http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/w...li=BBnb7Kz

A petty media to go with a petty president.

FFS, do you understand that it's not the use of a private email account that is a security problem? It's the use of a private non-secure SERVER to store classified information that creates a security problem. The two are not the same.

oh no... I have used a private email too!

(09-25-2017 05:10 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  FFS, do you understand that it's not the use of a private email account that is a security problem? It's the use of a private non-secure SERVER to store classified information that creates a security problem. The two are not the same.

Private email should not be used for official business of any kind.

That applies to Hillary, Ivanka, and Colin Powell IMO. It needs to be stopped.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

(09-25-2017 05:10 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  FFS, do you understand that it's not the use of a private email account that is a security problem? It's the use of a private non-secure SERVER to store classified information that creates a security problem. The two are not the same.

I called them petty. Which means I see what they are doing.

(09-25-2017 05:12 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  

(09-25-2017 05:10 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  FFS, do you understand that it's not the use of a private email account that is a security problem? It's the use of a private non-secure SERVER to store classified information that creates a security problem. The two are not the same.

Private email should not be used for official business of any kind.
That applies to Hillary, Ivanka, and Colin Powell IMO. It needs to be stopped.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

Agree, but it does not create a security risk unless classified material is placed on a non-secure server or communications circuit. The two are not the same. It's a violation, but a different and very much lesser one.

(09-25-2017 05:10 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  FFS, do you understand that it's not the use of a private email account that is a security problem? It's the use of a private non-secure SERVER to store classified information that creates a security problem. The two are not the same.

The loony Left will do ANYTHING to try and defend HRC. What they should do? See that the Clinton legacy ends up in prison and then reinvent the party outside of the establishment. Of course that will never happen. The Clintons are as close to royalty as it gets in America outside of the Kennedy's.

(09-25-2017 05:11 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  oh no... I have used a private email too!

Please turn over your email address hotvet69@aol.com to the proper authorities for official review.

(09-25-2017 05:26 PM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(09-25-2017 05:11 PM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  oh no... I have used a private email too!

Please turn over your email address hotvet69@aol.com to the proper authorities for official review.

you caught me!

(09-25-2017 05:21 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  

(09-25-2017 05:10 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  FFS, do you understand that it's not the use of a private email account that is a security problem? It's the use of a private non-secure SERVER to store classified information that creates a security problem. The two are not the same.

The loony Left will do ANYTHING to try and defend HRC. What they should do? See that the Clinton legacy ends up in prison and then reinvent the party outside of the establishment. Of course that will never happen. The Clintons are as close to royalty as it gets in America outside of the Kennedy's.

Are you STILL ignoring what I and many others on the left have said, that what H did was wrong? Why?

(09-25-2017 05:18 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(09-25-2017 05:12 PM)ark30inf Wrote:  

(09-25-2017 05:10 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  FFS, do you understand that it's not the use of a private email account that is a security problem? It's the use of a private non-secure SERVER to store classified information that creates a security problem. The two are not the same.

Private email should not be used for official business of any kind.
That applies to Hillary, Ivanka, and Colin Powell IMO. It needs to be stopped.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

Agree, but it does not create a security risk unless classified material is placed on a non-secure server or communications circuit. The two are not the same. It's a violation, but a different and very much lesser one.

How do you know that Ivanka or Jared...or the several others reported to have used personal e-mail...did not send classified or sensitive data over personal e-mail accounts? Or are you assuring that even if they did that the data was totally secure?

(09-25-2017 05:10 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  FFS, do you understand that it's not the use of a private email account that is a security problem? It's the use of a private non-secure SERVER to store classified information that creates a security problem. The two are not the same.

No. He doesn't understand.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app