http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/...evelations

Quote:A former press secretary for Bill Clinton lashed out on Twitter Thursday, after a report this week revealed the existence of an FBI criminal investigation into a Russian nuclear energy company that the Obama administration allowed the sale of uranium assets to in 2010.

The FBI uranium investigation was going on in 2009 2010 under Mueller.

Comey left Lockheed Martin in 2010 with a "free" 6 million dollars plus departure check. That same year LM became a member of the Clinton Global Foundation and won 17 mega contracts from with State Dept.

A couple of years later Comey replaces Mueller.

the damage has been done.....

there is little question the evidence suggests a need for congressional intervention.....

what's sad is it was allowed to happen and some serious back-stabbing is getting ready to occur.....

I have no clue why I abhor politics.....

/sarc

(10-20-2017 08:21 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  the damage has been done.....

there is little question the evidence suggests a need for congressional intervention.....

what's sad is it was allowed to happen and some serious back-stabbing is getting ready to occur.....

I have no clue why I abhor politics.....

/sarc

As this unfolds you will see republican involved. The Bush's, McCain, maybe? Trump is in a position to clean the mess up. Will he? Time will tell.

(10-20-2017 08:57 AM)ODU BLUE Wrote:  

(10-20-2017 08:21 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  the damage has been done.....

there is little question the evidence suggests a need for congressional intervention.....

what's sad is it was allowed to happen and some serious back-stabbing is getting ready to occur.....

I have no clue why I abhor politics.....

/sarc

As this unfolds you will see republican involved. The Bush's, McCain, maybe? Trump is in a position to clean the mess up. Will he? Time will tell.

if there's substantial evidence, this should simply be investigated....

think about it, Mueller is almost a year into investigating DJT (who won) based on ZERO evidence.....

and this one isn't collusion.....this is downright treason....

what the fuckkkkkkkkkkkkk has the leadershite in this cuntry become........

(10-20-2017 08:57 AM)ODU BLUE Wrote:  

(10-20-2017 08:21 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  the damage has been done.....

there is little question the evidence suggests a need for congressional intervention.....

what's sad is it was allowed to happen and some serious back-stabbing is getting ready to occur.....

I have no clue why I abhor politics.....

/sarc

As this unfolds you will see republican involved. The Bush's, McCain, maybe? Trump is in a position to clean the mess up. Will he? Time will tell.

I can definitely see McCain in the mix

A red flag pops up for me when a republican or any elected official start the global first rhetoric. They've usually found a way to make money personally by transferring OUR wealth, natural resources, technology or jobs to distant lands.

(10-20-2017 09:03 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(10-20-2017 08:57 AM)ODU BLUE Wrote:  

(10-20-2017 08:21 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  the damage has been done.....

there is little question the evidence suggests a need for congressional intervention.....

what's sad is it was allowed to happen and some serious back-stabbing is getting ready to occur.....

I have no clue why I abhor politics.....

/sarc

As this unfolds you will see republican involved. The Bush's, McCain, maybe? Trump is in a position to clean the mess up. Will he? Time will tell.

I can definitely see McCain in the mix

It's a known fact he met with Russins.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-secur...an-nuclear

http://www.investors.com/politics/editor...bout-time/

Donations to the Clinton Foundation, and a Russian Uranium Takeover

Uranium investors’ efforts to buy mining assets in Kazakhstan and the United States led to a takeover bid by a Russian state-owned energy company. The investors gave millions to the Clinton Foundation over the same period, while Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s office was involved with approving the Russian bid.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015...stors.html

This is not Uranium One but a Canadian based company masquerading as a USA, Virginia company.

Virginia Uranium is owned by Virginia Energy Resources Inc., based in Vancouver, British Columbia Canada. The parent company is a plaintiff in both suits, along with Coles Hill and Bowen Minerals.

In the suit pending in Danville Virginia, the company estimated the value of the uranium deposit at $6 billion

The companies failed to persuade the General Assembly to end the moratorium, which McAuliffe promised to uphold in his successful gubernatorial campaign in 2013. The governor’s office said Wednesday it would not comment on pending litigation.

Better watch ole Terry McAuliffe before he leaves office. A reversal could be lucrative.

http://www.richmond.com/news/virginia/go...9c59d.html

Does that constitute lashing out? Seems kind of benign for a retaliatory remark.

(10-20-2017 11:05 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  Does that constitute lashing out? Seems kind of benign for a retaliatory remark.

Its as much lashing out as the libturds can muster at this point. Trump kicks them in the junk so hard every time they try that most of them are now gender confused.

(10-20-2017 11:16 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-20-2017 11:05 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  Does that constitute lashing out? Seems kind of benign for a retaliatory remark.

Its as much lashing out as the libturds can muster at this point. Trump kicks them in the junk so hard every time they try that most of them are now gender confused.

Your posts all read like a 13 year old youtuber commenter.

(10-20-2017 11:16 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-20-2017 11:05 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  Does that constitute lashing out? Seems kind of benign for a retaliatory remark.

Its as much lashing out as the libturds can muster at this point. Trump kicks them in the junk so hard every time they try that most of them are now gender confused.

Lol....I disagree....they always understood how to make the chow line longer....

(10-20-2017 11:03 AM)ODU BLUE Wrote:  This is not Uranium One but a Canadian based company masquerading as a USA, Virginia company.

Better watch ole Terry McAuliffe before he leaves office. A reversal could be lucrative.

http://www.richmond.com/news/virginia/go...9c59d.html

Supreme Court seeks White House view on Virginia uranium-mining ban

https://www.reuters.com/article/scotus-u...SL2N1MD269

https://www.law360.com/articles/970115/j...g-ban-case

Virginia’s Coles Hill Uranium Deposit Faces Crucial Vote as Russia Takes Uranium One
January 17, 2013

Quote:United States’ bid for energy independence at risk

Energy independence in the United States relies heavily on the nation’s ability to develop its own natural resources for domestic use. In a country that consumes 55 million pounds of uranium fuel a year, but only produces 4 million pounds, the development of significant uranium deposits like Coles Hill is all the more important.

That is especially true in light of Monday’s news that Uranium One (TSX:UUU) will now be wholly owned by Russian state-controlled miner ARMZ. Uranium One holds the Willow Creek uranium mine, which is located in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming; it produced 214,800 pounds of U3O8 in 2011 and has significant potential for expansion. On Monday, Uranium One announced that ARMZ will pay C$1.3 billion for the remaining 48.6 percent of the company not already under its control. The Russian company plans to delist Uranium One. Uranium Investing News will continue to follow both these stories as they unfold.

https://investingnews.com/daily/resource...rce=Resour

(10-20-2017 11:18 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(10-20-2017 11:16 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-20-2017 11:05 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  Does that constitute lashing out? Seems kind of benign for a retaliatory remark.

Its as much lashing out as the libturds can muster at this point. Trump kicks them in the junk so hard every time they try that most of them are now gender confused.

Your posts all read like a 13 year old youtuber commenter.

How would you know that?

Spend a lot of time following 13YO utubers? !?

Ewwwwww....

(10-20-2017 01:32 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(10-20-2017 11:18 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(10-20-2017 11:16 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-20-2017 11:05 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  Does that constitute lashing out? Seems kind of benign for a retaliatory remark.

Its as much lashing out as the libturds can muster at this point. Trump kicks them in the junk so hard every time they try that most of them are now gender confused.

Your posts all read like a 13 year old youtuber commenter.

How would you know that?

Spend a lot of time following 13YO utubers? !?

Ewwwwww....