(10-30-2017 08:35 PM)hburg Wrote:  The elitist Dems and the Republican elites are like "yay we hate Trump," in reality, America is saying, yay, the corrupt colluders known as the Clintons, Obama's, the Bush's are all being exposed for the corrupt individuals they are. The fact that the investigation refuses to focus on the corruption by the elitist says it all.

I will vote for Trump because the elites hate him. That means he is doing something right by exposing their pyramid schemes known as the deep state.

Indeed. The more Trump gets it from both sides, the more you know he's on the right track.

LOL, the alt-left's case now hinges on Nick Papagiorgio from Yuma, Arizona. He's into software, but once volunteered for the Trump campaign.

(10-30-2017 09:20 PM)Kronke Wrote:  LOL, the alt-left's case now hinges on Nick Papagiorgio from Yuma, Arizona. He's into software, but once volunteered for the Trump campaign.

It's gonna be like losing the election all over again. Lol

(10-30-2017 07:17 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  You guys can’t be this stupid. The Papadopoulos dude pled guilty to collusion and he’s cooperating. It’s ovahhhhhh. Get real. Welcome to Earth third planet from the sun.

For Demoncrafts it is. Welcome to future hell. It's only starting.

Mueller has served up a big fat nothing burger..

Page, whom MSNBC host Chris Hayes congratulated on “not being indicted” himself at the start of the segment, was asked if he had met Papadopoulos and if they were on emails together when they were both working for the Trump campaign. Page said they had met “briefly a couple of times early in the campaign” and, when pressed, said they were on “probably a few emails” together.

“Perhaps, yeah,” he told Hayes when asked again if such messages exist. Asked twice if those emails mentioned Russia in any capacity, Page said, “It may have come up from time to time,” though he specified such references included “nothing major.”

I just wonder. Trump's victory was pretty impressive, to the point that it's driven several people on the left crazy. One has to wonder if this isn't a way to find out how he was able to flip states. I mean why not, they used Fusion GPS as a political weapon. I'm sorry as opposition research.

Boys boys boys boys.

Who do you think the DT is in Manafort’s email? You have his sons taking meetings. You have the GOP congressmen on tape think that Putin buys off Trump and Rohrbacher. You have people in the campaign now pleading guilty to collusion. Talking with the Russians. You have Carter Page above admitting to being on email chains with Papa discussing Russia. There is a pro ponder ace of evidence at this point. Roger Stone telling twitter watch Wiki Leaks for Podesta emails to drop.


You are all in denial.

Mach. Breathe.

(10-31-2017 06:47 AM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Boys boys boys boys.

Who do you think the DT is in Manafort’s email? You have his sons taking meetings. You have the GOP congressmen on tape think that Putin buys off Trump and Rohrbacher. You have people in the campaign now pleading guilty to collusion. Talking with the Russians. You have Carter Page above admitting to being on email chains with Papa discussing Russia. There is a pro ponder ace of evidence at this point. Roger Stone telling twitter watch Wiki Leaks for Podesta emails to drop.


You are all in denial.

That would be interesting if true. Too bad for you it isn't.

Hilary is the real issue. Hilary is the real issue. Stop investigating me.

(10-31-2017 06:14 AM)gdunn Wrote:  I just wonder. Trump's victory was pretty impressive, to the point that it's driven several people on the left crazy. One has to wonder if this isn't a way to find out how he was able to flip states. I mean why not, they used Fusion GPS as a political weapon. I'm sorry as opposition research.

Read all the "anthropological" articles. Nobody in Democratic leadership has ever lived in a blue collar neighborhood or rural community. It was obvious to anyone who had ever truly experienced diversity in their lives. But they are run by a bunch of people from academia or from "white privilege."

"Read it in an op-ed, so it must be true".

(10-31-2017 08:07 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 06:14 AM)gdunn Wrote:  I just wonder. Trump's victory was pretty impressive, to the point that it's driven several people on the left crazy. One has to wonder if this isn't a way to find out how he was able to flip states. I mean why not, they used Fusion GPS as a political weapon. I'm sorry as opposition research.

Read all the "anthropological" articles. Nobody in Democratic leadership has ever lived in a blue collar neighborhood or rural community. It was obvious to anyone who had ever truly experienced diversity in their lives. But they are run by a bunch of people from academia or from "white privilege."

true....this comes to mind.....skip to the last 30 secs.....

(10-30-2017 07:45 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  “DT will not go to Russia. We will send a low level campaign staffer to not raise awareness. “


Seriously in a Manafort email.......

Troublesome at least..........


It’s oooovvvahhhhh

Just too damn cute.

The contention that there is “NO COLLUSION” became even less compelling a few minutes after the Manafort and Gates indictments when Mueller unveiled another blockbuster indictment: Former campaign foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos pled guilty to lying to FBI agents about his efforts to solicit “dirt” on Hillary Clinton from an unnamed “professor” in London who was closely connected to the Kremlin. According to the indictment, “The Professor” told Papadopoulos in April 2016 that the Russians “ ‘have dirt on her’; ‘the Russians had emails of Clinton’; ‘they have thousands of emails.’”

To those of you who still buy into the "BUT HILLARY!", why do you think she's actually committed crimes that could be prosecuted despite the fact Trump is in office and she is not being prosecuted? Doesn't it at all make you question the motives of the Trump administration that they seem to bring up Clinton to deflect responsibility, as if they aren't the very people responsible for prosecuting any of those supposed crimes?

(10-31-2017 08:04 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  The contention that there is “NO COLLUSION” became even less compelling a few minutes after the Manafort and Gates indictments when Mueller unveiled another blockbuster indictment: Former campaign foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos pled guilty to lying to FBI agents about his efforts to solicit “dirt” on Hillary Clinton from an unnamed “professor” in London who was closely connected to the Kremlin. According to the indictment, “The Professor” told Papadopoulos in April 2016 that the Russians “ ‘have dirt on her’; ‘the Russians had emails of Clinton’; ‘they have thousands of emails.’”

You can spin and be as delusional as you want to be, but anyone with a brain that isn't diseased like yours with so much hate since last November, knows there hasn't been one tiny bit of collusion proved by President Trump. You keep posting though, the entertainment value of your mental melt down drip by drip is truly priceless.

(10-31-2017 08:17 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 08:04 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  The contention that there is “NO COLLUSION” became even less compelling a few minutes after the Manafort and Gates indictments when Mueller unveiled another blockbuster indictment: Former campaign foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos pled guilty to lying to FBI agents about his efforts to solicit “dirt” on Hillary Clinton from an unnamed “professor” in London who was closely connected to the Kremlin. According to the indictment, “The Professor” told Papadopoulos in April 2016 that the Russians “ ‘have dirt on her’; ‘the Russians had emails of Clinton’; ‘they have thousands of emails.’”

You can spin and be as delusional as you want to be, but anyone with a brain that isn't diseased like yours with so much hate since last November, knows there hasn't been one tiny bit of collusion proved by President Trump. You keep posting though, the entertainment value of your mental melt down drip by drip is truly priceless.

I'm genuinely confused here, are you not aware of the admission that Don Jr made concerning a meeting which included Jared Kushner and Paul Manafort, and people known to them as representing Russian interest. A meeting which was set up to discuss the transfer of information harmful to the Clinton campaign and which Russian sanctions were brought up? We now have a second Trump staffer, who is providing documentation and testimony, which further shows those leading Trumps campaign actively sought out Russian information on Hillary and which showed a desire for the campaign to keep this contact hidden.

Argue that there isn't direct proof of criminal collusion all you want, we'll see ultimately what evidence there is, but this feigned "OH YOU SILLY LIB, THERE'S NO EVIDENCE" position is objectively absurd.

(10-31-2017 08:30 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 08:17 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

(10-31-2017 08:04 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  The contention that there is “NO COLLUSION” became even less compelling a few minutes after the Manafort and Gates indictments when Mueller unveiled another blockbuster indictment: Former campaign foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos pled guilty to lying to FBI agents about his efforts to solicit “dirt” on Hillary Clinton from an unnamed “professor” in London who was closely connected to the Kremlin. According to the indictment, “The Professor” told Papadopoulos in April 2016 that the Russians “ ‘have dirt on her’; ‘the Russians had emails of Clinton’; ‘they have thousands of emails.’”

You can spin and be as delusional as you want to be, but anyone with a brain that isn't diseased like yours with so much hate since last November, knows there hasn't been one tiny bit of collusion proved by President Trump. You keep posting though, the entertainment value of your mental melt down drip by drip is truly priceless.

I'm genuinely confused here, are you not aware of the admission that Don Jr made concerning a meeting which included Jared Kushner and Paul Manafort, and people known to them as representing Russian interest. A meeting which was set up to discuss the transfer of information harmful to the Clinton campaign and which Russian sanctions were brought up? We now have a second Trump staffer, who is providing documentation and testimony, which further shows those leading Trumps campaign actively sought out Russian information on Hillary and which showed a desire for the campaign to keep this contact hidden.

Argue that there isn't direct proof of criminal collusion all you want, we'll see ultimately what evidence there is, but this feigned "OH YOU SILLY LIB, THERE'S NO EVIDENCE" position is objectively absurd.