Charlie Sheen is being accused of sodomizing a then 13-year-old Corey Haim on the set of the movie 'Lucas.'

According to the National Enquirer, a now deceased Haim had told others about how he was allegedly raped as a minor by Sheen, who was 19 at the time, while filming the 1986 movie, including former actor, Dominick Brascia, who went on the record about what he says Haim told him.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...Lucas.html

I think Davidst called this one.

Hearsay and the National Enquirer? John Edwards not withstanding, I'd advise against buying too much stock in this one.

Yea and the stories about Weinstein and Spacey are all made up. I mean huge Liberal Dems would never be perverted sexual criminals.

(11-08-2017 01:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Hearsay and the National Enquirer? John Edwards not withstanding, I'd advise against buying too much stock in this one.

Denise Richards divorce papers included claims that Sheen was into pedo porn, male and female. You can probably find a copy of the declaration online. The rumors about him have been out there.

I did hear back in the day that Sheen repeatedly bullied Haim on the set of Lucas.

I don't know about rape though.

(11-08-2017 01:16 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  Yea and the stories about Weinstein and Spacey are all made up. I mean huge Liberal Dems would never be perverted sexual criminals.

And those accusing trump...I assume you feel they're all made up. Did you ignore them and still vote for him?

(11-08-2017 01:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:16 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  Yea and the stories about Weinstein and Spacey are all made up. I mean huge Liberal Dems would never be perverted sexual criminals.

And those accusing trump...I assume you feel they're all made up. Did you ignore them and still vote for him?

Come on, dude. Political enemies have a yuge motive against the POTUS movie stars against (why would they be against?) Harvey Weinestein do not.

I guess I was correct on this one. Charlie is a sex addict, and don't care who have sex with as long as the person have two legs.

(11-08-2017 01:53 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  I guess I was correct on this one. Charlie is a sex addict, and don't care who have sex with as long as the person have two legs.

Sex and rape aren't usually the same thing.

Or is the claim here that it was statutory rape? I didn't bother reading the article.

(11-08-2017 01:53 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  I guess I was correct on this one. Charlie is a sex addict, and don't care who have sex with as long as the person have two legs.

That's a baseless assumption. What makes you think the number of legs is a disqualifier, are you an amputeeist?

(11-08-2017 01:53 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  I guess I was correct on this one. Charlie is a sex addict, and don't care who have sex with as long as the person have two legs.

(11-08-2017 01:56 PM)banker Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:53 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  I guess I was correct on this one. Charlie is a sex addict, and don't care who have sex with as long as the person have two legs.

That's a baseless assumption. What makes you think the number of legs is a disqualifier, are you an amputeeist?

I actually have a friend who has a sexual attraction to women with 1 leg. He's bedded two of them.

(11-08-2017 01:48 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:16 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  Yea and the stories about Weinstein and Spacey are all made up. I mean huge Liberal Dems would never be perverted sexual criminals.

And those accusing trump...I assume you feel they're all made up. Did you ignore them and still vote for him?

Speaking of, where are those Trump accusing women? Once it was seen that they couldn't turn out the opposition to Trump they sorta disappeared...like a fart in the wind. Jaunita Broadrick-still here, Kathleen Willey-still here. I tend to believe accusers who stay the course. Not ones who disapear down the rat hole the moment their usefulness ends.

(11-08-2017 01:56 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:53 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  I guess I was correct on this one. Charlie is a sex addict, and don't care who have sex with as long as the person have two legs.

Sex and rape aren't usually the same thing.

Or is the claim here that it was statutory rape? I didn't bother reading the article.

Sheen was 19 and Haim 13 at the time. Having sex under the age of 18 is considered rape. In most states, 13 is not age of consent doing these things. As it is, the LAPD is now looking into Charlie Sheen, and others. That includes Feldman's claims about the Pedos in Hollywood.

(11-08-2017 02:11 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:56 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:53 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  I guess I was correct on this one. Charlie is a sex addict, and don't care who have sex with as long as the person have two legs.

Sex and rape aren't usually the same thing.

Or is the claim here that it was statutory rape? I didn't bother reading the article.

Sheen was 19 and Haim 13 at the time. Having sex under the age of 18 is considered rape. In most states, 13 is not age of consent doing these things. As it is, the LAPD is now looking into Charlie Sheen, and others. That includes Feldman's claims about the Pedos in Hollywood.

It looks like there is a fairly large pedo ring in Hollywood. My guess is it probably extends into Washington DC also. I hear they all go out for pizza after a hard night of kiddie diddling.

(11-08-2017 01:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Hearsay and the National Enquirer? John Edwards not withstanding, I'd advise against buying too much stock in this one.

Every thread involving a pedo claim you are the 1st one in to douse the fire. It's getting creepy, dude.

(11-08-2017 02:24 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Hearsay and the National Enquirer? John Edwards not withstanding, I'd advise against buying too much stock in this one.

Every thread involving a pedo claim you are the 1st one in to douse the fire. It's getting creepy, dude.

Glad I am not the only one noticing that.

It's been going on for a while with nearly a one for one correlation.

(11-08-2017 02:24 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Hearsay and the National Enquirer? John Edwards not withstanding, I'd advise against buying too much stock in this one.

Every thread involving a pedo claim you are the 1st one in to douse the fire. It's getting creepy, dude.

He's just a die hard liberal. He knows there are many bodies buried under the pedo blanket. He's trying to get out in front.

(11-08-2017 02:24 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:07 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Hearsay and the National Enquirer? John Edwards not withstanding, I'd advise against buying too much stock in this one.

Every thread involving a pedo claim you are the 1st one in to douse the fire. It's getting creepy, dude.

What do you expect? He's a Demon-crap supporter. If it's illegal, immoral, or corrupt, he'll defend it.