Looks like the mighty AAC has not improved a lot of programs in that league (are ya listening ECU?)

Temple, SMU, and Tulane are probably the three biggest "winners" in terms of getting something from the AAC. All three were previously atrocious, and then turned it around with good institutional changes + AAC funds.

(10-07-2017 04:19 PM)eaglebeaver Wrote:  Looks like the mighty AAC has not improved a lot of programs in that league (are ya listening ECU?)

Depends on how you look at it. TULANE just put up 62 points and Memphis put up 70. Both of those schools are notorious losers. So looks like those programs have improved.

(10-07-2017 04:35 PM)Reggie Favre Wrote:  

(10-07-2017 04:19 PM)eaglebeaver Wrote:  Looks like the mighty AAC has not improved a lot of programs in that league (are ya listening ECU?)

Depends on how you look at it. TULANE just put up 62 points and Memphis put up 70. Both of those schools are notorious losers. So looks like those programs have improved.

Improved or byproduct of competition level?? I'm leaning toward the latter

You think we got attendance problems? Here's how good the pirates look

https://twitter.com/EmptySeatsPics/statu...9306232837https://twitter.com/EmptySeatsPics/statu...9306232837

(10-08-2017 12:38 AM)EagleFWB Wrote:  You think we got attendance problems? Here's how good the pirates look

https://twitter.com/EmptySeatsPics/statu...9306232837https://twitter.com/EmptySeatsPics/statu...9306232837

Their attendance was bad, but that was the final seconds of the game in a blowout loss. Seen pics of the rock with 10 seconds left in the north texas game? Im sure we dont want to.