stinkfist
nuts zongo's in the house
Posts: 68,897
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 7030
I Root For: Mustard Buzzards
Location: who knows?
|
RE: Mueller Now Investigating The Podesta Group
(10-23-2017 04:48 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: (10-23-2017 03:04 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: This is akin to you guys celebrating a dismal trump approval rating. If they're dirty, then Manafort is likely dirty, ergo trump is likely dirty.
But keep hope alive!
What it really is an example of the special investigator being a bad law. Finding no wrong doing is essentially seen as "failure" by these guys. So, essentially they become very powerful; guided missiles rooting around everywhere until they find something to prosecute. Its essentially like having a traffic cop follow you all day every day. Eventually you're going to get a ticket.
perfect analogy.....well done!
you were much nicer than what I did NOT post.....
|
|
10-24-2017 04:58 PM |
|
stinkfist
nuts zongo's in the house
Posts: 68,897
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 7030
I Root For: Mustard Buzzards
Location: who knows?
|
RE: Mueller Now Investigating The Podesta Group
(10-24-2017 09:29 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: (10-23-2017 05:15 PM)bullet Wrote: (10-23-2017 04:48 PM)Attackcoog Wrote: (10-23-2017 03:04 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: This is akin to you guys celebrating a dismal trump approval rating. If they're dirty, then Manafort is likely dirty, ergo trump is likely dirty.
But keep hope alive!
What it really is an example of the special investigator being a bad law. Finding no wrong doing is essentially seen as "failure" by these guys. So, essentially they become very powerful; guided missiles rooting around everywhere until they find something to prosecute. Its essentially like having a traffic cop follow you all day every day. Eventually you're going to get a ticket.
They appear to be digging into stuff from several years back in Ukraine that has nothing directly to do with what he was hired for. It was already being investigated by the FBI.
Aren't these investigations required to follow wherever things lead? If they see criminality aren't they obligated to follow it and investigate it to see if it applies to the initial reason for their investigation?
Seems like it would be more burdensome as a whole to just leave the stone unturned and/or forward things onto another agency to investigate.
not only are you naive that is full of bs, but you 'full circled' back to attackcoog's point....
you win the #arsehandtoyouaward
|
|
10-24-2017 05:04 PM |
|