Grassley wants a special counsel for the Uranium 1 deal. He has asked for someone in the DOJ who was not involved in Uranium 1 (which rules out Rosenstein & Muehller) and who is not currently recused (Sessions) to name one for the Uranium 1 deal.

This could be Muehller's undoing. Whens the last time we had a special counsel being actively investigated by another special counsel?

Checkmate. #17dChess



http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/...-deal.html

(10-25-2017 01:13 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Grassley wants a special counsel for the Uranium 1 deal. He has asked for someone in the DOJ who was not involved in Uranium 1 (which rules out Rosenstein & Muehller) and who is not currently recused (Sessions) to name one for the Uranium 1 deal.

This could be Muehller's undoing. Whens the last time we had a special counsel being actively investigated by another special counsel?

Checkmate. #17dChess



http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/...-deal.html

This can be the only choice and it must be investigated. The Clintons might be house shopping abroad right now, you know a country that will not extradite American criminals.

(10-25-2017 01:28 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 01:13 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Grassley wants a special counsel for the Uranium 1 deal. He has asked for someone in the DOJ who was not involved in Uranium 1 (which rules out Rosenstein & Muehller) and who is not currently recused (Sessions) to name one for the Uranium 1 deal.

This could be Muehller's undoing. Whens the last time we had a special counsel being actively investigated by another special counsel?

Checkmate. #17dChess



http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/...-deal.html

This can be the only choice and it must be investigated. The Clintons might be house shopping abroad right now, you know a country that will not extradite American criminals.

Russia comes to mind.

(10-25-2017 01:41 PM)q5sys Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 01:28 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 01:13 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Grassley wants a special counsel for the Uranium 1 deal. He has asked for someone in the DOJ who was not involved in Uranium 1 (which rules out Rosenstein & Muehller) and who is not currently recused (Sessions) to name one for the Uranium 1 deal.

This could be Muehller's undoing. Whens the last time we had a special counsel being actively investigated by another special counsel?

Checkmate. #17dChess



http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/...-deal.html

This can be the only choice and it must be investigated. The Clintons might be house shopping abroad right now, you know a country that will not extradite American criminals.

Russia comes to mind.

Cuba and Venezuela are nice this time of year.

(10-25-2017 02:19 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 01:41 PM)q5sys Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 01:28 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  The Clintons might be house shopping abroad right now, you know a country that will not extradite American criminals.

Russia comes to mind.

Cuba and Venezuela are nice this time of year.

An Ecuadorian embassy will do, in a pinch.

(10-25-2017 03:48 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 02:19 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 01:41 PM)q5sys Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 01:28 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  The Clintons might be house shopping abroad right now, you know a country that will not extradite American criminals.

Russia comes to mind.

Cuba and Venezuela are nice this time of year.

An Ecuadorian embassy will do, in a pinch.

Speaking of that, looks like the Swedish guy who claimed that Assange was a rapist just got arrested for rape, lots of prior claims coming in also.

(10-25-2017 01:13 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Grassley wants a special counsel for the Uranium 1 deal. He has asked for someone in the DOJ who was not involved in Uranium 1 (which rules out Rosenstein & Muehller) and who is not currently recused (Sessions) to name one for the Uranium 1 deal.

This could be Muehller's undoing. Whens the last time we had a special counsel being actively investigated by another special counsel?

Checkmate. #17dChess



http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/...-deal.html

Perhaps the GOP has finally come to understand that they cannot continue to fight the dems on their own terms and have adopted some dem strategies?

(10-25-2017 03:52 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 03:48 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 02:19 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 01:41 PM)q5sys Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 01:28 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  The Clintons might be house shopping abroad right now, you know a country that will not extradite American criminals.

Russia comes to mind.

Cuba and Venezuela are nice this time of year.

An Ecuadorian embassy will do, in a pinch.

Speaking of that, looks like the Swedish guy who claimed that Assange was a rapist just got arrested for rape, lots of prior claims coming in also.

I must have watched that GIF 40 times, no wait, 41, uh 42, 43 44 45 70 times.

(10-25-2017 04:06 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 03:52 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 03:48 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 02:19 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 01:41 PM)q5sys Wrote:  Russia comes to mind.

Cuba and Venezuela are nice this time of year.

An Ecuadorian embassy will do, in a pinch.

Speaking of that, looks like the Swedish guy who claimed that Assange was a rapist just got arrested for rape, lots of prior claims coming in also.

I must have watched that GIF 40 times, no wait, 41, uh 42, 43 44 45 70 times.

I think my screen burnt in.

(10-25-2017 04:06 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 03:52 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 03:48 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 02:19 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 01:41 PM)q5sys Wrote:  Russia comes to mind.

Cuba and Venezuela are nice this time of year.

An Ecuadorian embassy will do, in a pinch.

Speaking of that, looks like the Swedish guy who claimed that Assange was a rapist just got arrested for rape, lots of prior claims coming in also.

I must have watched that GIF 40 times, no wait, 41, uh 42, 43 44 45 70 times.

(10-25-2017 02:19 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 01:41 PM)q5sys Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 01:28 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 01:13 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Grassley wants a special counsel for the Uranium 1 deal. He has asked for someone in the DOJ who was not involved in Uranium 1 (which rules out Rosenstein & Muehller) and who is not currently recused (Sessions) to name one for the Uranium 1 deal.

This could be Muehller's undoing. Whens the last time we had a special counsel being actively investigated by another special counsel?

Checkmate. #17dChess



http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/...-deal.html

This can be the only choice and it must be investigated. The Clintons might be house shopping abroad right now, you know a country that will not extradite American criminals.

Russia comes to mind.

Cuba and Venezuela are nice this time of year.

Yea, but they lack the Irony of 'muh russians' if Hillary flees there.

(10-25-2017 01:13 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Grassley wants a special counsel for the Uranium 1 deal. He has asked for someone in the DOJ who was not involved in Uranium 1 (which rules out Rosenstein & Muehller) and who is not currently recused (Sessions) to name one for the Uranium 1 deal.

This could be Muehller's undoing. Whens the last time we had a special counsel being actively investigated by another special counsel?

Checkmate. #17dChess



http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/...-deal.html

Muehller should resign. Rosenstein should have been gone...

Appoint Mach!

(10-25-2017 05:32 PM)No Bull Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 01:13 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Grassley wants a special counsel for the Uranium 1 deal. He has asked for someone in the DOJ who was not involved in Uranium 1 (which rules out Rosenstein & Muehller) and who is not currently recused (Sessions) to name one for the Uranium 1 deal.

This could be Muehller's undoing. Whens the last time we had a special counsel being actively investigated by another special counsel?

Checkmate. #17dChess



http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/...-deal.html

Muehller should resign. Rosenstein should have been gone...

If Mueller didn't resign from the very beginning why do you think now would be a good time for him? He should have been fired. Or better yet, seeing how he was involved or there were hints that he was involved in the same corruption that they want to pin Trump with he should have NEVER been appointed. Stupid Republicans, that's why they were losing prior to Trump because they have no sense or perhaps they don't have the evil in them that the Demons have.

(10-25-2017 05:32 PM)No Bull Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 01:13 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Grassley wants a special counsel for the Uranium 1 deal. He has asked for someone in the DOJ who was not involved in Uranium 1 (which rules out Rosenstein & Muehller) and who is not currently recused (Sessions) to name one for the Uranium 1 deal.

This could be Muehller's undoing. Whens the last time we had a special counsel being actively investigated by another special counsel?

Checkmate. #17dChess



http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/...-deal.html

Muehller should resign. Rosenstein should have been gone...

Agreed. How Mueller can investigate himself, and Rosenstein having appointed him in the first place when they are ALL neck deep in this crap is astounding.

This, folks, is the swamp. Only it’s a benevolent swamp. Instead of predators and prey, it’s more like some fairy tale land of critter Kum-by-ya.

They all watching each other’s backs and toasting themselves with glasses of chilled Pino and little sandwiches with the crust trimmed off.

You know, not the stuff of us “little” people.

Drain the frackin swamp.

(10-26-2017 06:08 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 05:32 PM)No Bull Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 01:13 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Grassley wants a special counsel for the Uranium 1 deal. He has asked for someone in the DOJ who was not involved in Uranium 1 (which rules out Rosenstein & Muehller) and who is not currently recused (Sessions) to name one for the Uranium 1 deal.

This could be Muehller's undoing. Whens the last time we had a special counsel being actively investigated by another special counsel?

Checkmate. #17dChess



http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/...-deal.html

Muehller should resign. Rosenstein should have been gone...

Agreed. How Mueller can investigate himself, and Rosenstein having appointed him in the first place when they are ALL neck deep in this crap is astounding.

This, folks, is the swamp. Only it’s a benevolent swamp. Instead of predators and prey, it’s more like some fairy tale land of critter Kum-by-ya.

They all watching each other’s backs and toasting themselves with glasses of chilled Pino and little sandwiches with the crust trimmed off.

You know, not the stuff of us “little” people.

Drain the frackin swamp.

that's XACLY! what the focus should be.....

the train is full steam ahead rollin'....