(11-09-2017 08:30 AM)MeanGreenRob27 Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 11:43 AM)MonGNARch Wrote:  My only peeve about it is that there are 5 "feathers" on each side, when in reality the logo has 3 for the wing. I know the other two are from the wing in the back but still. It's still a pretty BA helmet

It's literally the same logo. There are the 5 wing feathers on top and the 3 tail feathers at the bottom.

It's not the same logo. It looks like the Giant's hand print after he headslapped the hell out of you before he went back up the beanstalk.

Look, the OP said judge for yourself. Some like it. Some don't. If you don't want individual feedback, then don't ask for it. Most other people love it. Good for you guys and them. I personally think it looks like crap compared to your other helmets.

(11-09-2017 09:46 AM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(11-09-2017 08:30 AM)MeanGreenRob27 Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 11:43 AM)MonGNARch Wrote:  My only peeve about it is that there are 5 "feathers" on each side, when in reality the logo has 3 for the wing. I know the other two are from the wing in the back but still. It's still a pretty BA helmet

It's literally the same logo. There are the 5 wing feathers on top and the 3 tail feathers at the bottom.

It's not the same logo.

Definitely not the same logo

(11-09-2017 10:30 AM)MGNation92 Wrote:  

(11-09-2017 09:46 AM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(11-09-2017 08:30 AM)MeanGreenRob27 Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 11:43 AM)MonGNARch Wrote:  My only peeve about it is that there are 5 "feathers" on each side, when in reality the logo has 3 for the wing. I know the other two are from the wing in the back but still. It's still a pretty BA helmet

It's literally the same logo. There are the 5 wing feathers on top and the 3 tail feathers at the bottom.

It's not the same logo.

Definitely not the same logo

All people are saying is on the logo you have to show the other sides feathers because you would see them. On a helmet you could have done one wing on one side and one on the other. Would have made it "anatomically" correct. And it's not the same logo as Oregon's at all. That what they're arguing. It's pretty sharp, I like it.

Like Thunder said, some like it, some don't. And I figure some will say they don't like it but do, because, well, that's the nature of sports boards.

Yeah, sorry guys. I think I was being a bit harsh when I said it looks like crap.... It doesn't look like crap, but it's my least favorite of UNT's helmets that I can remember.

(11-09-2017 10:30 AM)MGNation92 Wrote:  

(11-09-2017 09:46 AM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(11-09-2017 08:30 AM)MeanGreenRob27 Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 11:43 AM)MonGNARch Wrote:  My only peeve about it is that there are 5 "feathers" on each side, when in reality the logo has 3 for the wing. I know the other two are from the wing in the back but still. It's still a pretty BA helmet

It's literally the same logo. There are the 5 wing feathers on top and the 3 tail feathers at the bottom.

It's not the same logo.

Definitely not the same logo

So because the sticker on the green helmet is chrome I️ didn’t see the tail being included on the helmet. That makes it look even cooler haha. And now that I️ see it being included I’m 100% okay with having the back wings present, as it completes the look. However I️ do think that if you ever do wings on the helmet like the Philadelphia Eagles it should only be three per side to make it look “right.” But what you have now is pretty legit


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I can't believe this thread has turned into 3 pages of arguing over the merits of our new helmet. Why not just wait until we see it on Saturday?

Anytime someone posts an opinion piece in this forum.... whaddya
,expect? Lol. Be glad you're being talked about... lol

l think were wearing chartreuse helmets with buzzard stickers on the sides.

Who cares! Just win.

(11-09-2017 10:30 AM)MGNation92 Wrote:  

(11-09-2017 09:46 AM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(11-09-2017 08:30 AM)MeanGreenRob27 Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 11:43 AM)MonGNARch Wrote:  My only peeve about it is that there are 5 "feathers" on each side, when in reality the logo has 3 for the wing. I know the other two are from the wing in the back but still. It's still a pretty BA helmet

It's literally the same logo. There are the 5 wing feathers on top and the 3 tail feathers at the bottom.

It's not the same logo.

Definitely not the same logo

It's the same exact logo. The head is just cut off.

What about the old school, flying wiener logo?

(11-10-2017 12:10 PM)MeanGreenRob27 Wrote:  

(11-09-2017 10:30 AM)MGNation92 Wrote:  

(11-09-2017 09:46 AM)THUNDERGround Wrote:  

(11-09-2017 08:30 AM)MeanGreenRob27 Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 11:43 AM)MonGNARch Wrote:  My only peeve about it is that there are 5 "feathers" on each side, when in reality the logo has 3 for the wing. I know the other two are from the wing in the back but still. It's still a pretty BA helmet

It's literally the same logo. There are the 5 wing feathers on top and the 3 tail feathers at the bottom.

It's not the same logo.

Definitely not the same logo

It's the same exact logo. The head is just cut off.

If you think those feathers look like the ones on that helmet, then if I were you, I'd find the nearest optometrist asap.

Apparently the face mask is also chrome to match the wings.

I am not a fan of uniform designs changing constantly, but the new chrome and frosted green helmets looked great.

(11-12-2017 05:34 AM)Adler Wrote:  I am not a fan of uniform designs changing constantly, but the new chrome and frosted green helmets looked great.

Totally agree. And, I think this combo looked even better in person last night. We should wear it often.

Quack! Quack! Quack! Quack!

(11-12-2017 12:00 PM)MTPiKapp Wrote:  Quack! Quack! Quack! Quack!

I think you dont know animals....ducks go quack, not eagles