(10-31-2017 08:33 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 08:30 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 08:17 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 08:04 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  The contention that there is “NO COLLUSION” became even less compelling a few minutes after the Manafort and Gates indictments when Mueller unveiled another blockbuster indictment: Former campaign foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos pled guilty to lying to FBI agents about his efforts to solicit “dirt” on Hillary Clinton from an unnamed “professor” in London who was closely connected to the Kremlin. According to the indictment, “The Professor” told Papadopoulos in April 2016 that the Russians “ ‘have dirt on her’; ‘the Russians had emails of Clinton’; ‘they have thousands of emails.’”

You can spin and be as delusional as you want to be, but anyone with a brain that isn't diseased like yours with so much hate since last November, knows there hasn't been one tiny bit of collusion proved by President Trump. You keep posting though, the entertainment value of your mental melt down drip by drip is truly priceless.

I'm genuinely confused here, are you not aware of the admission that Don Jr made concerning a meeting which included Jared Kushner and Paul Manafort, and people known to them as representing Russian interest. A meeting which was set up to discuss the transfer of information harmful to the Clinton campaign and which Russian sanctions were brought up? We now have a second Trump staffer, who is providing documentation and testimony, which further shows those leading Trumps campaign actively sought out Russian information on Hillary and which showed a desire for the campaign to keep this contact hidden.

Argue that there isn't direct proof of criminal collusion all you want, we'll see ultimately what evidence there is, but this feigned "OH YOU SILLY LIB, THERE'S NO EVIDENCE" position is objectively absurd.

Well at least you're able to laugh at your own ridiculousness.

(10-31-2017 08:30 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 08:17 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 08:04 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  The contention that there is “NO COLLUSION” became even less compelling a few minutes after the Manafort and Gates indictments when Mueller unveiled another blockbuster indictment: Former campaign foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos pled guilty to lying to FBI agents about his efforts to solicit “dirt” on Hillary Clinton from an unnamed “professor” in London who was closely connected to the Kremlin. According to the indictment, “The Professor” told Papadopoulos in April 2016 that the Russians “ ‘have dirt on her’; ‘the Russians had emails of Clinton’; ‘they have thousands of emails.’”

You can spin and be as delusional as you want to be, but anyone with a brain that isn't diseased like yours with so much hate since last November, knows there hasn't been one tiny bit of collusion proved by President Trump. You keep posting though, the entertainment value of your mental melt down drip by drip is truly priceless.

I'm genuinely confused here, are you not aware of the admission that Don Jr made concerning a meeting which included Jared Kushner and Paul Manafort, and people known to them as representing Russian interest. A meeting which was set up to discuss the transfer of information harmful to the Clinton campaign and which Russian sanctions were brought up? We now have a second Trump staffer, who is providing documentation and testimony, which further shows those leading Trumps campaign actively sought out Russian information on Hillary and which showed a desire for the campaign to keep this contact hidden.

Argue that there isn't direct proof of criminal collusion all you want, we'll see ultimately what evidence there is, but this feigned "OH YOU SILLY LIB, THERE'S NO EVIDENCE" position is objectively absurd.

What, in this context is “collusion”?!?

Even better, what is “criminal collusion”?!?

Can you cite the law that would be involved here?

Thx.

Glad to know Trump supporters are offended by a knee, but don't mind treason.

(11-01-2017 12:44 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  Glad to know Trump supporters are offended by a knee, but don't mind treason.

Proof?

Proof?


Your eyes...

Next thing the Trumpmadministration is going to say campaign manager Manafort had nothing to do with the campaign. He got the coffee for others.......

How in the hell hasn’t Trump been brought up on charges yet?

You guys know we had some intelligence operators compromised? This out of the God and Country party? What in the hell has happened to you guys? Read or watch something other than Fox News and right wing web sites.

(11-01-2017 05:45 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Proof?




How in the hell hasn’t Trump been brought up on charges yet?

Because, right now, it still requires some evidence to bring charges.

I realize the lunatic left and all its witch hunters are trying to change that, but until then, it's going to require more than a fake dossier and a 10 month temper tantrum to justify charges.

Here's the money shot boys..................... Collusion and COVER UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Four weeks later, on May 21, Papadopoulos emailed Paul Manafort, who was then Trump’s campaign chairman (and has now been indicted on tax fraud charges), to reiterate that Russia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs was “eager to meet Mr. Trump.” Manafort forwarded the email to another Trump campaign official, Rick Gates (who has since been indicted alongside Manafort), with a note attached. “Let’s discuss,” said the note. “We need someone to communicate that DT is not doing these trips. It should be someone low level in the campaign so as not to send any signal.”


I WOULD LOVE ONE OF YOU TO ATTEMPT TO WEASEL OUT OF THAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Try to explain that email GDunn, JMU, Owl 69. You guys have some shreds of credibility left don't you? I have faith in you guys to see the right thing..................

PLUS ALL THE OTHER SHYT..............................

DJT Jr.
Those Congress critters spelling it out on the tape recorder
The Steele Dossier

It absolutely amazes me Trump still has a job............... He should be in handcuffs.................

Was Manafort tied to the campaign at all? Someone bring me up to speed.

(11-01-2017 06:56 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Here's the money shot boys..................... Collusion and COVER UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Four weeks later, on May 21, Papadopoulos emailed Paul Manafort, who was then Trump’s campaign chairman (and has now been indicted on tax fraud charges), to reiterate that Russia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs was “eager to meet Mr. Trump.” Manafort forwarded the email to another Trump campaign official, Rick Gates (who has since been indicted alongside Manafort), with a note attached. “Let’s discuss,” said the note. “We need someone to communicate that DT is not doing these trips. It should be someone low level in the campaign so as not to send any signal.”


I WOULD LOVE ONE OF YOU TO ATTEMPT TO WEASEL OUT OF THAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Try to explain that email GDunn, JMU, Owl 69. You guys have some shreds of credibility left don't you? I have faith in you guys to see the right thing..................

Which laws, exactly, would have been violated if Trump himself had met with the minister of whatever you’re talking about?

What does COLLUSION!!! even mean, what are the sentencing guidelines?

And who was covering up what? You have the freaking email(s) right there...

No bleach bit needed.

(11-01-2017 06:56 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Here's the money shot boys..................... Collusion and COVER UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Four weeks later, on May 21, Papadopoulos emailed Paul Manafort, who was then Trump’s campaign chairman (and has now been indicted on tax fraud charges), to reiterate that Russia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs was “eager to meet Mr. Trump.” Manafort forwarded the email to another Trump campaign official, Rick Gates (who has since been indicted alongside Manafort), with a note attached. “Let’s discuss,” said the note. “We need someone to communicate that DT is not doing these trips. It should be someone low level in the campaign so as not to send any signal.”


I WOULD LOVE ONE OF YOU TO ATTEMPT TO WEASEL OUT OF THAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Try to explain that email GDunn, JMU, Owl 69. You guys have some shreds of credibility left don't you? I have faith in you guys to see the right thing..................

You know if they had taken the meeting it wouldn't have been illegal, right?

We agree then..... When is he getting impeached?

It's against the law to use a hostiles country's intelligence services to hack into the DNC and then use it as oppositional research. I agree they have the goods. I can not believe that we don't have riots in the streets. Just goes to show you the power of the right wing media. A Democrat would have been impeached months ago.

(11-01-2017 05:37 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(11-01-2017 12:44 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  Glad to know Trump supporters are offended by a knee, but don't mind treason.

Proof?

http://www.newsweek.com/trump-voters-wan...ows-697871

You know if they had taken the meeting it wouldn't have been illegal, right?



WHAAAATTTTTTT????????????????????????????

So we've went from no collusion. You don't have proof of collusion. Muh Russia. To it's not illegal if they did.

Let me tell you what is illegal. Obstruction of Justice......................

Most of his supporters (75 percent) believe the Russia collusion story is just “fake news,” and a larger majority (79 percent) believe the president should remain in office even if it is discovered there was collusion between members of his campaign team and Russia during the election. Just 11 percent of supporters believe the president should step down under those circumstances.

The power of Fox News.....................

(11-01-2017 07:55 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  We agree then..... When is he getting impeached?

It's against the law to use a hostiles country's intelligence services to hack into the DNC and then use it as oppositional research.

Honestly the first time I've heard that Trump's campaign did this. Do you have sources?

(11-01-2017 07:55 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  I agree they have the goods. I can not believe that we don't have riots in the streets.

Only riots are coming from fringe left groups and fascist on college campuses that are trying to silence conservative speakers.

(11-01-2017 07:55 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Just goes to show you the power of the right wing media. A Democrat would have been impeached months ago.

Not with the stunning lack of evidence. One time there was a democrat president that faced impeachment with clear evidence against him. He wasn't impeached.

Post 47 200.

Post 47

If it were to come to light that Russian officials did consult Trump campaign officials about the timing or tactics of the release of the stolen emails, that could raise the possibility of conspiracy charges under Section 1030 of Title 18, which bars unauthorized computer intrusions, specialists said.

From July. An article on DJT Jr.'s meetings............

The guy is toast....... or should be but it's obviously the law and order party. The gang that investigated whitewater. The hounds of hell and defenders of freedom doesn't mind if their guy commits treason. He aids the enemy as we speak. He's easily black mailed. It's disgusting what the right gets away with. This would NEVER HAPPEN FOR A D. NEVER.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/11/us/po...paign.html

"Not with the stunning lack of evidence."

Wake the F up.........................

Mach is literally ruining this board. He's gone bat **** crazy.