You were saying.

Now this is how it works. I made a claim. Parts of the dossier have been verified.

Here is my evidence of that claim.

https://globalsecurityreview.com/u-s-off...om-allies/

Now I will continue to look for links that support that evidence.

Here is what you call support:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/...57286.html

Now I know this is foreign to many of you who seem so enthralled in making baseless claims. Take for example this thread. They make a claim that Trump has been vindicated. That is laughable at best a lie at its worst. Trump claimed the FBI, Clinton, and Russia paid for the dossier. This is simply not true.

(10-25-2017 05:32 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  GB

No where has anyone cited any evidence of it being discredited.

FACT

If you have any evidence please present.

Where is the proof that it is creditable. And no, CNN saying that some of it has been verified. Unless you can show me what some of it actually is.

Game over Mach. Seek mental health help for you TDS.

(10-25-2017 05:41 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Now I know this is foreign to many of you who seem so enthralled in making baseless claims. Take for example this thread. They make a claim that Trump has been vindicated. That is laughable at best a lie at its worst. Trump claimed the FBI, Clinton, and Russia paid for the dossier. This is simply not true.

You can't be serious right now. You're denying this as it's all over the news, including your beloved CNN?

The gig's up Mach. You picked the wrong battle. It would be better if you just found another topic to discuss. We could respect that. Your constant attempts to still be right on this just continually open you up to attacks. Ya gotta let it go big dawg.

(10-25-2017 05:39 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Here is what you call support:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/...57286.html

So I read that, it confirms that the guy is considered a spy, but it didn't say what that has to do with Trump. Can you fill in the blanks here?

(10-25-2017 05:38 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  You were saying.

Now this is how it works. I made a claim. Parts of the dossier have been verified.

Here is my evidence of that claim.

https://globalsecurityreview.com/u-s-off...om-allies/

Now I will continue to look for links that support that evidence.

Again, this link (article) is chock full of accusations. Not one part of it shows evidence, proof, or anything of the like. It's the author's accusations based on the dossier... you know, the one the gov't hasn't found a shred of evidence to support.

(10-25-2017 05:49 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(10-25-2017 05:39 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Here is what you call support:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/...57286.html

So I read that, it confirms that the guy is considered a spy, but it didn't say what that has to do with Trump. Can you fill in the blanks here?

"considered"

More accusations. Zero evidence.

Poor Mach.

Uh oh, it looks like Hilldawg could face charges related to campaign finance laws.

(10-25-2017 06:11 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  Uh oh, it looks like Hilldawg could face charges related to campaign finance laws.

You finally going to lock someone up?

(10-25-2017 05:38 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  You were saying.

Now this is how it works. I made a claim. Parts of the dossier have been verified.

Here is my evidence of that claim.

https://globalsecurityreview.com/u-s-off...om-allies/

Now I will continue to look for links that support that evidence.

Mach that thing reads like a rejected script for a 70's James Bond knock off.

There is 0 evidence presented of anything in that article.

Sent from my SM-G900R4 using CSNbbs mobile app

This is approaching warning level Red!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The winner here is Putin. He has successfully created more political division in this country than we have had since the 1960's.

Donald Trump has faced more opposition than any political figure since the civil rights era. If they had anything on the guy it would have been out by now

The. Entire. Political. Establishment. Worked. Against. Him.

The dossier was crap a year ago which is why Clinton didn't use it and its crap now

It will be fun watching you guys eat crow when Mueller starts handing out indictments.

I'm ready for podestas

(10-25-2017 08:31 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  It will be fun watching you guys eat crow when Mueller starts handing out indictments.

Against himself?