(11-08-2017 06:01 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:54 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:12 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:10 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:08 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  And that means what?

It means Americans did NOT speak loud and clear (for trump). We've already covered this. Only 60 some percent of those age eligible voted and the ones that did voted more for other people than for donald. Why is this so hard to understand? Or are you being purposefully obtuse?

Yeah, I know.

Nor did Americans speak loud and clear for HilLIARY. Neither candidate garnered 50%+1.

What we do know is that the states spoke loud and clear.

Thus, President Trump.


But by all means, the left is more than welcome to console themselves with their moral victory.

Here's an idea: run her again.

No one is looking for ways to console anything! Again, we're just dealing in the reality that the majority of Americans did not vote for him nor do they approve of his job performance now. These are all facts, just like trump winning the EC. Why do you and other keeps going on and on with this ridiculous narrative? Just end it already.

The more you try to prop up these fantasies, like trump won some mandate, the more you look like him. Dishonest. He has a way of bringing all those around him down. But by all means, stick with that. And you'll end up with a whole lot more Virginia's before this is done.

Wanna bet? Lol

I like that this dipshit Trump, Laura Ingram , Hannity and Rush are the republican party now.

Maybe a real conservative party will form. Without the fake patriotism that dislikes corporate welfare as much as welfare. That stops loaning out our military and bankrupted our country.
Bernie and his magic trees for free college 52 billion.
Chump and his too expensive wall 26 billion .
We can not afford those things but increased defense spending by 80 billion.

While Japan has a part time army and invest in infrastructure.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

(11-08-2017 06:22 PM)MJG Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 06:01 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:54 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:12 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:10 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  It means Americans did NOT speak loud and clear (for trump). We've already covered this. Only 60 some percent of those age eligible voted and the ones that did voted more for other people than for donald. Why is this so hard to understand? Or are you being purposefully obtuse?

Yeah, I know.

Nor did Americans speak loud and clear for HilLIARY. Neither candidate garnered 50%+1.

What we do know is that the states spoke loud and clear.

Thus, President Trump.


But by all means, the left is more than welcome to console themselves with their moral victory.

Here's an idea: run her again.

No one is looking for ways to console anything! Again, we're just dealing in the reality that the majority of Americans did not vote for him nor do they approve of his job performance now. These are all facts, just like trump winning the EC. Why do you and other keeps going on and on with this ridiculous narrative? Just end it already.

The more you try to prop up these fantasies, like trump won some mandate, the more you look like him. Dishonest. He has a way of bringing all those around him down. But by all means, stick with that. And you'll end up with a whole lot more Virginia's before this is done.

Wanna bet? Lol

I like that this dipshit Trump, Laura Ingram , Hannity and Rush are the republican party now.

Maybe a real conservative party will form. Without the fake patriotism that dislikes corporate welfare as much as welfare. That stops loaning out our military and bankrupted our country.
Bernie and his magic trees for free college 52 billion.
Chump and his too expensive wall 26 billion .
We can not afford those things but increased defense spending by 80 billion.

While Japan has a part time army and invest in infrastructure.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

If only Trump hated America as much as Obama did.

(11-08-2017 06:01 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:54 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:12 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:10 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:08 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  And that means what?

It means Americans did NOT speak loud and clear (for trump). We've already covered this. Only 60 some percent of those age eligible voted and the ones that did voted more for other people than for donald. Why is this so hard to understand? Or are you being purposefully obtuse?

Yeah, I know.

Nor did Americans speak loud and clear for HilLIARY. Neither candidate garnered 50%+1.

What we do know is that the states spoke loud and clear.

Thus, President Trump.


But by all means, the left is more than welcome to console themselves with their moral victory.

Here's an idea: run her again.

No one is looking for ways to console anything! Again, we're just dealing in the reality that the majority of Americans did not vote for him nor do they approve of his job performance now. These are all facts, just like trump winning the EC. Why do you and other keeps going on and on with this ridiculous narrative? Just end it already.

The more you try to prop up these fantasies, like trump won some mandate, the more you look like him. Dishonest. He has a way of bringing all those around him down. But by all means, stick with that. And you'll end up with a whole lot more Virginia's before this is done.

Wanna bet? Lol

What's your point? That the GOP backlash is so strong that the Republican candidate for senator in Alabama isn't a shoe-in?

(11-08-2017 01:54 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:12 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:10 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:08 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 09:59 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  Except that Trump didn't even win the popular vote.

And that means what?

It means Americans did NOT speak loud and clear (for trump). We've already covered this. Only 60 some percent of those age eligible voted and the ones that did voted more for other people than for donald. Why is this so hard to understand? Or are you being purposefully obtuse?

Yeah, I know.

Nor did Americans speak loud and clear for HilLIARY. Neither candidate garnered 50%+1.

What we do know is that the states spoke loud and clear.

Thus, President Trump.


But by all means, the left is more than welcome to console themselves with their moral victory.

Here's an idea: run her again.

No one is looking for ways to console anything! Again, we're just dealing in the reality that the majority of Americans did not vote for him nor do they approve of his job performance now. These are all facts, just like trump winning the EC. Why do you and other keeps going on and on with this ridiculous narrative? Just end it already.

The more you try to prop up these fantasies, like trump won some mandate, the more you look like him. Dishonest. He has a way of bringing all those around him down. But by all means, stick with that. And you'll end up with a whole lot more Virginia's before this is done.

I will say it again:

No 2016 candidate won 50%+1.

Every single candidate had more votes AGAINST than FOR.


Popularity has nothing to do with anything other than making one side or the other feel good.

(11-08-2017 07:38 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:54 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:12 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:10 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:08 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  And that means what?

It means Americans did NOT speak loud and clear (for trump). We've already covered this. Only 60 some percent of those age eligible voted and the ones that did voted more for other people than for donald. Why is this so hard to understand? Or are you being purposefully obtuse?

Yeah, I know.

Nor did Americans speak loud and clear for HilLIARY. Neither candidate garnered 50%+1.

What we do know is that the states spoke loud and clear.

Thus, President Trump.


But by all means, the left is more than welcome to console themselves with their moral victory.

Here's an idea: run her again.

No one is looking for ways to console anything! Again, we're just dealing in the reality that the majority of Americans did not vote for him nor do they approve of his job performance now. These are all facts, just like trump winning the EC. Why do you and other keeps going on and on with this ridiculous narrative? Just end it already.

The more you try to prop up these fantasies, like trump won some mandate, the more you look like him. Dishonest. He has a way of bringing all those around him down. But by all means, stick with that. And you'll end up with a whole lot more Virginia's before this is done.

I will say it again:

No 2016 candidate won 50%+1.

Every single candidate had more votes AGAINST than FOR.


Popularity has nothing to do with anything other than making one side or the other feel good.

Yea. Based on this dumb fallacy of “logic” no one at all won in 1992.

43
37
19

But, funny thing happened on the way to the runoff...

Bubba ran away with a WHOPPING 370 Shhhhh!!!!,

electoral college votes...

They didn’t seem to be crying about the EC then...

(11-09-2017 08:58 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 07:38 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:54 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:12 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:10 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  It means Americans did NOT speak loud and clear (for trump). We've already covered this. Only 60 some percent of those age eligible voted and the ones that did voted more for other people than for donald. Why is this so hard to understand? Or are you being purposefully obtuse?

Yeah, I know.

Nor did Americans speak loud and clear for HilLIARY. Neither candidate garnered 50%+1.

What we do know is that the states spoke loud and clear.

Thus, President Trump.


But by all means, the left is more than welcome to console themselves with their moral victory.

Here's an idea: run her again.

No one is looking for ways to console anything! Again, we're just dealing in the reality that the majority of Americans did not vote for him nor do they approve of his job performance now. These are all facts, just like trump winning the EC. Why do you and other keeps going on and on with this ridiculous narrative? Just end it already.

The more you try to prop up these fantasies, like trump won some mandate, the more you look like him. Dishonest. He has a way of bringing all those around him down. But by all means, stick with that. And you'll end up with a whole lot more Virginia's before this is done.

I will say it again:

No 2016 candidate won 50%+1.

Every single candidate had more votes AGAINST than FOR.


Popularity has nothing to do with anything other than making one side or the other feel good.

Yea. Based on this dumb fallacy of “logic” no one at all won in 1992.

43
37
19

But, funny thing happened on the way to the runoff...

Bubba ran away with a WHOPPING 370 Shhhhh!!!!,

electoral college votes...

They didn’t seem to be crying about the EC then...

And we're not crying about the EC now! What in the world is your aversion to facts presented right in front of your face? You just completely ignore them and continue on with the bull****.

(11-09-2017 10:04 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2017 08:58 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 07:38 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:54 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-08-2017 01:12 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  Yeah, I know.

Nor did Americans speak loud and clear for HilLIARY. Neither candidate garnered 50%+1.

What we do know is that the states spoke loud and clear.

Thus, President Trump.


But by all means, the left is more than welcome to console themselves with their moral victory.

Here's an idea: run her again.

No one is looking for ways to console anything! Again, we're just dealing in the reality that the majority of Americans did not vote for him nor do they approve of his job performance now. These are all facts, just like trump winning the EC. Why do you and other keeps going on and on with this ridiculous narrative? Just end it already.

The more you try to prop up these fantasies, like trump won some mandate, the more you look like him. Dishonest. He has a way of bringing all those around him down. But by all means, stick with that. And you'll end up with a whole lot more Virginia's before this is done.

I will say it again:

No 2016 candidate won 50%+1.

Every single candidate had more votes AGAINST than FOR.


Popularity has nothing to do with anything other than making one side or the other feel good.

Yea. Based on this dumb fallacy of “logic” no one at all won in 1992.

43
37
19

But, funny thing happened on the way to the runoff...

Bubba ran away with a WHOPPING 370 Shhhhh!!!!,

electoral college votes...

They didn’t seem to be crying about the EC then...

And we're not crying about the EC now! What in the world is your aversion to facts presented right in front of your face? You just completely ignore them and continue on with the bull****.

Who peed in your Cheerios?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk