(10-12-2017 03:58 PM)Cerebus Wrote:  

(10-12-2017 03:41 PM)Rowdys Castle Wrote:  So, from what I can tell, based these numbers, we both suck.

It's almost like we live in a state in which a few state schools poured as much money as possible into athletics post WWII, and then once they had built a huge head start, changed the rules on how state money could be used for athletics.

WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT???!!! Lies!

(10-12-2017 02:52 PM)UNT15 Wrote:  

(10-12-2017 02:23 PM)correcamino Wrote:  

(10-12-2017 02:09 PM)UNT15 Wrote:  

(10-12-2017 08:43 AM)correcamino Wrote:  .300 winning percentage

Funny you should be obsessed with this since UTSA has a .333 winning percentage against FBS competition since becoming an FBS member

and North Texas win percentage since coming back up is actually .349.

so your best period of football ever is still worse than our worst.

They don't teach math at the music school or what?

We've played 41 games since becoming a full FBS member. We've won 16 of those (39%). If you include our two transitional years, and why wouldn't you unless you are a salty Texas Northern fan , that jumps up to ~48%.

A for effort though since I know math isn't your music school's strong suit.

my math game was pretty solid. it's your reading comprehension that leaves something to be desired, but since I'm in a generous mood I'll take your hand and walk you through the math, pumpkin.

UTSA has played 41 games since becoming a full FBS member, but 3 wins were against non-FBS members (Charlotte 2014, Alabama St 2015, Southern 2016). I'm being generous and letting you keep some others (Texas State?). 13/38 = .342. I admit I did make an error earlier, but it was an error of commission. I had y'all at 13/39 <--failed to remove UH (42-3 instead of 41-3); thankfully Harvey kept y'all from having to add that L to the column. my mistake

I understand though why you want to keep games against Northwestern OK State, Texas A&M-Commerce, Georgia State, Minot State, Bacone, McNeese St and Northeastern Oklahoma on the record.

Hold up, why are you counting all of Texas Northern's games to calculate your percentage but only counting FBS games for ours? Does Texas Northern not play FCS teams or something? Portland St begs to differ, tbh.

because it take more time than I care to invest to count 105 years (or 22 in the time period you keep referencing) than it does to count the illustrious 4 years of UTSA football. hth

I don't know what they teach at Band University but in the real world that's not how comparisons work, buddy.

My conservative guess is you'd lose atleast 10 FCS wins and only 1 loss thus making your winning pct that much more embarrassing. You don't have an apples to apples comparison, come back when you have one. Darrell and I already provided three for you.

(10-12-2017 03:41 PM)Rowdys Castle Wrote:  So, from what I can tell, based these numbers, we both suck.

The silver lining is its only a 3.25 year sample for us. If we put up those type of percentages for over 2 decades, then yes sadly we'd be a trash program right alongside Texas Northern Band College.

Luckily, its really really hard to suck that bad for that long. The odds are in our favor that we won't end up being like them.

Guys, as entertaining as this is... it doesn't hold a candle to Correcamino taking on the entire Punch U fan base...

(10-12-2017 08:24 PM)correcamino Wrote:  

(10-12-2017 03:41 PM)Rowdys Castle Wrote:  So, from what I can tell, based these numbers, we both suck.

The silver lining is its only a 3.25 year sample for us. If we put up those type of percentages for over 2 decades, then yes sadly we'd be a trash program right alongside Texas Northern Band College.

Luckily, its really really hard to suck that bad for that long. The odds are in our favor that we won't end up being like them.

UT-sa is new to football, so yes, you kind of get a pass on not winning, but UT-sa has played other sports for quite a while. Where is the success?

North Texas has...
22 DI/FBS conference titles in football
15 conference titles in men's basketball
4 NCAA National Titles in men's golf

Again, go win something youngin'.

(10-13-2017 06:04 PM)Side Show Joe Wrote:  

(10-12-2017 08:24 PM)correcamino Wrote:  

(10-12-2017 03:41 PM)Rowdys Castle Wrote:  So, from what I can tell, based these numbers, we both suck.

The silver lining is its only a 3.25 year sample for us. If we put up those type of percentages for over 2 decades, then yes sadly we'd be a trash program right alongside Texas Northern Band College.

Luckily, its really really hard to suck that bad for that long. The odds are in our favor that we won't end up being like them.

UT-sa is new to football, so yes, you kind of get a pass on not winning, but UT-sa has played other sports for quite a while. Where is the success?

North Texas has...
22 DI/FBS conference titles in football
15 conference titles in men's basketball
4 NCAA National Titles in men's golf

Again, go win something youngin'.

UTSA baseball has 3 conference championships. How's your team doing these days?

Only 7 the past 60 years. So one every 8.5 years. Take out the Slumbelt run and it's 3 in 56 years. How pathetic is that? Keep thinking the 1930s and 1940s make you relevant though.

North Texas has played basketball since 1916 and only been to the NCAA tournament 3 times.

UTSA has been playing basketball since 1981 and has been to the NCAA tournament 4 times, with 1 win.

And you're telling us to go win something?

(10-13-2017 06:31 PM)DarrellEW Wrote:  North Texas has played basketball since 1916 and only been to the NCAA tournament 3 times.

UTSA has been playing basketball since 1981 and has been to the NCAA tournament 4 times, with 1 win.

And you're telling us to go win something?

How about Men's Track & Field?

UNT (1932-present): 17 conference titles
UTSA (1992-present): 14 conference titles

60 years. SIXTY YEARS. and only 3 more titles.

Now I get why y'all are so scared of us.

(10-13-2017 06:38 PM)correcamino Wrote:  

(10-13-2017 06:31 PM)DarrellEW Wrote:  North Texas has played basketball since 1916 and only been to the NCAA tournament 3 times.

UTSA has been playing basketball since 1981 and has been to the NCAA tournament 4 times, with 1 win.

And you're telling us to go win something?

Yes, a win over Alabama St. must be quite impressive to your fans.

North Texas athletics has produced 65 conference titles and 4 national championships. You may not like it, but those are the facts.

This is like an old, lifelong McDonald's employee bragging about having more in his savings account than a recent grad just starting his career.

Yeah, you have more by virtue of being so much older not because you are superior.

Here is a prediction by Javier Cardenas of BirdsUp.com, a team website that is part of the Rivals.com network.

http://www.dentonrc.com/sports/mean-gree...birdsupcom

Speaking of which, y'all have a Rivals or 247 yet? You brag about your amount of alumni but even your alumni aren't interested enough in your trash program to support such a site.

(10-13-2017 08:00 PM)correcamino Wrote:  Speaking of which, y'all have a Rivals or 247 yet? You brag about your amount of alumni but even your alumni aren't interested enough in your trash program to support such a site.

"Ultimately I think the UNT offense proves to be a little too much for the UTSA defense."

http://www.dentonrc.com/sports/mean-gree...birdsupcom

How'd you like that prediction by your UTSA guy?

(10-13-2017 07:02 PM)Side Show Joe Wrote:  

(10-13-2017 06:38 PM)correcamino Wrote:  

(10-13-2017 06:31 PM)DarrellEW Wrote:  North Texas has played basketball since 1916 and only been to the NCAA tournament 3 times.

UTSA has been playing basketball since 1981 and has been to the NCAA tournament 4 times, with 1 win.

And you're telling us to go win something?

Yes, a win over Alabama St. must be quite impressive to your fans.

North Texas athletics has produced 65 conference titles and 4 national championships. You may not like it, but those are the facts.

Yeah, a win over Alabama State isn't very impressive, but it's a hell of a lot better than not even getting there.

UTSA had a total of 58 conference championships just from our 21 years in the Southland Conference. And you've got 65 titles in over a hundred years. Congrats.

I've come to realize that North Texas State isn't scared of being passed up by UTSA. They're mad that they've already been passed up.

(10-13-2017 08:14 PM)Side Show Joe Wrote:  

(10-13-2017 08:00 PM)correcamino Wrote:  Speaking of which, y'all have a Rivals or 247 yet? You brag about your amount of alumni but even your alumni aren't interested enough in your trash program to support such a site.

"Ultimately I think the UNT offense proves to be a little too much for the UTSA defense."

http://www.dentonrc.com/sports/mean-gree...birdsupcom

How'd you like that prediction by your UTSA guy?

Why does that even matter? Predictions don't determine games.Thats a pretty embarrassing attempt at smack talk on your end.