, I’d like someone to please give me some examples of women who have launched themselves to fame and fortune by falsely accusing men of sexual assault — because we all know that that’s not what happens. What does happen is their reputations are scrutinized harshly, and the allies of the powerful men they’ve accused comb through their pasts looking for evidence that they’re liars. People are afraid to employ them; men are afraid to speak to them; their lives are forever changed. Make no mistake: Speaking out publicly about your abuse is not a way to stardom; it’s a painful, harrowing experience and a sacrifice that so few are able to actually make given how brutal the consequences can be.

We expect your condemnation of Democrat Senator Al Franken in 3, 2, 1,.......